The last ultimate test of gun, to prove sound moderator was not used in shooting

[mike tesko]

WHAT HAPPENED IS / was, that whilst the rifle was being test fired with use of the silencer and control ammunition, a loose piece of Sheila's blood inside the end of the guns barrel was blasted into the silencer, hence why the loose flake suddenly appeared inside the silencer, when Fletcher examined it on 11th September 1985, despite no such loose flake being present on 29th August, when Cook (Soco) dismantled it...

This is why police and thier ballistic expert, tried to withhold details of the unofficial test fire of the rifle, before 12th September 1985...

The official test fire of the rifle, using 27 of the 29 control bullets, was not undertaken until between 20th September and the 2nd October 1985...

[mike tesko]

There is a very high risk that the crucial flake of blood did not get sucked into the silencer at the time Sheila was shot by the bullet under the chin that killed her, but rather the small flek of Sheila's blood was blasted into the silencer during an unreported test fire of the gun and silencer with control ammunition prior to the 12th September 1985...

If true, the jury would almost certainly have accepted that Sheila had killed herself...

[mike tesko]

There is a very high risk that the crucial flake of blood did not get sucked into the silencer at the time Sheila was shot by the bullet under the chin that killed her, but rather the small flek of Sheila's blood was blasted into the silencer during an unreported test fire of the gun and silencer with control ammunition prior to the 12th September 1985...

If true, the jury would almost certainly have accepted that Sheila had killed herself...

Even though in truth, she did not...

[mike tesko]

Before I finally get around to detailing the ultimate test of the gun which can prove that the silencer was not fitted to the rifles barrel at the time Sheila was shot and killed, I want to spell it out that there was an unofficial test firing of rifle, silencer and control. bullets, long before the official test fire of the same, which took place between the 20th September and 2nd October 1985. If I can prove that an earlier test fire of the gun and silencer had indeed taken place beforehand, it surely throws into doubt the overall integrity of the firearms and ballistics evidence relied upon by the prosecutions case to make sure that they got a conviction, wrongly...

With this in mind, I will draw everyone's attention to dated information contained upon Lab' GENERAL EXAMINATION RECORDS, where it is clearly stated that on dates prior to the 20th September 1985, that the ballistic expert used test fired rounds to make comparison with the batch of crime scene ammunition - on 12rh, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985...

[scipio_usmc]

Before I finally get around to detailing the ultimate test of the gun which can prove that the silencer was not fitted to the rifles barrel at the time Sheila was shot and killed, I want to spell it out that there was an unofficial test firing of rifle, silencer and control. bullets, long before the official test fire of the same, which took place between the 20th September and 2nd October 1985. If I can prove that an earlier test fire of the gun and silencer had indeed taken place beforehand, it surely throws into doubt the overall integrity of the firearms and ballistics evidence relied upon by the prosecutions case to make sure that they got a conviction, wrongly...

With this in mind, I will draw everyone's attention to dated information contained upon Lab' GENERAL EXAMINATION RECORDS, where it is clearly stated that on dates prior to the 20th September 1985, that the ballistic expert used test fired rounds to make comparison with the batch of crime scene ammunition - on 12rh, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985...

Sorry but your longwinded drawn out posts have a history of ending the same way. You drag it out and then your anti-climactic end is a complete thud where your claims fall apart completely.   

It doesn't matter how many bullets were test fired, whether it took place one day or multiple days doesn't tend to establish any wrongdoing that would support your claims of multiple guns being used on the victims.

This smacks of your bogus claims of there having been 3 suppressors which you still maintani though you not only have no evidence at all to support but worse was thoroughly rejected already as nonsense.

You have a long history of throwing sh!t at the wall to see if anythign sticks but nothing does.

The stuff you posted about June committing the killings had no legs and neither does your claim that police shot Sheila/ mulitple guns were use don the victims.

I don't understand why you think you are helping Jeremy with outrageous claims that when the public at large reads causes them to dismiss all of us who post here as nuts.

With that kind of reputation even when there is an accurate point that can be made it winds up being dismissed simply because of the source instea dof being viewed on the merits.  You might want to consider that.

[mike tesko]

Before I finally get around to detailing the ultimate test of the gun which can prove that the silencer was not fitted to the rifles barrel at the time Sheila was shot and killed, I want to spell it out that there was an unofficial test firing of rifle, silencer and control. bullets, long before the official test fire of the same, which took place between the 20th September and 2nd October 1985. If I can prove that an earlier test fire of the gun and silencer had indeed taken place beforehand, it surely throws into doubt the overall integrity of the firearms and ballistics evidence relied upon by the prosecutions case to make sure that they got a conviction, wrongly...

With this in mind, I will draw everyone's attention to dated information contained upon Lab' GENERAL EXAMINATION RECORDS, where it is clearly stated that on dates prior to the 20th September 1985, that the ballistic expert used test fired rounds to make comparison with the batch of crime scene ammunition - on 12rh, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985...

Furthermore...

In his lab' working notes, the ballistic expert, Fletcher, wrote the following just before he commenced the first of the official test fire of the rifle, silencer and 27 remaining control rounds (originally 29), he wrote, "I do not know when the rifle was last fired"...

