Author Topic: what new evidence?  (Read 28029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #180 on: March 18, 2014, 12:06:PM »
Adam,the photo's of the officers 'larking about' were from a batch previously witheld from Jeremy and his defence. Some time back they were allowed to view them but NOT make copies of them as they didn't want them ending up in the public domain. They were said to depict certain officers "horsing around" with the bodies still in situ and an officer/s on the roof of whf holding a banner reading "we are here". Officers offered to burn the most bloodied of items in whf,ie mattresses,bed covers,sections of carpet when they had finished with the house as a crime scene. They had already taken all the samples that they wanted,including carpet samples. The form Jeremy was asked to sign by EP to give permission is in the public domain. It may very possibly be viewed somewhere on this forum.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #181 on: March 18, 2014, 12:20:PM »
 That would make the strongest amongst us feel physically sick.
 It is on the forum somewhere because Mike started the thread. It's an utter disgrace,as well as heartbreaking for Jeremy,,and those concerned should have been punished for their indecent conduct but---------------

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #182 on: March 18, 2014, 12:23:PM »
Adam,the photo's of the officers 'larking about' were from a batch previously witheld from Jeremy and his defence. Some time back they were allowed to view them but NOT make copies of them as they didn't want them ending up in the public domain. They were said to depict certain officers "horsing around" with the bodies still in situ and an officer/s on the roof of whf holding a banner reading "we are here". Officers offered to burn the most bloodied of items in whf,ie mattresses,bed covers,sections of carpet when they had finished with the house as a crime scene. They had already taken all the samples that they wanted,including carpet samples. The form Jeremy was asked to sign by EP to give permission is in the public domain. It may very possibly be viewed somewhere on this forum.

Source please.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #183 on: March 18, 2014, 12:25:PM »
Use your eyes,Adam. It'll be in the Archives on THIS forum.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #184 on: March 18, 2014, 12:28:PM »
I wonder if the rellies knew what their " friends " were up to ??

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #185 on: March 18, 2014, 12:37:PM »
98% of the original documents that are held by both EP and the PII,are when the case was first confirmed as 4 murders and a suicide.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #186 on: March 18, 2014, 12:43:PM »
Source please. I gave you Jim Shellys source saying he requested this.

'Not so'. Please elaborate on why they would ask for Jeremys permission to do something at their own crime scene.

Actually why would the police want to dispose of the carpets or other items at all ? It makes no difference to their investigation whether the carpet stays or goes. It is not theirs to dispose of & is more work for them to dispose of. It is also potential evidence.

Jeremy encouraged them & requested they did it.
Again I use your own question against you quote from Adam: "It was their crime scene to do what they felt appropriate. unquote.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #187 on: March 18, 2014, 12:45:PM »
So this is the document which Jeremy used to claim Sheila was alive inside WHF.

Oh dear.
No he didn't use this document.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #188 on: March 18, 2014, 12:48:PM »
Adam,the photo's of the officers 'larking about' were from a batch previously witheld from Jeremy and his defence. Some time back they were allowed to view them but NOT make copies of them as they didn't want them ending up in the public domain. They were said to depict certain officers "horsing around" with the bodies still in situ and an officer/s on the roof of whf holding a banner reading "we are here". Officers offered to burn the most bloodied of items in whf,ie mattresses,bed covers,sections of carpet when they had finished with the house as a crime scene. They had already taken all the samples that they wanted,including carpet samples. The form Jeremy was asked to sign by EP to give permission is in the public domain. It may very possibly be viewed somewhere on this forum.
Thank you Tyler. That was what I was looking for.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #189 on: March 18, 2014, 12:52:PM »
Thank you Tyler. That was what I was looking for.

Source please.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #190 on: March 18, 2014, 12:53:PM »
Source please.
Tomato or brown?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #191 on: March 18, 2014, 12:55:PM »
Adam,,if you're interest is within this case,then I suggest that you do your own research like we all have done,,instead of looking stupid.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #192 on: March 18, 2014, 12:58:PM »
Adam,,if you're interest is within this case,then I suggest that you do your own research like we all have done,,instead of looking stupid.

I have done my resarch thanks.

Most of what you say I have never read anywhere. You never provide links or sources.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #193 on: March 18, 2014, 01:01:PM »
I have done my resarch thanks.

Most of what you say I have never read anywhere. You never provide links or sources.





You obviously haven't done your research or you wouldn't ask so many questions. All of which the answers are somewhere on this forum. Ever tried the Archives ?? No,,I bet you haven't.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #194 on: March 18, 2014, 01:04:PM »