72 page witness statement of Ann Eaton, made to COLP on 14 / 08/ 1991

[Adam]

Well, unless we're to believe what emerges from the mouth of a Sun reporter, there WERE no pictures because HAD there been, the Sun WOULD have bought them, if only to be able to say they had them.

I have already posted the article.

It goes into great detail of his meeting with Jeremy & Brett. Great detail for an apparent lie.

[susan]

April my dear  so so sorry forgive me

[Jane]

I have already posted the article.

It goes into great detail of his meeting with Jeremy & Brett. Great detail for an apparent lie.

That's the Sun for you you, Adam.

[Adam]

It's easy when you're miles away.A rat always leaves a sinking ship !

Sinking ship ?

[Jane]

April my dear  so so sorry forgive me

Now, let me see?? Yeahhhhhh, You're forgiven

[Jan]

People complain it was too long.

One month sounds realistic. She had to get over the shock. Then could not or refused to believe Jeremy was involved. After accepting he was involved she had to find a way out.

Adam - this is what I mean by you ignoring posts when it does not suit you. I posted JM own words where she said she lay ( after his 3.30 call) in bed - and she knew what he had done. She knew he had killed his family. So what you are saying is not true according to her own words. So why when she went to identify the bodies - with the police - on her own - why did she not say something?

[Adam]

Adam - this is what I mean by you ignoring posts when it does not suit you. I posted JM own words where she said she lay ( after his 3.30 call) in bed - and she knew what he had done. She knew he had killed his family. So what you are saying is not true according to her own words. So why when she went to identify the bodies - with the police - on her own - why did she not say something?

She did say something. After one month. To Liz Rimmington.

[Jan]

I have already posted the article.

It goes into great detail of his meeting with Jeremy & Brett. Great detail for an apparent lie.

this has been discussed SEVERAL  times before and when you discuss things it is prudent to put the other side of the story as well.But you chose not to.What a surprise

I agree if those pictures existed they would have published them - end of .

[Jan]

She did say something. After one month. To Liz Rimmington.

One month -and not even to the police then.

She could have done it the next day - she said twice in her statement she knew what he had done - then she had to make ANOTHER statement to explain why she had not done anything before.

As I said the next day when alone with the police would of been an ideal opportunity.

[tyler]

If Julie believed that Jeremy was responsible for the murders,then WHY did she testify in court that when she went along to identify the bodies of the victims,she asked them (or wanted to) what had happened? Hoping that the dead would talk to her. If she already knew the answer,why did she want to ask the question? I understand that this statement from her baffled the court too!

[Adam]

this has been discussed SEVERAL  times before and when you discuss things it is prudent to put the other side of the story as well.But you chose not to.What a surprise

I agree if those pictures existed they would have published them - end of .

A very detailed lie then.

Article already posted.

[Adam]

One month -and not even to the police then.

She could have done it the next day - she said twice in her statement she knew what he had done - then she had to make ANOTHER statement to explain why she had not done anything before.

As I said the next day when alone with the police would of been an ideal opportunity.

Not to the police indeed. A woman scorned ?

She was young & under Jeremys spell. Jeremy told her he was watertight & it was an open & shut case. She was in a difficult situation. But did the right thing.

[lookout]

JM was ALWAYS a step ahead of Jeremy,,as she was the wise,but crafty one------not him,,and she certainly wasn't under anyones' spell,least of all Jeremys'. Difficult situation ? It certainly wasn't when she took the 25 grand ( hush money ) was it ? That wasn't difficult to encourage her to take it and run.

[Adam]

JM was ALWAYS a step ahead of Jeremy,,as she was the wise,but crafty one------not him,,and she certainly wasn't under anyones' spell,least of all Jeremys'. Difficult situation ? It certainly wasn't when she took the 25 grand ( hush money ) was it ? That wasn't difficult to encourage her to take it and run.

Jeremy was very popular with women. Having affairs with older women.A younger Julie could easily fall for him. She did.

Wise & crafty ? She was a 20 year old student sharing college digs.

[Adam]

JM was ALWAYS a step ahead of Jeremy,,as she was the wise,but crafty one------not him,,and she certainly wasn't under anyones' spell,least of all Jeremys'. Difficult situation ? It certainly wasn't when she took the 25 grand ( hush money ) was it ? That wasn't difficult to encourage her to take it and run.

I have already mentioned Jeremys NOTW deal & attempt to sell pictures of Sheila.