0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Adam - you do not get the meaning of discussion or debate - you just make statements - posters give you their opinion - you either ignore it ( if you don't know the answer) or return with another statement or opinion that you can not possibly know if is true or not. I sincerely hope you are not a law student or we are all doomed.You have with all your posts achieved one thing - I am even more convinced that JB is innocent because if all your posts that you have made , based on hearsay and some imaginary world inside your own head are the best you can come up with then I am happy to side on the "innocent" side .
Patti/Alias I do like you both
Jeremy leaving the bodies to be found would still be a suspect. Especially with Neville having put up a fight. Sheila would have been the main suspect. But the relatives would still not believe it & there was only one other person who had a motive to kill those five people. Other people have agreed today no one would believe a random stranger massacre or that the person who found the bodies (Barbara Wilson ?) committed the crime. Although Jeremy if under pressure may suggest the random stranger scenario. Jeremy may have been interviewed straight away by the police & been a suspect much sooner. Especially if he showed indifference to the deaths. He would have no alibi. So it makes sense for Jeremy to phone the police & lead them in a direction on the back of Nevilles call. Giving himself an alibi at the same time which cannot be disproven. The police did not know Jeremy and would surely never believe Jeremy would committ such a horrific crime. It also makes sense to phone Chelmsford police station, which was seven miles further away from WHF than Witham. Jeremy said he did not phone 999 because it 'did not occur to him' although dialling 999 is quicker than looking for a phone number & will result in a quicker response time. The longer the delay between his 3.26am phone call & the discovery of the bodies, the more it gets into everyones mind sets that there really is a crazy woman with a gun still alive inside. Jeremy could spend several hours continuing to enlighten everyone about his 'nutter' sister & Nevilles phone call /alibi. The Raid Team would automatically be called in a seige situation. Delaying things by several more hours. Jeremys Neville phone alibi is becoming more plausible by the minute. He 'should have been an actor'.Having the police pick Jeremy up would have been even better still. It would have shown him as having just got dressed & rushing into their car. Giving the impression he had been at home all night & woken up by Nevilles call. It is also another alibi, showing Jeremy did not phone from WHF. However the police refused Jeremys request & told him to make his own way. Jeremy did the next best thing & arrived after the police. Driving very slowly. So the phone call to the police meant Jeremy could work with & assist the police. Use his charm to become their buddies. Give them his version of events & look upset when the bodies are discovered. By 9am that morning & for the next few weeks, Neville's alibi had worked.Jeremys supporters say 'why phone the police if you are not innocent'? Another equally good question is 'why not phone the police if guilty ' ?
There is a certain poster here that keeps demanding answers. My suggestion is, don´t answer, because that poster does not care and does not remember your answers anyway, so it is a waste of time.I have already answered all the the four points he mentions above, I don´t care to do it again, but I claim that my reasons for Jeremy´s actions are very plausible and logical.
If that's the poster who has nothing to say of any value, I agree entirely.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
I do like you Alias
My scenario (which matches the body location & bullet allocation) would have only taken Jeremy 10 minutes inside WHF.He did the crime at the latest 2.30pm as he rang Mugford around 3pm.
in my opinion that's rubbish. If he had not made the call then the bodies would not have been found until later and then the time of death would have been hard to establish ( not that they got it right anyway) Also in your scenario the house when they got there would have been absolutely quiet and no movement - so there was NO way he would not assume that the police would not already arranged back up because of the information he gave them and go straight in to try and save the children -after all they would have had NO way of knowing they were already dead.Just you trying to get everything to fit your evaluation AGAIN.
Your 19 point were just things you cobbled together. Some were fact about the case, some hearsay and others were your opinion but none of them were highlighted Jeremy's guilt - just things that the guilty side use in there arguments. NOTHING NEW!!!!!
my my what a risk taker , especially as he was under surveillance by the police at the time. And again such planning - but what a mistake to tell JM.