He stood right at the foot of each bed to shoot the boys. The shots fired into the masterbedroom were all fired to the right of the bed near the door.
There is no evidence he fired a weapon anytime recently let laone was agreat shot. The surprise factor as well as shooting at close range enabled him to hit his targets but he needed so many rounds to kill them because he wasn't a good enough shot to fatally wound them right away.
Sheila not only never loaded or fired a gun before she had the added problem of her medication's side effects which cause tremors and dexterity problems. For her landing all 25 shots at all would have been difficult even considering the ranges invovled and Nevill woul dhave little reason to call Jeremy to disarm her instead of doing so himself.
So you disagree with the majority of guilty club members then, who state quite categorically and allegedly quote family members that he was a crack shot? You of course realise that you are contradicting David Boutflour who stated that he was a crack shot?
The guilty party's whole case depend upon this statement. They say that every shot hit its target and therefore Sheila who is supposedly not to know anything about guns could not possibly had done it. But Jeremy they say. Now he was a crack shot because every shot hit the taget.
Now you are saying that all those on the gulty side are wrong and that there was no evidence that Jeremy was a very good shot?
Thank you scipio. I take your "expert" opinion about the opinion of the whole of the guilty side.
