Jeremys second phone call to Julie:

[Caroline]

Seemed like every man an his dog were keeping diaries!! 

[grahameb]

Not if the 7th August 85 page is already full.

The first entries on that date would be the 3am & 5.40am phone calls. Adding them on at the bottom of page would be too obvious.

Think logically Graheme.

Use you common sense Adam. A diary is always written after the event. I personally would like to see when she actually started her diary?

[Adam]

Jeremys Official Site has to say why he phoned Julie at 3am.

Or prove that he did not. All the evidence is pointing against him & showing his guilt.

[grahameb]

Jeremys Official Site has to say why he phoned Julie at 3am.

Or prove that he did not. All the evidence is pointing against him & showing his guilt.

Link please.

[lookout]

Jeremys Official Site has to say why he phoned Julie at 3am.

Or prove that he did not. All the evidence is pointing against him & showing his guilt.

Besides your " official site " being information from the red forum,,which site/link did they glean it from ?

[Adam]

Link please.

Link.

Read the post. Jeremys OS 'has' to say...

So far they have not said.

[grahameb]

Link.

Read the post. Jeremys OS 'has' to say...

So far they have not said.

You said you always privide links. So where is this link please?

[lookout]

You've forgotten the source,Graham. With Adam,,it's sauce ( source ) with everything.

[Jane]

Julies diaries also say Jeremy called her at 3am.

Sorry I forgot to mention that in the thread post.

And can you validate for us the exact time it was thought to be judicious for Julie to begin writing a diary?

[Adam]

You said you always privide links. So where is this link please?

Use you're brain.

The OS is always claming he is innocent.

They have to prove he did not phone Julie at 3am. They have not.

All the evidence shows he did. Four witnesses, a diary & the fact that Jeremy spent several minutes from 3.26am on the phone with the police. So could not have phoned Julie at 3.30am.

It is highlighting certain guilt.

[grahameb]

Use you're brain.

The OS is always claming he is innocent.

They have to prove he did not phone Julie at 3am. They have not.

All the evidence shows he did. Four witnesses, a diary & the fact that Jeremy spent several minutes from 3.26am on the phone with the police. So could not have phoned Julie at 3.30am.

It is highlighting certain guilt.

All I want is a link.

[Jane]

Use you're brain.

The OS is always claming he is innocent.

They have to prove he did not phone Julie at 3am. They have not.

All the evidence shows he did. Four witnesses, a diary & the fact that Jeremy spent several minutes from 3.26am on the phone with the police. So could not have phoned Julie at 3.30am.

It is highlighting certain guilt.

Isn't it somewhat difficult to prove something that no one seems to be positive about to start with. I would have called it a case of "Take Your Pick" which is clearly what you've done.

[Adam]

All I want is a link.

How can I provide a link for what the OS have not said ? Dhhh

[Adam]

Isn't it somewhat difficult to prove something that no one seems to be positive about to start with. I would have called it a case of "Take Your Pick" which is clearly what you've done.

I have just quoted 4 witnesses. A hand written diary & Jeremys 3.26 phone call to the police.

All showing Jeremy called Julie at 3.00am = guilty.

[Caroline]

How can I provide a link for what the OS have not said ? Dhhh

You haven't proven that the call was at 3am - just claiming it isn't a fact Adam!!