The last ultimate test of gun, to prove sound moderator was not used in shooting

[mike tesko]

The prosecutions ballistic expert (Fletcher) has been well and truly discredited, he is nothing but a lying bastard, and a conspirator involved in perverting the course of justice...

You cannot believe anything he says about the case, he is a criminal who has not yet been punished by the criminal justice system...

The system that is in place to try and if convicted punish offenders like this, is itself corrupt...

[mike tesko]

The prosecutions ballistic expert (Fletcher) has been well and truly discredited, he is nothing but a lying bastard, and a conspirator involved in perverting the course of justice...

You cannot believe anything he says about the case, he is a criminal who has not yet been punished by the criminal justice system...

The system that is in place to try and if convicted punish offenders like this, is itself corrupt...

Bias is also prevalent...

[mike tesko]

Bring back hanging for lying prosecution witnesses....

[mike tesko]

I would gladly apply for the role of executioner, let me be the UK's official hang man, I will not even want paying for carrying out my duties, I hate fucking lying witnesses and corrupted police officers, and other lying bastards in the chain of command in the criminal justice system...

I have been a victim of this kind of corruption, and no-one can convince me that it doesn't go on, because it fucking well does....

[mike tesko]

I would gladly apply for the role of executioner, let me be the UK's official hang man, I will not even want paying for carrying out my duties, I hate fucking lying witnesses and corrupted police officers, and other lying bastards in the chain of command in the criminal justice system...

I have been a victim of this kind of corruption, and no-one can convince me that it doesn't go on, because it fucking well does....

Jeremy Bamber killed no'one...

[mike tesko]

If I can prove that the ballistics expert (Fletcher) has lied, then his evidence and  testimony, has to be rejected, and treated, as discredited...

[mike tesko]

If I can prove that the ballistics expert (Fletcher) has lied, then his evidence and  testimony, has to be rejected, and treated, as discredited...

His contribution to the discovery of the so called flake inside the silencer can no longer be relied upon as being true, and accurate...

[mike tesko]

To recap thus far...

Silencer exhibit referencing is dodgy to say the least - silencer starts off as SBJ/1, then becomes DB/1, and eventually changes into DRB/1...

It first of all has a lab' item number of 22, then becomes 23, and is later changed back to 22...

[mike tesko]

The sudden appearance of a loose flake of blood producing blood group activity similar to that of Sheila Caffell inside the first few baffles of the silencer on 11th September 1985, casts doubt on the suggestion that this so called unique flake of blood got into the silencer at the time Sheila was shot and killed. The very nature of the flake and its uniqueness was not reproduced anywhere else inside the same silencer...

The size of the flake was so small that it could easily fall through the holes or bore at either end of the silencer at the top and bottom end, as well as any of the holes of the individual 17 internal baffle plates, and solitary top washer...

With this in mind, surely concern should be given to the almost certain movement of the flake inside the silencer unit from whenever it got into the silencer, since by the time the flake was apparently discovered on the 11th September 1985, over a month had elapsed since the time of the shootings, and it had been handled at the scene by various relatives of the family who did not take any measures to protect its integrity either at the scene or elsewhere when it was supposedly put into storage at a relatives home. Imagine how many times it was turned upside down, this way and that way, and transported away from the scene in the boot of a relatives car with other bloodstained exhibits that relatives also took away from the scene at the same time?

That small piece of unique blood did obviously not remain static in one place if it was already inside the silencer, it had the potential to move around, to fall out of the silencer, or as it were, also fall into it...

[mike tesko]

By evening of 12th August 1985, another relative (Peter Eaton) is handling the silencer, he must have picked it up from wherever it had been put days previously, carried it before handing it to Ds Jones, who eventually took it away in his car back to the police station. Not to be forgotten, is that DS Jones had been to the scene on the morning of the shootings, and examined Sheila's body at close quarters, without having taken any precautionary measures to prevent any of Sheila's blood becoming transferred onto parts of his body and clothing. So, on evening of 12th August when DS Jones collects the silencer from the relatives, there is a serious risk that blood from Sheila at the scene became transferred onto or into the silencer. In any event, if the small loose flake of blood could not possibly have remained static inside the silencer whilst being handed over to Jones by Eaton, and transported away to the police station, silencer would have been turned around, bounced up and down, providing the ideal environment for a small flake of blood to move considerably around or into the silencer...

[mike tesko]

When Jones arrives at the police station he places the silencer inside a locked drawer...

The drawer has to be slid shut, producing movement of the silencer. We do not know whether or not any other bloodstained exhibit from the scene had been placed inside that drawer previously, or present on that occasion. On the following morning, Jones goes to retrieve the silencer from the aforementioned drawer, sliding the drawer open, again causing movement of the silncer, he picks the silencer up and takes it away to show PI 'Bob'Miller. Again movement of the silencer, which potentially contains a small loose flake of blood small enough to pass through into or out of the many larger holes of the silencer...

[mike tesko]

PI Miller, is another officer who attended the scene and viewed the bloodstained body of Sheila Caffell, making him another prime candidate as the source where the small loose flake of blood had got into the silencer whilst handling it...

[mike tesko]

Miller tells Jones to give the silencer to DI Cook because he was going slong to the lab' later that day with other exhibits of the cade. Cook was head SOCO at the scene, not only had he viewed Sheila's bloodstained body at close quarters, but he had physically disturbed Sheila's bloodstained right hand, and arm to permit PC Bird to photograph bloodied marks on the front lower part of the victims nightdress, Cook had also removed the bloodstained rifle from her body and had stood it by the bedroom window. He had not worn gloves whilst carrying out these duties, so obviously there was obviously a very good chance that blood from Sheila got transferred onto his body ir clothing...

[mike tesko]

Cook receives possession of the silencer from Jones, and transports it to the lab'...

Throughout this journey, the silencer is bounced around, this way that way, until upon arrival at the lab' Cook hands the silencer over to Glynis Howard...

Thus far, there has been considerable movement of the silencer, through handling and transpirtation, with many opportunities for a small flake of dried blood to get into the silencer from witnesses who themselves could have inadvertently contaminated the silencer with that small loose flake of blood picked up by anyone of them at the scene...

[mike tesko]

By the time Glynis Howard received the silencer at the lab' on 13th August 1985, she was the only person who had not been in direct contact with the silencer and the bloodstained scene - everyone else who had handled the silencer in the meantime had had such access and opportunity to contaminate the silencer with that small flake of dried blood...