The Noble Cause Framing Theory

[Jan]

I names the policeman , so I guess the site would be risking a lot by publishing it if it was not true.

[lookout]

I just read the  interesting article on the  official website about victim support in relation to WHF,
something I did not know was what happened to Junes rings. Jeremy had refused the request from Anne Eaton to have the rings because they had never left his mothers fingers and he wanted them to remain there- so he assumed that they had been I guess cremated with his mother . In 2013 he found out that a police officer had ( illegally) removed the rings after the autopsy and given them to Anne. Had anyone else heard that ? I guess it is otherwise there would be a big fuss about him telling lies.

So Jeremy was so greedy,,he didn't want the rings to flog,then ?? Strange !

I hadn't heard anything about the rings on June,but I'd read that AE took other jewellery for " safe-keeping ".

[Jan]

here is the link

http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/victim-support/support-at-the-scene/family-home-is-a-crime-ccene/media-intrusion/psychological-impact-and-implications-for-recovery/social-and-relationships/advocacy

[lookout]

 I'm sickened too,Alias. It's the pits !

[susan]

Alias if this story is true it is quite the worst thing I have heard to remove jewellery from a dead persons hands is disgusting and unforgivable.

[Caroline]

I just read the  interesting article on the  official website about victim support in relation to WHF,
something I did not know was what happened to Junes rings. Jeremy had refused the request from Anne Eaton to have the rings because they had never left his mothers fingers and he wanted them to remain there- so he assumed that they had been I guess cremated with his mother . In 2013 he found out that a police officer had ( illegally) removed the rings after the autopsy and given them to Anne. Had anyone else heard that ? I guess it is otherwise there would be a big fuss about him telling lies.

I have read this before in one of the books - however, it wasn't a police office that was mentioned, it was one of the undertakers. I will see if I can find it.

[lookout]

here is the link

http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/victim-support/support-at-the-scene/family-home-is-a-crime-ccene/media-intrusion/psychological-impact-and-implications-for-recovery/social-and-relationships/advocacy

That's absolutely devastating

I've never read anything so sickening.

[lookout]

 Thankyou Jansus for bringing this to our attention. No wonder nobody wants Jeremy out of prison !

[Alias]

Not only is this disgusting, but was it not illegal to do this? Ewww, I get all the pictures in my head.

DS Davidson, a name to remember. Where is he now?

[Jane]

To me, such an act highlights that the rellies never regarded Jeremy as being a member of the family.

[lookout]

 Blatantly obvious,,April. I can't begin to imagine how Jeremy felt when he heard that one,,after everything else he had to endure. It's a miracle the man's stayed sane.

[Alias]

I have read this before in one of the books - however, it wasn't a police office that was mentioned, it was one of the undertakers. I will see if I can find it.

An undertaker can do this, but only after asking the next of kin. In this case Jeremy, who was next of kin, said NO. The rings should have been left on June´s hand.
If it was this Davidson, I would say it was illegal.

[Jan]

It could have been an undertaker that removed them - but if they ended up in AE possession through the police then that says a lot. after all at that stage Jeremy was not a convicted man .

I would think the site would be risking a lot by this statement and even if it was in a book it says that JB did not find out who got them until 2013- so perhaps the writer did not know this.

[lookout]

 I'd have said it was bloody theft !

[Caroline]

An undertaker can do this, but only after asking the next of kin. In this case Jeremy, who was next of kin, said NO. The rings should have been left on June´s hand.
If it was this Davidson, I would say it was illegal.

I read that Jeremy was a bit snappy with the undertaker who had removed the rings. Jeremy insisted that he put them back, but the undertaker didn't. he later gave them to someone in the family or the police - I don't remember which. I can't remember where I read it but it may have been in Colin's book - I'll see if I can find it.