Would the trial result in a different verdict if held in 2014 ?

[wilf]

Barry Georges retrial or its aftermath proves one important lesson. the establishment hate to be proved wrong............ok he's innocent but not innocent enough to be compensated.
Mrs May seems to be unafraid to tackle the old boy attitude in the police lets hope the same can be said for the legal system modern society deserves a more rapid open and accountable system.

[nugnug]

if the system thought it would result in a guilty verdict jeremy would get a retrial tomorrow.

[guest154]

if the system thought it would result in a guilty verdict jeremy would get a retrial tomorrow.

No it wouldn't. Nothing you are saying makes any sense. Why would they re-try someone to get another guilty verdict? Are they going to re-try EVERYONE who says they are innocent in prison, or just the ones you believe are innocent.

The appeals process is there for a reason and can't just be ignored when it comes to a prisoner you like.

[Alias]

what i cant understand  is if certan people are that confidant hes guilty and that confident hes never geting out why do they bother.

I think that the only cases that keep people interested are the unsolved ones and the ones where there is  some doubt about guilt or innocense. This case has kept people interested for almost thirty years now, there are lots of doubts! Also for the "guilters" - they wouldn´t use all this time on the case otherwise - they are here to convince themselves.   

[nugnug]

well thats what im thinking if your convinced you have won an argument why carry on arguing.

[Alias]

well thats what im thinking if your convinced you have won an argument why carry on arguing.

Why indeed! 

[scipio_usmc]

well thats what im thinking if your convinced you have won an argument why carry on arguing.

Why should we let people who are convinced he is innocent make ridiclous claims unopposed just because he is in jail?

You want such so you can propaganzdize in peace and hope to fool some people.  You don't like being challenged?  Too bad.

[Adam]

adam scipio_usmc mat one qustion if your so convinced a retrial would reach the same verdict why dont you wnt one to happen.

I have never said I do not want a retrial.

Whatever the legal system decides I respect.

Jeremy has to get through the CCRC & COA first. He did not in 2012.

Re trials are rare. Doubtful he will get one.

[lookout]

 Don't you think you're getting a bit carried away ? Ridiculous claims ? So are some of yours too !

 What makes you think your opinions are any better than anyone else's ?

 We're all in the same boat-------------we're pi55ing in the wind,simply because we weren't there. It could go one way or the other,,who cares as long as justice is done and seen to be done.

It would appear to me that it's you who doesn't like to be challenged because you think you know it all.Tuff !

[scipio_usmc]

Don't you think you're getting a bit carried away ? Ridiculous claims ? So are some of yours too !

 What makes you think your opinions are any better than anyone else's ?

 We're all in the same boat-------------we're pi55ing in the wind,simply because we weren't there. It could go one way or the other,,who cares as long as justice is done and seen to be done.

It would appear to me that it's you who doesn't like to be challenged because you think you know it all.Tuff !

I support my claims with evidence.  I don't make irrational claims.  I have no problem being challenged.  I like to debate that is why I post on forums like this.  To me it is fun to argue.

While you might think it is rational to suggest the things you do most people disagree.  You even suggested that June shoudl be tested for gunshot residue and spatter from other victims because you think she might have been involved in shooting some of them.  You tried to backtrack and pretend you didn't accuse her of such but there is no need to test someone fro GSR and spatter unless you suspect they did some of the shooting.  SO trying to pretend you didn't make the accusation fails.

On my worst day and your best I could still run circles around you on this case even though I only started researching it 2 months ago and that is why you have a problem with me.  You have a problem with those who challenge you because they have evidence to back up their positions and you offer crazy specualtion with nothing to support it. SO you wish they would just go away and leave your silly claims unimpeached. 

[susan]

Hello lookout I have seen your views challenged many many times on this forum and you take it on the chin and respond in a fair manner.  You post what you believe and we should all respect that we all have different views and none of us "know it all"

[nugnug]

Why should we let people who are convinced he is innocent make ridiclous claims unopposed just because he is in jail?

You want such so you can propaganzdize in peace and hope to fool some people.  You don't like being challenged?  Too bad.

i never said i dident like being challenged i just asked a question.

why are you bothered about if your certain hes not getting  out.

and saying other peoples opinions are propaganda suggests. you dont like yours questioned.

[Adam]

Some people think a re trial would be a nightmare for Jeremy.

Source available upon request.

[nugnug]

well he obviosly dosent.

[susan]

Adam source please