Author Topic: The last ultimate test of gun, to prove sound moderator was not used in shooting  (Read 49744 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The Prosecution were not told that Cook had dismantled the silencer and rebuilt it before the crucial flake of blood was found inside the silencer on 11th September 1985. If they had done, the prosecution would have been duty bound to inform the defense of these matters, which in turn would have been subject of a legal challenge during the trial to have the silencer, blood evidence excluded because of the strong risk that it could have got into the silencer by a process of contamination, and not by backspatter...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Not widely reported, is the fact that the ballistic expert retained 14 bullet cases under an exhibit reference of MDF/100...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Not widely reported, is the fact that the ballistic expert retained 14 bullet cases under an exhibit reference of MDF/100...

These 14 bullet cases are still being retained in storage at Huntingdon Lab' (according to Mr Renshaw, ballistics expert)......
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Ballistics Expert, Fletcher, only produced two exhibited items as part of his contribution to the police investigation, namely, MDF/100 (the 14 spent bullet cases, and MDF/1, (the cloth pull through of the. Anshuzt rifles barrel...
« Last Edit: June 09, 2014, 09:04:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Only one of the two exhibited items introduced into the investigation by Fletcher, has got a lab' item number...
« Last Edit: June 09, 2014, 09:08:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Only one of the two exhibited items introduced into the investigation by Fletcher, has got a lab' item number...

Only the cloth pull-through (MDF/1) of the barrel of the anshuzt rifle had a lab' item number, issued though out of date / sequence.....
« Last Edit: June 09, 2014, 09:05:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
These 14 bullet cases are still being retained in storage at Huntingdon Lab' (according to Mr Renshaw, ballistics expert)......

and?

These 14 had remnants of latent fingerprints but they were not of sufficient quality to match them to anyone.  They were only partial fingerprints and not able to be matched.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Since Fletcher did not receive the batch of crime scene ammunition until 20th September 1985, any bullet cases which eventually became re - labelled MDF/100, from MDF/1,  had to follow on in sequence after other exhibits at the lab' had already been given corresponding lab' numbers in sequential order, as per order exhibits received at the lab' or produced at the lab...

Well, I can report that the official test fire of control bullets via the anshuzt rifle and silencer, took place between 20th September and 2nd October 1985, which becomes significant when you realize that the lab' number allocated to the cloth pull - through of the guns barrel, which was supposedly undertaken on 12th September 1985, could not have been issued until on or after the 2nd October 1985. This indicates that the evidence of the cloth pull -through is significantly tainted, since it could not have been taken on the 12th September 1985, otherwise it remained at the lab' for a large number of days and nights, until on or after the 2nd October 1985, without being allocated a proper lab' item number which fitted in sequential order aside every other exhibit received or produced at the lab'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
We now know of course, that there was an earlier unofficial test fire of the gun and silencer with at least two of the 29 control bullets, and that these were used to make comparison tests with some of the crime scene bullets and bullet cases, on the following dates, which preceded the date of the official test fire of the same...

12th, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985...

So, what appears to have happened in the minds of police and the ballistic expert, is that they introduced the cloth pull - through evidence under an exhibit reference which had previously been attributed to the 14 bullet cases still in storage at the lab' with part fingerprints upon them. These fingerprints are understood to have originated from June Bamber, not Jeremy or Sheila. This is why this fingerprint evidence from these 14 bullet cases (originally  exhibit, MDF/1) was not disclosed or mentioned by police to the prosecution, or in turn by the prosecution to the defence...

Had this evidence not been deliberately withheld by unscrupulous police officers, it would almost certainly have led to Bambers acquittal...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Exhibit reference of the 14 bullet cases (MDF/1) was altered and made into MDF/100, by the addition of two additional noughts, so that the cloth pull through of the guns barrel could be slipped in, bolstering up the claim that the silencer was used on the gun at the time Sheila was shot and killed by the bullet under the chin...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The cloth pull - through test results are dodgy just like the silencer, blood and paint evidence associated with the silencer...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The cloth pull - through test results are dodgy just like the silencer, blood and paint evidence associated with the silencer...

Dodgy find of the silencer by relatives not the police, dodgy exhibit labelling of the silencer, dodgy loose flake floating around here there and everywhere inside the silencer, dodgy grey coloured hair that went missing, dodgy evidence surrounding all features and aspects of the silencer evidence, by involvement of dodgy police officers and prosecution witnesses, no matter which part of the investigation you choose to look into or examine, its all dodgy and in turmoil...

Then of course, we come to another cross road in the evidence trail involving the part fingerprints on the substituted 14 bullet cases (MDF/1). Forget whose fingerprints they belonged to, what matters is that whoever handled these / those bullet cases, did so without wearing gloves of any kind, and that only part fingerprints were found to be present on all of these cases. Incomplete, you may well wonder, because the other parts of the fingers which picked up the 14 additional rounds touched or handled or manipulated the 14 lead bullet heads which formed part and parcel of these crucial 14 rounds recovered from the bodies of the victims, or the crime scene...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
So, with this in mind, had the fingerprint evidence found upon these 14 bullet cases (MDF/1) - subsequently altered into MDF/100, by the addition of two additional noughts, the fact that the results of hand swab test carried out on the fingers and hands of Sheila Caffell supported the argument for her not having handled any bullet cases which needed to be picked up and loaded into the gun so that everybody, including herself could be killed off, when all along police had this part fingerprint evidence on these 14 bullet cases, incomplete because whoever picked up those 14 rounds touched the leaded bullet head and the brass bullet cases during the reloading of the gun phase, and that person was not Sheila...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
June Bambers fingers and her hands were not swabbed, so it remains a very distinct possibility that the part fingerprints found upon these 14 bullet cases, had been picked up and handled and loaded into the gun by June Bamber, not Jeremy, otherwise you could bet your bottom dollar that the police would have told the prosecution about the existence of these 14 bullet cases with part fingerprints upon them, set in superglue, during tests which Ronny Cook performed on the 23rd August 1985, at the police research and development branch, etc, etc, etc...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Part fingerprints, on 14 bullet cases recovered from various locations around the farmhouse, which police believed were the additional 14 rounds required to be loaded into the gun, so that the 25 shots could all be accounted for...

These are still held at Huntingdon Lab' according to the ballistic expert, Mr Renshaw (2004), and were not destroyed in 1996, as alleged by Essex police...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...