Jeremys second phone call to Julie:

[Jane]

All I want is a link.

Grahame, has it not dawned on you that whenever Adam finds himself in the odur, he blames it on the OS :D

[Jane]

I have just quoted 4 witnesses. A hand written diary & Jeremys 3.26 phone call to the police.

All showing Jeremy called Julie at 3.00am = guilty.

You haven't PROVED the call was at 3 am, only CLAIMED it was. Don't you know the difference?

[Jane]

I have just quoted 4 witnesses. A hand written diary & Jeremys 3.26 phone call to the police.

All showing Jeremy called Julie at 3.00am = guilty.

NONE of whom can give an exact time.

[grahameb]

How can I provide a link for what the OS have not said ? Dhhh

Well why bring the official site into the argument then? The only evidence you have is that all the 3 girls agreed together that Jeremy phoned at 3am. Before that JM said he phoned ay 3.20am. I suggest to you that they just got together and agreed on a particular time. I mean one girl always set her clock fast. The other wasn't exactly sure and JM herself stated that it was around 3.20. It doesn't sound very definite to me. In actual fact a later time would be a more natural occurance.

[Adam]

You haven't PROVED the call was at 3 am, only CLAIMED it was. Don't you know the difference?

I am afraid I have proved it. Read the first page of this thread & Julies diaries. A mountain of evidence.

Where is the evidence showing Jeremy phoned Julie after the police. None.

The judge mentioned the 3am call in his summing up. Very damaging.

[Adam]

Well why bring the official site into the argument then? The only evidence you have is that all the 3 girls agreed together that Jeremy phoned at 3am. Before that JM said he phoned ay 3.20am. I suggest to you that they just got together and agreed on a particular time. I mean one girl always set her clock fast. The other wasn't exactly sure and JM herself stated that it was around 3.20. It doesn't sound very definite to me. In actual fact a later time would be a more natural occurance.

The most damaging witness said her digital clock said 2 something.

Oh dear.

[Jane]

I am afraid I have proved it. Read the first page of this thread & Julies diaries. A mountain of evidence.

Where is the evidence showing Jeremy phoned Julie after the police. None.

The judge mentioned the 3am call in his summing up. Very damaging.

YOU have proved NOTHING. As for digesting what you twist and present as truth, I wasn't born yesterday, Adam.

[Adam]

I appreciate that Jeremys supporters have to rubbish all the evidence showing Jeremy phoned Julie at 3am.

But sometimes you have to accept it happened.

Jeremy being awake at 3am does not make him guilty. But he needs to say why he told police he was sleeping 'like a log' & Nevilles call woke him. His answering machine strangly switched off.

[lookout]

The most damaging witness said her digital clock said 2 something.

Oh dear.

Was this " damaging " witness aware that Sheila was still alive at that time ? And also at 7am onwards ?

[Adam]

Was this " damaging " witness aware that Sheila was still alive at that time ? And also at 7am onwards ?

So it was Sheila barking like a dog.

[Jane]

So it was Sheila barking like a dog.

Do as you always do, Adam. Believe what you want.

[Adam]

YOU have proved NOTHING. As for digesting what you twist and present as truth, I wasn't born yesterday, Adam.

I will post the documents again. How can I twist documents ?

[Adam]

http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

[Adam]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=255.0

[Jane]

I will post the documents again. How can I twist documents ?

Would you like me to list them? Shall we start with just about ALL of what Dr F said of Sheila?