Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?

[grahameb]

The topic is the title 'Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?'

Try to contribute. My last two threads made important discoveries that Jeremy is certainly guilty & he did not plan to phone the police.

Hopefully this thread will also make some good discoveries.

Good grief! What a claim!. You probably discovered the Piltdown Man as well I suppose?

[susan]

Adam doubt whether your new thread will make anymore discoveries as it has not made any upto now

[susan]

Ha Ha Ha nice one lookout he is so full of his own self importance it is unreal and think he is on the forum as the Jester

[lookout]

In continuing to be immoveable in your wish for Jeremy to remain in prison,,you've NOT ONCE even bothered to look at every post,link,or anything else that gives a suggestion that things might not be as " cut and dried " as you imagine them to be.
So many anomalies within the police force itself should be questioned,,besides other departments who were also involved,,the pathologist,for instance.
So much held back from the defence in which to advance with their side of the case,,which made the case itself one-sided. Not only that,,but Michael Turner QC told the judges in Jeremys' 2002 appeal that, I quote " If non-disclosure is a fact,it would be difficult to conclude other than it was withheld deliberately " unquote. ( as said by a professional  !)

Even a barristers hands were tied because of lack of evidence on the side of the defence.
There were no Human Rights at the time Jeremy was convicted,,but they can be easily pre-dated,,as the conviction was most definitely unsafe to say the least. 

[susan]

lookout excellent post.  Adam has tunnel vision and is not interested in anything we have to say he is using this forum as a platform to spread his poison and be rude and abusive to other posters he behaves like a child seeking attention but in saying that he knows how far to go with his rudeness and abuse he takes it to the line but as yet has not gone over but he will.

[lookout]

Ha Ha Ha nice one lookout he is so full of his own self importance it is unreal and think he is on the forum as the Jester

A demitasse would fit his head like a sombrero.

What a saddo,in a rush to make his OWN thread ! Notice how he sticks to them,rather than anyone else's ?? Mikes threads,for instance,,why doesn't he follow them ? Nah,,too difficult. No,,he'd rather stay with those in which he's pre-planned,,,like his OWN. 

[Jane]

Ha Ha Ha nice one lookout he is so full of his own self importance it is unreal and think he is on the forum as the Jester

Well, if we're forced to have a token idiot on the forum, I suppose he'll have to do, won't he.

[susan]

lookout  he makes his own threads and thinks because he has created the thread everything he posts on it is evidence.

[lookout]

Well, if we're forced to have a token idiot on the forum, I suppose he'll have to do, won't he.

I suppose,April.  Glad to see he's not letting his education get in the way of his ignorance.

[Jane]

A demitasse would fit his head like a sombrero.

What a saddo,in a rush to make his OWN thread ! Notice how he sticks to them,rather than anyone else's ?? Mikes threads,for instance,,why doesn't he follow them ? Nah,,too difficult. No,,he'd rather stay with those in which he's pre-planned,,,like his OWN.

Lookout, I suggested last night that he took himself over to Mike's thread but he didn't seem too keen.

[lookout]

Oh,,I see,April. I didn't see that. Interesting.

[Jan]

Lookout, I suggested last night that he took himself over to Mike's thread but he didn't seem too keen.

  Wonder why?

[maggie]

So the idea that Jeremy only wants to walk out of prison with a quashed conviction is fanciful.

So why has he not got released on a technicality ? Thought everyone connected to the investigation were dodgy to say the least.

Hi Adam, interestingly Jeremy could get out of Jail on a technicality, apparently Jeremy Bamber has information which if presented in court would result in his almost immediate release. 

It seems there is a statute of law which rules there is a maximum of 28 days which is acceptable between being committed for trial and having the indictment signed. In Jeremy's case the indictment was signed 1 day too late ie. 29 days. 

If the indictment was invalid then everything which followed it was invalid as well.  Therefore this means Jeremy Bamber's conviction is void but he refuses to go down this route and is determined to prove himself innocent in the court of Appeal. 

This is taken from Scott Lomax's book with quotes from Jeremy Bamber ... page 238.

[Jane]

Hi Adam, interestingly Jeremy could get out of Jail on a technicality, apparently Jeremy Bamber has information which if presented in court would result in his almost immediate release. 

It seems there is a statute of law which rules there is a maximum of 28 days which is acceptable between being committed for trial and having the indictment signed. In Jeremy's case the indictment was signed 1 day too late ie. 29 days. 

If the indictment was invalid then everything which followed it was invalid as well.  Therefore this means Jeremy Bamber's conviction is void but he refuses to go down this route and is determined to prove himself innocent in the court of Appeal. 

This is taken from Scott Lomax's book with quotes from Jeremy Bamber ... page 238.

No good Maggie. NOW, if WILKES had said it.................................

[maggie]

No good Maggie. NOW, if WILKES had said it.................................

This is why the guilters hate Scott Lomax's book and claim it's biased.  We know he supports Jeremy but that's because he researched the book and found the evidence stacked up in Jeremy's favour. 

He also supported Barry George and he was right in that case. 

I don't think Jeremy realised his trial and jail term was invalid until he'd been in prison for about 20 years.  Interestingly, we don't ever hear this ever mentioned by the guilters.