Author Topic: 72 page witness statement of Ann Eaton, made to COLP on 14 / 08/ 1991  (Read 46737 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: 72 page witness statement of Ann Eaton, made to COLP on 14 / 08/ 1991
« Reply #435 on: February 28, 2014, 10:52:PM »
I don't think that she would know what the defence would ask her in court ? Would rather defeat the point would it not? As far as I am concerned a statement should be a written record of what happened . I cant imagine why she would need so many sessions to "get it right"
That's why she bawled her ruddy eyes out when questioned by them.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
Adam, was it this video?

<iframe width=\"420\" height=\"315\" src=\"//www.youtube.com/embed/XWhJ4EY-xyM\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen></iframe>

No. Not this. It was even more mellow. It was a pro Jeremy video.

Thanks for looking.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Because they knew that Neville had confiscated some resin from Pargeter's brother and had put it in the safe.

What possible reason would Neville have for confiscating some cannabis resin and keeping it in his safe. As a magistrate I'm sure he was aware of the consequences of possession. He would have distroyed it or flushed it. Unless he was somehow involved in the business or smoked it himself.  The letter Jeremy distroyed could have been incriminating to Neville. Where did the money that Jeremy knew was in Neville's wallet come from? The envelope described by AE sounds very similar to those described by JM when she was telling police about Jeremy's Scotland drug connection.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Lebaleb HELLO :) I was given to understand that the cannabis was to do with a member of the Pargeter family who had stayed at the farm because of his addiction. How true, I leave for you to decide.

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
I appreciate that it was assumed to belong to one of the Pargeters. What I am saying is that if one finds illicit drugs belonging to someone, you don't logically put them in your safe.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Lebaleb,,I would have thought that the best/safest place was the safe.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
I appreciate that it was assumed to belong to one of the Pargeters. What I am saying is that if one finds illicit drugs belonging to someone, you don't logically put them in your safe.
They were growing the stuff in a field.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
lebaleb no you don't put them in the safe you smoke them ;D ;D sorry for being flippant but the sun is shining maybe if you knew who they belonged to you would put them in the safe to keep them safe from visiting children.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
lebaleb no you don't put them in the safe you smoke them ;D ;D sorry for being flippant but the sun is shining maybe if you knew who they belonged to you would put them in the safe to keep them safe from visiting children.
Or you could put it in a cake then we would all be of the opinion of, "Who cares maaaaan?"

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Grahame I know somebody who put resin seeds into a cake and her husband gave the Vicar slices of it and he went away with a hop skip and a jump hey ho ;D ;D ;D

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Grahame I know somebody who put resin seeds into a cake and her husband gave the Vicar slices of it and he went away with a hop skip and a jump hey ho ;D ;D ;D
;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
It puts an entirely different slant on " brownies ". ;D

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
''The cannabis in my safe? Your Honour. Well, I found it and I put it in there for safekeeping. It's not mine.''

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
They were growing the stuff in a field.

The feild was opium for medicinal purposes. Jeremy was growing it at Goldhanger. According to JM the police had seen the plants and Jeremy was upset at having to distroy them. If that is true, it's strange that the police didn't prosecute him for cultivation.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
The feild was opium for medicinal purposes. Jeremy was growing it at Goldhanger. According to JM the police had seen the plants and Jeremy was upset at having to distroy them. If that is true, it's strange that the police didn't prosecute him for cultivation.

I thought I had read it was NB who was quite a progressive farmer who had a licence to grow opium for medical uses - did not realise it was destroyed?