Author Topic: what new evidence?  (Read 28027 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #90 on: March 17, 2014, 07:49:PM »
Are you saying the defence should have used this log to suggest there were conversations with Sheila ?

Everyone knows there was not.

If you can not answer the question then just :-X

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #91 on: March 17, 2014, 07:52:PM »
Banners & urinating. How is that evidence ?

And how did Jeremy get these pictures ?

And who an earth took them & why ?

And why didn't the police just dump them if processed ?  They are nothing to do with anything.

Are you for real? If they did exist it is all about the crime scene and how it was treated. Lets face it even if it was murder suicide the scene should have been treated as such and evidence preserved. I cant believe you even made that comment.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #92 on: March 17, 2014, 07:53:PM »
there were conversations with somebody it would seem.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #93 on: March 17, 2014, 07:56:PM »
Are you for real? If they did exist it is all about the crime scene and how it was treated. Lets face it even if it was murder suicide the scene should have been treated as such and evidence preserved. I cant believe you even made that comment.

Banners & urinating outside (alledgedly). How is that evidence ?

And why an earth erect a banner ?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2014, 08:02:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #94 on: March 17, 2014, 07:57:PM »
Are you for real? If they did exist it is all about the crime scene and how it was treated. Lets face it even if it was murder suicide the scene should have been treated as such and evidence preserved. I cant believe you even made that comment.

How did Jeremy get these pictures ?

Thought the police were holding this not very serious evidence under PPI.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #95 on: March 17, 2014, 07:59:PM »
Are you for real? If they did exist it is all about the crime scene and how it was treated. Lets face it even if it was murder suicide the scene should have been treated as such and evidence preserved. I cant believe you even made that comment.

Who an earth took the pictures & why ?

Why would the police  take pictures of other police urinating ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #96 on: March 17, 2014, 08:00:PM »
How did Jeremy get these pictures ?

Thought the police were holding this not very serious evidence under PPI.



Rhetoric, Adam. How the hell would any of us know from where Jeremy could obtain pictures.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #97 on: March 17, 2014, 08:01:PM »
Are you for real? If they did exist it is all about the crime scene and how it was treated. Lets face it even if it was murder suicide the scene should have been treated as such and evidence preserved. I cant believe you even made that comment.

What is evidence relating to the massacre ? Banners or outside urinating ?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2014, 08:10:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #98 on: March 17, 2014, 08:09:PM »
Adam can you not see if all this did happen at WHF it shows what a bunch of disrespectful waste of space police officers were involved and one would have to question anything they reported on the crime scene.  I really cannot understand how you have to question jansus.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #99 on: March 17, 2014, 08:11:PM »
What is evidence of the massacre ? Banners or outside urinating ?



Either would suggest that the police didn't treat the crime scene with the respect it deserved LOR which you SAID they did.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #100 on: March 17, 2014, 08:12:PM »
What did the banner say ?
Probably said, "MORE DONUTS".

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #101 on: March 17, 2014, 08:13:PM »
Adam if this did happen police uinating and another taking a photo they obviously thought it was all a big joke and shows the level of their intelligence and does not say much for EP and maybe this is why they had a bad reputation as being useless.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #102 on: March 17, 2014, 08:14:PM »
Adam can you not see if all this did happen at WHF it shows what a bunch of disrespectful waste of space police officers were involved and one would have to question anything they reported on the crime scene.  I really cannot understand how you have to question jansus.

Let Jeremy show the pictures he claims he has before people start bad mouthing the EP again. I do not beleive any of it.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #103 on: March 17, 2014, 08:14:PM »
People go off topic in my threads. Including you. Although to be fair you did answer my question of what Sheila was doing when Neville phoned Jeremy.
Yes they do and so do I. It is a fault common to us all. But this one went off topic from the start.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: what new evidence?
« Reply #104 on: March 17, 2014, 08:16:PM »
Probably said, "MORE DONUTS".

Why erect a banner ? I cannot see any reason to.

It was front page news. The press could have taken a picture of it.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.