Basically, Fletcher the scum bag is a fucking dirty no good lying bastard...

He should be arrested immediately and charged with perverting the course of justice, and conspiracy...

Bring back hanging, just for him, and people like him...

The fucking Evil no good bastard...

[mike tesko]

I am going to post the evidence on here to prove to everybody that the prosecutions ballistic expert, Fletcher, is nothing but a fucking scum bag, like all those who believe that the ballistics evidence somehow proves that Sheila did not kill herself, and therefore Jeremy must have done it, what an absolute load of bollocks....

Jeremy Bamber killed no-one, actually...

[mike tesko]

Sorry but your longwinded drawn out posts have a history of ending the same way. You drag it out and then your anti-climactic end is a complete thud where your claims fall apart completely.   

It doesn't matter how many bullets were test fired, whether it took place one day or multiple days doesn't tend to establish any wrongdoing that would support your claims of multiple guns being used on the victims.

This smacks of your bogus claims of there having been 3 suppressors which you still maintani though you not only have no evidence at all to support but worse was thoroughly rejected already as nonsense.

You have a long history of throwing sh!t at the wall to see if anythign sticks but nothing does.

The stuff you posted about June committing the killings had no legs and neither does your claim that police shot Sheila/ mulitple guns were use don the victims.

I don't understand why you think you are helping Jeremy with outrageous claims that when the public at large reads causes them to dismiss all of us who post here as nuts.

With that kind of reputation even when there is an accurate point that can be made it winds up being dismissed simply because of the source instea dof being viewed on the merits.  You might want to consider that.

FUCK OFF, you are a scum bag, a lying bastard like the rest of the conspirators, and the we hate Bamber lunatics...

[mike tesko]

Jeremy Bamber killed nobody...

[mike tesko]

I have not yet outlined the ultimate test of the gun which, I truly believe will prove that when police shot Sheila under the chin, that there was not a silencer fitted to the barrel of the anshuzt rifle...

But, before then I have specific points to make, so that scumbags cannot make unrealistic claims without knowing the absolute truth about connected or linked matters...

[mike tesko]

I am prepared to respond to anyone being serious about any issue, but I fucking detest scumbag liars, who do not even know the truth about what they are saying. I mean, if you are going to say something, at least do a bit of research to find out if what you are saying is the truth, or not...

[scipio_usmc]

FUCK OFF, you are a scum bag, a lying bastard like the rest of the conspirators, and the we hate Bamber lunatics...

If I were then I would not be trying to get people to discuss actual facts and evidence and instead resort to nonsubstantive discussion. 

If there is truly some test scientifically reliable that could establish whether a suppressor was attached or not you should be able to explain it and provide some scientific support.  There is no such thing as science so new that it would be admissible in a court and yet not have any books, journals etc about it.

If such exists I would welcome it.

The problem is that I can find no such thing and you seem to be going off on a tangent again about multiple guns being used and bullets being taken form tests and planted instead.

[mike tesko]

If I were then I would not be trying to get people to discuss actual facts and evidence and instead resort to nonsubstantive discussion. 

If there is truly some test scientifically reliable that could establish whether a suppressor was attached or not you should be able to explain it and provide some scientific support.  There is no such thing as science so new that it would be admissible in a court and yet not have any books, journals etc about it.

If such exists I would welcome it.

The problem is that I can find no such thing and you seem to be going off on a tangent again about multiple guns being used and bullets being taken form tests and planted instead.

FUCK OFF, either talk about truthful things or else count me out of playing any role in your pantomime, I'm fucking sick to death of corrupted police, judiciary, CCRC, Judges of appeal, fucking twisting everything and anything to get thier view point across to the masses, they are all liars, evil fucking individuals who are not interested in whether or not Bamber is innocent, or not...

[mike tesko]

FUCK OFF, either talk about truthful things or else count me out of playing any role in your pantomime, I'm fucking sick to death of corrupted police, judiciary, CCRC, Judges of appeal, fucking twisting everything and anything to get thier view point across to the masses, they are all liars, evil fucking individuals who are not interested in whether or not Bamber is innocent, or not...

And Bamber is innocent, he didn't shoot his sister under the chin and kill her, the police did it...

[mike tesko]

I will continue with a true account of what did take place, in so far as the involvement of the ballistic expert (Fletcher), and testing he carried out or knew about, prior to the date of the so called official test fire of the rifle, silencer and control ammunition - Fletcher is a liar, was a liar, and always will be a liar, details contained on lab' GENERAL EXAMINATION RECORDS, signed and dated in Fletchers name, bear witness to this FACT. He knew perfectly well, when the rifle had last been fired prior to the commencement of the first of the official test fire of the same, on 20th September 1985. Fletcher is corrupt was corrupt, he lied about an important feature of the evidence - he used control ammunition fired in the rifle, to make comparison tests with crime scene ammunition, on 12th, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985. He must have known when the rifle had been fired after the shootings, because he used control ammunition to complete comparison tests between control rounds fired through the silencer, against the batch of crime scene ammunition...

Fletcher is a lying scumbag, as I say, bring back hanging just for him and all the evil lying scumbags, who think nothing of saying anything, just for the sake of saying it...