0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Then he doesn't realize he is talking about the varnish and is way off base in the blood suggestion. He didn't mention blood the other day he just mentioned the varnish chip the photograph expert claims he could see in the photo that the court and everyone else laughed at him for.
This is what Lookout is referring to;
Thanks Caroline. It's making me wince just looking at it. I bet it was painful,though--------------------
The photo isn´t very clear.Looks like Sheila had long toenails from this photo.
Well your picture is the left foot, the one I posted is the right in which the nail looks short.
But Sheila easily could have done it without leaving any footprints though she had barefeet and would have cut hers to boot on the stuff on the floor?Anytime you claim Jeremy would have had evidence the same applies to Sheila is she were the killer. The only difference is she had the additional hazard of cutting her feet and the additiona way of leaving fingerprints because she didn't have gloves though Jeremy did.Finally, he was not inspected after the murders and could have cleaned up and changes his clothes. Shewould have no reaosn to do so.Her body and clothing was actually inspected for evidence like gunshot residue, back spatter, and injuries, his wasn't. So we can say she lacked any such evidence we don't know whether he did lack such evidence.
Was a piece of her toenail found in the kitchen?
He is talking about varnish missing from her toenail. Not that the nail itself had been broken.
They look like different feet !
That foot looks as if it has been traipsing around the house to me?