Author Topic: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?  (Read 6804 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #60 on: March 20, 2014, 08:07:PM »
April great minds think alike ;D ;D ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #61 on: March 20, 2014, 10:00:PM »


Caroline, he has a HUGELY overblown sense of his own value and importance. He CLAIMS to have made important discoveries but appears to be the only one who thinks so. Sadly there is presently no treatment for grandiose personality disorders.

He has made one - he's JUST found out that Neil is an Admin on the forum and NOT a mysterious man!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D. Other than that - his discoveries = 0
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #62 on: March 20, 2014, 10:52:PM »
He has made one - he's JUST found out that Neil is an Admin on the forum and NOT a mysterious man!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D. Other than that - his discoveries = 0

Well, that is brilliant, we´ve got to give him that!  :P

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #63 on: March 20, 2014, 10:56:PM »
Well, that is brilliant, we´ve got to give him that!  :P

 ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #64 on: March 21, 2014, 07:47:AM »
He has made one - he's JUST found out that Neil is an Admin on the forum and NOT a mysterious man!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D. Other than that - his discoveries = 0

Caroline, you are one of the regular 15 -20 posters on here. Together with the one supporter on the red forum & the one or two people who work on Jeremys OS, that
 is not much support for Jeremy In the country. 

You have refused to say how Sheila committed the crime.

You have refused to say what Sheila was doing when Neville made his mysterious call to Jeremy.

You have refused to say whether Jeremy planned to phone the police.

You have said nothing constructive on this thread. Apart from focusing on me again.


You must improve in assisting Jeremy in his campaign for freedom. Jeremy needs you're support.

 
« Last Edit: March 21, 2014, 07:48:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #65 on: March 21, 2014, 07:50:AM »


Maggie, I don't believe Adam is capable of an original thought. Just about everything his laid before us are other peoples' thoughts, written without quotes, to try and convince us that they're his.

Give me an original thought.

Tell me what Sheila could have been doing when Neville made his mysterious call to Jeremy. Or you can't ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #66 on: March 21, 2014, 07:52:AM »


Caroline, he has a HUGELY overblown sense of his own value and importance. He CLAIMS to have made important discoveries but appears to be the only one who thinks so. Sadly there is presently no treatment for grandiose personality disorders.

You must improve April.

Jeremy has badly failed in three appeals. Just coming on here and posting about me will not assist him. 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #67 on: March 21, 2014, 07:58:AM »
In continuing to be immoveable in your wish for Jeremy to remain in prison,,you've NOT ONCE even bothered to look at every post,link,or anything else that gives a suggestion that things might not be as " cut and dried " as you imagine them to be.
So many anomalies within the police force itself should be questioned,,besides other departments who were also involved,,the pathologist,for instance.
So much held back from the defence in which to advance with their side of the case,,which made the case itself one-sided. Not only that,,but Michael Turner QC told the judges in Jeremys' 2002 appeal that, I quote " If non-disclosure is a fact,it would be difficult to conclude other than it was withheld deliberately " unquote. ( as said by a professional  !)

Even a barristers hands were tied because of lack of evidence on the side of the defence.
There were no Human Rights at the time Jeremy was convicted,,but they can be easily pre-dated,,as the conviction was most definitely unsafe to say the least.

What was held from the defence ? Sources with you're answers please. Don't just make it up.

I will repost my question on another thread. You failed to answer. It is important you can prove you know what was said in court as you keep saying what the jury were told or not told.

Is that the 2002 appeal where the COA said 'The more we look at the case, the more we beleive the jury were right' ?
« Last Edit: March 21, 2014, 08:04:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #68 on: March 21, 2014, 08:00:AM »
lookout excellent post.  Adam has tunnel vision and is not interested in anything we have to say he is using this forum as a platform to spread his poison and be rude and abusive to other posters he behaves like a child seeking attention but in saying that he knows how far to go with his rudeness and abuse he takes it to the line but as yet has not gone over but he will.

When have I been rude on this thread ?

Try to contribute to the thread. You rarely make any valuble contribution. You just post about me.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2014, 08:05:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #69 on: March 21, 2014, 08:03:AM »
Good grief! What a claim!. You probably discovered the Piltdown Man as well I suppose?

Yes Jeremy is guilty.

The phone call to the police saying Neville phoned him was very incriminating.

But why did Jeremy phone ? As already said it was a decision made on the night to explain Neville being in the kitchen.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #70 on: March 21, 2014, 08:07:AM »
Adam I will really try harder and start some interesting threads like you just be patient with me I will get there promise :'( ;D ;D ;D you are not rude at all just downright ignorant.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #71 on: March 21, 2014, 08:07:AM »
lookout  he makes his own threads :'( and thinks because he has created the thread everything he posts on it is evidence.

When was you're last thread ?

Maybe you will create one in 2015 after you have read Mason Doyles book.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #72 on: March 21, 2014, 08:08:AM »
Adam just have to answer your post again you are cracking me up are you for real or just a programmed parrot ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #73 on: March 21, 2014, 08:11:AM »
Adam we have enough with you boring the forum to death without me starting and I might say driving posters away with your utter rubbish. Have you been sacked or what you usually go to work ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?
« Reply #74 on: March 21, 2014, 08:14:AM »
Hi Adam, interestingly Jeremy could get out of Jail on a technicality, apparently Jeremy Bamber has information which if presented in court would result in his almost immediate release. 

It seems there is a statute of law which rules there is a maximum of 28 days which is acceptable between being committed for trial and having the indictment signed. In Jeremy's case the indictment was signed 1 day too late ie. 29 days. 

If the indictment was invalid then everything which followed it was invalid as well.  Therefore this means Jeremy Bamber's conviction is void but he refuses to go down this route and is determined to prove himself innocent in the court of Appeal. 

This is taken from Scott Lomax's book with quotes from Jeremy Bamber ... page 238.

So Jeremy could get released tomorrow. But refuses to.

He has his Campaign for Freedom site, blog & Youtube videos which seems to contradict this.

His 2012 application for freedom did not get referred to the COA. He should get this release & continue to protest his innocence. Which would be easier outside. After 29 years inside you would think he would want to get out.

'Only I know what really happened that night'.