Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?

[Jane]

This is why the guilters hate Scott Lomax's book and claim it's biased.  We know he supports Jeremy but that's because he researched the book and found the evidence stacked up in Jeremy's favour. 

He also supported Barry George and he was right in that case. 

I don't think Jeremy realised his trial and jail term was invalid until he'd been in prison for about 20 years.  Interestingly, we don't ever hear this ever mentioned by the guilters.

Maggie, perhaps we could start a new thread on all the things Adam never mentions or chooses to ignore..................................on second thoughts, perhaps we should just lock those he puts up that are a waste of space

[maggie]

Maggie, perhaps we could start a new thread on all the things Adam never mentions or chooses to ignore..................................on second thoughts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Maybe not, I don't find him that interesting,April. 

[Reader]

There were no Human Rights at the time Jeremy was convicted

If that were the case, why bother with a trial?

It seems there is a statute of law which rules there is a maximum of 28 days which is acceptable between being committed for trial and having the indictment signed. In Jeremy's case the indictment was signed 1 day too late ie. 29 days.

If 8th May is 1 day after 7th May, 4th June is 28 days after 7th May.

By the way, what has being released on a technicality got to do with the evidence?

[susan]

Maggie cannot understand how you do not find Adam interesting he is the light of my life

[maggie]

If that were the case, why bother with a trial?
If 8th May is 1 day after 7th May, 4th June is 28 days after 7th May.

By the way, what has being released on a technicality got to do with the evidence?

Hi Reader, I can only conclude 7th May is included in the calculation although I am just repeating what is written in Lomax's book and not claiming to be an expert.

It has nothing to do with him being innocent but is interesting that JB has never tried to use it to get out of prison on a technicality.

[lookout]

If that were the case, why bother with a trial?
If 8th May is 1 day after 7th May, 4th June is 28 days after 7th May.

By the way, what has being released on a technicality got to do with the evidence?

Exactly,Reader. A violation of a defendants right,and if what Michael Turner QC had said was right, about withheld documents which were deprived from the defence at the time,,then there should not have been a trial at all. If all the relevant information wasn't intact,,then the trial was an unfair one.

[maggie]

Exactly,Reader. A violation of a defendants right,and if what Michael Turner QC had said was right, about withheld documents which were deprived from the defence at the time,,then there should not have been a trial at all. If all the relevant information wasn't intact,,then the trial was an unfair one.

If the 7th May to 4th June is inclusive then the trial should never have gone ahead anyway and the trial was an unfair one.

[grahameb]

Hi Adam, interestingly Jeremy could get out of Jail on a technicality, apparently Jeremy Bamber has information which if presented in court would result in his almost immediate release. 

It seems there is a statute of law which rules there is a maximum of 28 days which is acceptable between being committed for trial and having the indictment signed. In Jeremy's case the indictment was signed 1 day too late ie. 29 days. 

If the indictment was invalid then everything which followed it was invalid as well.  Therefore this means Jeremy Bamber's conviction is void but he refuses to go down this route and is determined to prove himself innocent in the court of Appeal. 

This is taken from Scott Lomax's book with quotes from Jeremy Bamber ... page 238.

Yes I remember reading that as well Maggie.

[maggie]

Yes I remember reading that as well Maggie.

Would be interested to hear Adam's thoughts on this Grahame but I would hazard a guess we won't, maybe because he doesn't have any??

[Caroline]

The topic is the title 'Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?'

Try to contribute. My last two threads made important discoveries that Jeremy is certainly guilty & he did not plan to phone the police.

Hopefully this thread will also make some good discoveries.

You haven't made ANY important discoveries in ANY of your threads, you just repeat the same old crap under a different title that usually doesn't make sense!!

What exactly do you want me to contribute to? The title doesn't make any sense (unsurprisingly).

[Jane]

You haven't made ANY important discoveries in ANY of your threads, you just repeat the same old crap under a different title that usually doesn't make sense!!

What exactly do you want me to contribute to? The title doesn't make any sense (unsurprisingly).

Caroline, he has a HUGELY overblown sense of his own value and importance. He CLAIMS to have made important discoveries but appears to be the only one who thinks so. Sadly there is presently no treatment for grandiose personality disorders.

[grahameb]

Would be interested to hear Adam's thoughts on this Grahame but I would hazard a guess we won't, maybe because he doesn't have any??

Perhaps Wilkes forgot to mention it?

[Jane]

Would be interested to hear Adam's thoughts on this Grahame but I would hazard a guess we won't, maybe because he doesn't have any??

Maggie, I don't believe Adam is capable of an original thought. Just about everything his laid before us are other peoples' thoughts, written without quotes, to try and convince us that they're his.

[susan]

April  I can think of a very appropriate treatment for Adam 

[Jane]

April  I can think of a very appropriate treatment for Adam 

Yes, but THAT'S not allowed over here, Susan, although I understand it's done frequently in Thailand