Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?

[Adam]

Well apparently the prosecution can find new evidence that proves that he did the crime and appeal for a retrial. That is where the modern laws have superceeded the Magna Carta which stated that a man cannot be tried for the same crime twice.

They can indeed.

There may be enough new evidence to put Jeremy straight back in the dock after a technical release. The new evidence would not prevent a release on a technicality if there has been a malpractice.

It is less likely Jeremy would be put back in the dock if the conviction was quashed. Unless new evidence appeared years later.

[lookout]

That is a bit unfair isn't it ?

Once released you are a free man. It is up to that person what they do.

The law works in " mysterious " ways,,and I'm really not sure whether someone who's been released on a technicality has the same rights in pursuing a case,,as one whose sentence has been overturned or quashed. i.e. making a claim on his estate.

[susan]

Hello Grahame I have already told Adam about the Birmingham 6 the Guildford 4 the Cardiff 3 he is not interested at all as he does not want to believe police can be corrupt he lives in a fantasy world maybe it would do him good to read these cases along with many many more.

[Adam]

So Jeremy could be stuck between a rock & a hard place.

He has enough missed crossed 'T's on documents to get released on a technicality. But knows there is enough evidence to put him straight back into the dock. But he is not able to get the conviction quashed.

Realistically this is not the case. His 1989 appeal was based on a technicality. His 2002 & 2012 appeals were attempts to get released. He would have no control whether the COA released him on a technicality or completely quashed the conviction. He just wanted a release.

[Adam]

So the idea that Jeremy only wants to walk out of prison with a quashed conviction is fanciful.

So why has he not got released on a technicality ? Thought everyone connected to the investigation were dodgy to say the least.

[grahameb]

If I was in the same situation as Jeremy I would take anything that would get me out of prison. Escape to a desert island and make a new life for myself. Sod society sod this corrupt system and sod the corrupt police force. I would just disappear and take the treasure map that the old man gave me whilst I was in the Bastille. Go to Monte Cristo Island and live forever on the wealth. Oops! sorry about that. Got carried away a bit then.

[lookout]

For all any of us know,,Jeremy could have refused point blank to go out on a technicality.Why should he ? He's fought this long for the truth so why accept anything less than for the case to be quashed. He knows in his own mind that he's innocent and because he's not your " regular criminal " he wishes for things to be open and above board.In other words,because he's told the truth all along,I'd imagine that his greatest wish would be for the world to know,,and to prove,, that he was imprisoned because of an enormous injustice and not because he murdered anyone.

[Adam]

If released on a technicality he would be free to protest his innocence to the world. Appear on television, be interviewed by newspapers. He could still legally try to get the conviction totally quashed.

But as I said, he has no choice about whether the COA decides to quash the conviction or release him on a techniality. At present the COA has done neither.

So if it such a corupt case why has he failed to get released on a technicality ?

[Alias]

If released on a technicality he would be free to protest his innocence to the world. Appear on television, be interviewed by newspapers. He could still legally try to get the conviction totally quashed.

But as I said, he has no choice about whether the COA decides to quash the conviction or release him on a techniality. At present the COA has done neither.

So if it such a corupt case why has he failed to get released on a technicality ?

It is hard to get released on a technicality when all of the physical evidence (almost all) has been ILLEGALLY destroyed and when, who knows what and how much is withheld under PII.
You don´t stand a chance, do you?

[lookout]

If released on a technicality he would be free to protest his innocence to the world. Appear on television, be interviewed by newspapers. He could still legally try to get the conviction totally quashed.

But as I said, he has no choice about whether the COA decides to quash the conviction or release him on a techniality. At present the COA has done neither.

So if it such a corupt case why has he failed to get released on a technicality ?

I've already tried to explain to you that I'm not sure that Jeremy would have the same rights if he was released on a technicality. This is why he doesn't want that,because he mightn't be permitted to take the case any further than if his sentence was overturned or quashed.Besides the fact that he wants the truth,,not some small blip that somebody happened to make,resulting in his conviction.

[Caroline]

Another ridiculous title that doesn't even make sense. I honestly don't know why people keep responding! I have no problem with your stance but there is no rhyme or reason to any of your threads. People are supposed to keep on topic but I couldn't honestly ask anyone to do that on your threads because it's never clear what the topic is?

[Adam]

I've already tried to explain to you that I'm not sure that Jeremy would have the same rights if he was released on a technicality. This is why he doesn't want that,because he mightn't be permitted to take the case any further than if his sentence was overturned or quashed.Besides the fact that he wants the truth,,not some small blip that somebody happened to make,resulting in his conviction.

I have already told you Jeremy has no choice how he gets released. Prisoners don't.

Or did Jeremy make his 2012 application confident he would have his conviction totally quashed. Rather than being released on a technicality ?  It could not have been that good as his application was not referred to the COA.

[Adam]

Another ridiculous title that doesn't even make sense. I honestly don't know why people keep responding! I have no problem with your stance but there is no rhyme or reason to any of your threads. People are supposed to keep on topic but I couldn't honestly ask anyone to do that on your threads because it's never clear what the topic is?

The topic is the title 'Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?'

Try to contribute. My last two threads made important discoveries that Jeremy is certainly guilty & he did not plan to phone the police.

Hopefully this thread will also make some good discoveries.

[Jane]

The topic is the title 'Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?'

Try to contribute. My last two threads made important discoveries that Jeremy is certainly guilty & he did not plan to phone the police.

Hopefully this thread will also make some good discoveries.

Whilst they may have made sense to your twisted logic, it, very doubtful that they made sense to anyone else.

[lookout]

The topic is the title 'Why has Jeremy failed to get released on a technicality ?'

Try to contribute. My last two threads made important discoveries that Jeremy is certainly guilty & he did not plan to phone the police.

Hopefully this thread will also make some good discoveries.

You're as much use to the case as a woodpecker with a rubber beak !