Because of my interest in this case and some people's belief that lies are never told under oath, I've asked all my friends, one of whom has just retired from the bench, what they thought of those who lie under oath. Naturally, they were appalled at the thought and it was very much a question of British justice rules. Then I asked if they would tell the same, undiluted truth if it was their child who was likely to loose everything if the story they were telling couldn't be verified. Whilst I'm FULLY aware that everyone WANTED to say that they would tell the truth, the truth was that they couldn't lie when asked such a totally unexpected question, and the best answer I received, after long silences from them all, was that they HOPED they'd be able to tell the truth, but many said they'd do anything to protect their child. I have to say I rather imagine that I would, too.