what new evidence?

[Jane]

I have done my resarch thanks.

Most of what you say I have never read anywhere. You never provide links or sources.

Which is hardly surprising when you tell us MOST of yours is centred around what Wilkes says.

[Adam]

Which is hardly surprising when you tell us MOST of yours is centred around what Wilkes says.

Not true. I have read all the internet articles. Lots of transcripts & witness statements. As well as forums.

I have repeatedly said this.

[lookout]

Thank you Tyler. That was what I was looking for.

Although this bad conduct has been documented,,it wouldn't be in Jeremys' interest to bring the subject to light,really,,unless of course it can be used later once he's released. I don't know.
The rellies aren't likely to do much,or anything because of their friendship with EP. I wonder what their feelings on the matter,are.? It would be interesting, seeing that the Bambers were their relatives too.
Though something tells me that the rellies are more concerned as to whether Jeremy gets released,rather than think about their relatives who were abused in such a way. By rights,,I suppose they could have sued if they'd known ?

[Adam]

You obviously haven't done your research or you wouldn't ask so many questions. All of which the answers are somewhere on this forum. Ever tried the Archives ?? No,,I bet you haven't.

Why don't you do what I do & back up you're posts with evidence ? You never have although I have requested this from you. You know I am not going to spend hours going through all the threads on here. Are you like Susan & only read from here ?

You know a lot about what the jury were told/not told. I requested the court transcripts from you.  I got no response.

[susan]

Adam Ha Ha you would be very surprised if you knew where Susan reads don't underestimate Susan big mistake Adam

[lookout]

Ha ha,,Susan,,I've more or less said similar on the other thread.

[tyler]

What exactly do you want me to source for you Adam?

[grahameb]

I've given Adam sources before. But they still don't convince him. So I've given up. Even very simple basic things about the case he doesn't know. He still just blindly fumbles about not learning anything new.

[grahameb]

What exactly do you want me to source for you Adam?

Hey Tyler I've sent you a message. Read your in box.

[susan]

Ha Ha Grahame brown or red I like it

[Adam]

Adam Ha Ha you would be very surprised if you knew where Susan reads don't underestimate Susan big mistake Adam

You said you only read from here & do not want to read anywhere else in case it says bad things about Jeremy which upset you.

But you will read Mason Doyles book. When published.

[Adam]

What exactly do you want me to source for you Adam?

[Adam]

Adam,the photo's of the officers 'larking about' were from a batch previously witheld from Jeremy and his defence. Some time back they were allowed to view them but NOT make copies of them as they didn't want them ending up in the public domain. They were said to depict certain officers "horsing around" with the bodies still in situ and an officer/s on the roof of whf holding a banner reading "we are here". Officers offered to burn the most bloodied of items in whf,ie mattresses,bed covers,sections of carpet when they had finished with the house as a crime scene. They had already taken all the samples that they wanted,including carpet samples. The form Jeremy was asked to sign by EP to give permission is in the public domain. It may very possibly be viewed somewhere on this forum.

[Adam]

Thank you Tyler.

I have never read any of this before today.

Looking forward to the link/source.

[Adam]

I've given Adam sources before. But they still don't convince him. So I've given up. Even very simple basic things about the case he doesn't know. He still just blindly fumbles about not learning anything new.

Yeah yeah.

So what new evidence is there from this thread.

Conversations in the house - dead in the water.

Two bodies - dead in the water.

Bizarre police banners - unproven. Nothing to do with the case.

Police urinating outside - unproven. Not new evidence.

EP unbelievably putting bodies in lewd positions - Unproven. Desparate as well.