An alibi from Neville is better than no alibi at all :

[Jane]

My dearest Adam I wont and don't want to go round in circles with you, but what you are suggesting is totally false and you do not appear to have a single shred of evidence or factual evidence to support your opinions or scenarios....A crime was committed and we are here to discuss openly many possibilities surrounding the case its self and I wont be drawn into any hearsay or self opinions or scenarios that are circumstantial and would never hold a conviction today based on these alone. Its purely unsafe.

Its not very often I have a go at any poster, but I find you don't debate and constantly repeat your scenarios all day long which is annoying.....I like to debate and love to challenge people but you do not answer questions or consider any alternative but your own.....

All of which backs up my own theory that his only interest in the case OTHER than seeing his own words in print, is to wind up/ridicule/take the p**s/cause as much disruption as possible. Sorry if I can't sound as charitable towards him as you do, but for me, actions speak louder than words, and his actions speak greater volumes than do his childish and repetitive words.

[Adam]

My dearest Adam I wont and don't want to go round in circles with you, but what you are suggesting is totally false and you do not appear to have a single shred of evidence or factual evidence to support your opinions or scenarios....A crime was committed and we are here to discuss openly many possibilities surrounding the case its self and I wont be drawn into any hearsay or self opinions or scenarios that are circumstantial and would never hold a conviction today based on these alone. Its purely unsafe.

Its not very often I have a go at any poster, but I find you don't debate and constantly repeat your scenarios all day long which is annoying.....I like to debate and love to challenge people but you do not answer questions or consider any alternative but your own.....

Totally false ?

You mean Jeremy did dial 999.

You mean Jeremy did not ask to picked up  ?

You mean Jeremy did not phone Chelmsfprd police station ?

You mean three independent witnesses did not testify that Jeremy phoned Mugford around 20 minutes before the police.

[Jane]

Thought this was a discussion forum.

You have not got answers to these 'strange coincidences' so you focus the attention on me again.

You think you're worth it?/

[Adam]

If Jeremy was frightened of the dark, why would Neville phone him ?  He had already phoned the police according to Jeremy.
 

[Adam]

All of which backs up my own theory that his only interest in the case OTHER than seeing his own words in print, is to wind up/ridicule/take the p**s/cause as much disruption as possible. Sorry if I can't sound as charitable towards him as you do, but for me, actions speak louder than words, and his actions speak greater volumes than do his childish and repetitive words.

Focussing on me again.

Lots of Jeremys supporters say he is 'innocent' because he phoned the police.

I have created a thread disagreeing saying it was to Jeremys benefit to phone the police.

Jeremys supporters do not like it as my points are valid. Tough.

[Adam]

Thank you.

Jeremy did not dial 999 because 'it did not occur to him'. This is of course absolute rubbish.

[Alias]

There is a certain poster here that keeps demanding answers. My suggestion is, don´t answer, because that poster does not care and does not remember your answers anyway, so it is a waste of time.
I have already answered all the the four points he mentions above, I don´t care to do it again, but I claim that my reasons for Jeremy´s actions are very plausible and logical.

[Adam]

Jeremy phoned Chelmsford police for two reasons in my opinion -

They were miles away. The longer the 3.26 phone call - body discovery period, the better.

They were more likely to pick him up from the cottage.

[Adam]

They were further away so would not know the exact area as well as Witham police station. They may drive near his cottage & pick him up.

A Witham officer will know how near Jeremy was so will tell him to make his own way.

Mind you, Chelmsford police said the same thing to Jeremy. But it was worth Jeremy asking.

[Adam]

Anyway.

Do Jeremys supporters agree that he is not innocent just because 'he phoned the police' ?

Do Jeremys supporters now agree that if guilty,  ringing the police at 3.26 was the right move ?

If unsure, read page one.

[Jan]

Thank you.

Jeremy did not dial 999 because 'it did not occur to him'. This is of course absolute rubbish.

Adam - you do not get the meaning of discussion or debate - you just make statements - posters give you their opinion - you either ignore it ( if you don't know the answer) or return with another statement or opinion that you can not possibly know if is true or not. I sincerely hope you are not a law student or we are all doomed.

You have with all your posts achieved one thing - I am even more convinced that JB is innocent because if all your posts that you have made , based on hearsay and some imaginary world inside your own head are the best you can come up with then I am happy to side on the "innocent" side .

[Patti]

There is a certain poster here that keeps demanding answers. My suggestion is, don´t answer, because that poster does not care and does not remember your answers anyway, so it is a waste of time.
I have already answered all the the four points he mentions above, I don´t care to do it again, but I claim that my reasons for Jeremy´s actions are very plausible and logical.

I do like you Alias 

[Adam]

Adam - you do not get the meaning of discussion or debate - you just make statements - posters give you their opinion - you either ignore it ( if you don't know the answer) or return with another statement or opinion that you can not possibly know if is true or not. I sincerely hope you are not a law student or we are all doomed.

You have with all your posts achieved one thing - I am even more convinced that JB is innocent because if all your posts that you have made , based on hearsay and some imaginary world inside your own head are the best you can come up with then I am happy to side on the "innocent" side .

What I say is based on facts & is my opinion.

My scenario was my imagination but based on facts.

I ask difficult questions for Jeremys supporters. Such as why was there no message on Jeremys answering machine. Or was it the right move to phone the police. Or why would Neville phone Jeremy, or....

Jeremys supporters do not like it, so focus on me.

[susan]

Alias correct me if I'm wrong is this Adam you are referring to

[Adam]

Second point. Why ? Discuss.