Author Topic: foster care.  (Read 15311 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
foster care.
« on: March 03, 2014, 06:32:PM »
where the twins ever in foster care?

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: foster care.
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2014, 06:33:PM »
nugnug I believe they had been in daytime care not sure about full time care.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: foster care.
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2014, 06:36:PM »
nugnug I believe they had been in daytime care not sure about full time care.


Susan, it was probably when Sheila was in hospital the first time. It definitely sounds as if it was more than nursery care.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: foster care.
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2014, 06:39:PM »
well its something that came up in the new video id never heard of the twins being in foster care before.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: foster care.
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2014, 06:41:PM »
well its something that came up in the new video id never heard of the twins being in foster care before.



What isn't clear is if it was something privately arranged OR arranged in conjunction with Social Services.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: foster care.
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2014, 06:43:PM »
there was a link on this post by Patti but does not work now

Hi Buddy

The children had been in foster care and there is a statement by social services regarding burn marks to one of the children.....Here it is.....

One, thing I do agree with you what I wrote is very flawed indeed....:)


Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: foster care.
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2014, 06:44:PM »


What isn't clear is if it was something privately arranged OR arranged in conjunction with Social Services.
I thought it was day care through Social Services  that the twins had but your right it isn't clear April.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: foster care.
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2014, 06:49:PM »
Maggie/April  I thought it was through Social Services did not one of the Social workers comment on Sheila being a cigar smoker (the proper fat ones)

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: foster care.
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2014, 06:50:PM »
jansus yes I remember this now think one of the children had bruises and I remember discussing this with steve uk.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: foster care.
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2014, 06:52:PM »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: foster care.
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2014, 06:54:PM »
jansus yes I remember this now think one of the children had bruises and I remember discussing this with steve uk.



Am I correct in thinking that no Social Worker was called to give evidence and no WS from SS was read out?

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: foster care.
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2014, 07:09:PM »
april Indeed I think you are correct tyler is on the forum she will know for sure ;D

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: foster care.
« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2014, 08:15:PM »
I have read somewhere that the twins were in foster care (day care) for a period of time, and that it worked out well for all involved. No idea why it didn´t continue. I think I read it in cennection with Colin Cafell, sonmething he said in a statement? Sorry, simply cannot remember.
But because I have read this (and I am 100% positive I have), I have never understood why Bamber-guilters always say that Jeremy made it up that foster care had been discussed that fateful night. The twins already HAD been in foster care, so it is quite probable it was discussed again.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: foster care.
« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2014, 08:20:PM »
Alias  alas the guilter supporters always seem to want to rubbish anything Jeremy has said which is positive and seem to want to portray him as a total liar at every opportunity :'(

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: foster care.
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2014, 08:22:PM »
I have read somewhere that the twins were in foster care (day care) for a period of time, and that it worked out well for all involved. No idea why it didn´t continue. I think I read it in cennection with Colin Cafell, sonmething he said in a statement? Sorry, simply cannot remember.
But because I have read this (and I am 100% positive I have), I have never understood why Bamber-guilters always say that Jeremy made it up that foster care had been discussed that fateful night. The twins already HAD been in foster care, so it is quite probable it was discussed again.
That is right Alias, i believe also that it was confirmed after the murders that the idea of day care had been discussed with a local woman?
I suppose it is ignored because it doesn't fit with their scenarios in the same way JB HAS to be a psychopath  ......
« Last Edit: March 03, 2014, 08:25:PM by maggie »