An alibi from Neville is better than no alibi at all :

[Jane]

I do believe that some people have demonised Jeremy.  He does appear to be an either liked or disliked character with there being no middle ground.  I have theory but that is all it is.  I suspect that Jeremy experienced initial shock, pain and anguish when outside WHF with police.  This initial shock then became overlayed with a sense of freedom of movement / action.  He was after all, suddenly presented with an enormous changes in his life, without the shackles of parents being in place.

Roch, he'd have been less than human had he not experienced a GAMUT of emotions after such an horrendous loss. It's hardly surprising that he is SAID to have wondered if he was manic depressive (bi polar) because many of those emotions would have been polarized - loss and freedom side by side can be a very scary thing to experience especially if he had no previous knowledge of it.

[susan]

Adam stop being so childish.

[Roch]

Unluckiest man ever?

Girlfriends, relatives, EP, the courts will all be slaughtered if Jeremy was released.

Perhaps you've hit the nail on the head.  This one is so messy, it's worth hiding behind a cliched prosecution case that can be sold in a repetitive manner to a not very discerning Joe Public.

Cue your own role Adam.

[Adam]

Anyway. The thread.

Why did Jeremy not dial 999 ?

Why did Jeremy dial Chelmsford station ?

Why did Jeremy ring Mugford before the police ?

Why did Jeremy ask the police to pick him up ?

Do people agree that it is a good idea for a (guilty) Jeremy to make 'that' phone call to the police ? My thread suggests it was.

[susan]

Adam short answer NO.

[Roch]

I can only imagine Robert Boutflours reaction, if somebody had tried to mediate and suggest Jeremy Bamber's behaviour was possibly influenced by a bi-polarising of his emotions brought about by the trauma of having lost his family at the hands of his unwell sister.  Likewise AE.

It seems to me that they simply held a kangaroo court among themselves and then the senior family member demanded that the verdict was acted upon by police.

[maggie]

I can only imagine Robert Boutflours reaction, if somebody had tried to mediate and suggest Jeremy Bamber's behaviour was possibly influenced by a bi-polarising of his emotions brought about by the trauma of having lost his family at the hands of his unwell sister.  Likewise AE.

It seems to me that they simply held a kangaroo court among themselves and then the senior family member demanded that the verdict was acted upon by police.

Totally go with you on that Roch, am convinced that's what happened.

[lookout]

Kangaroo court is right !

[Jane]

Anyway. The thread.

Why did Jeremy not dial 999 ?

Why did Jeremy dial Chelmsford station ?

Why did Jeremy ring Mugford before the police ?

Why did Jeremy ask the police to pick him up ?

Do people agree that it is a good idea for a (guilty) Jeremy to make 'that' phone call to the police ? My thread suggests it was.

Why TF don't you write to Jeremy yourself and ask him. WE aren't in the position, unlike how you seem to believe you are, of knowing what was in his head whilst under extreme stress.

[lookout]

Kangaroo court is right !

It pretty well sums up the biased and unfair way that proceedings were conducted.

[Jane]

I can only imagine Robert Boutflours reaction, if somebody had tried to mediate and suggest Jeremy Bamber's behaviour was possibly influenced by a bi-polarising of his emotions brought about by the trauma of having lost his family at the hands of his unwell sister.  Likewise AE.

It seems to me that they simply held a kangaroo court among themselves and then the senior family member demanded that the verdict was acted upon by police.

Roch, I have the feeling that they didn't "do" emotion, they just DID!!!!!!!!!!

[Patti]

Anyway. The thread.

Why did Jeremy not dial 999 ? At the end of the day it would not have made any difference of who Jeremy called first the police came from Whitam regardless.

Why did Jeremy dial Chelmsford station ? He phoned Chelmsford after he called Witham the later was not taking calls that night.

Why did Jeremy ring Mugford before the police ? This can't be proven.

Why did Jeremy ask the police to pick him up ? Maybe he was frightened of the dark

Do people agree that it is a good idea for a (guilty) Jeremy to make 'that' phone call to the police ? My thread suggests it was.

My dearest Adam I wont and don't want to go round in circles with you, but what you are suggesting is totally false and you do not appear to have a single shred of evidence or factual evidence to support your opinions or scenarios....A crime was committed and we are here to discuss openly many possibilities surrounding the case its self and I wont be drawn into any hearsay or self opinions or scenarios that are circumstantial and would never hold a conviction today based on these alone. Its purely unsafe.

Its not very often I have a go at any poster, but I find you don't debate and constantly repeat your scenarios all day long which is annoying.....I like to debate and love to challenge people but you do not answer questions or consider any alternative but your own.....

[maggie]

My dearest Adam I wont and don't want to go round in circles with you, but what you are suggesting is totally false and you do not appear to have a single shred of evidence or factual evidence to support your opinions or scenarios....A crime was committed and we are here to discuss openly many possibilities surrounding the case its self and I wont be drawn into any hearsay or self opinions or scenarios that are circumstantial and would never hold a conviction today based on these alone. Its purely unsafe.

Its not very often I have a go at any poster, but I find you don't debate and constantly repeat your scenarios all day long which is annoying.....I like to debate and love to challenge people but you do not answer questions or consider any alternative but your own.....

Cannot disagree with you Patti 

[Alias]

My dearest Adam I wont and don't want to go round in circles with you, but what you are suggesting is totally false and you do not appear to have a single shred of evidence or factual evidence to support your opinions or scenarios....A crime was committed and we are here to discuss openly many possibilities surrounding the case its self and I wont be drawn into any hearsay or self opinions or scenarios that are circumstantial and would never hold a conviction today based on these alone. Its purely unsafe.

Its not very often I have a go at any poster, but I find you don't debate and constantly repeat your scenarios all day long which is annoying.....I like to debate and love to challenge people but you do not answer questions or consider any alternative but your own.....

Yup.

[Adam]

Why TF don't you write to Jeremy yourself and ask him. WE aren't in the position, unlike how you seem to believe you are, of knowing what was in his head whilst under extreme stress.

Thought this was a discussion forum.

You have not got answers to these 'strange coincidences' so you focus the attention on me again.