Author Topic: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...  (Read 25593 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #150 on: December 28, 2013, 04:42:PM »
If you read my 'Judges possible Curious Coincidences' thread you will see there are a lot of 'curious coincidences' which fit with Jeremy being guilty.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #151 on: December 28, 2013, 04:45:PM »
Adam read it and don't agree with you at all ;D

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #152 on: December 28, 2013, 04:46:PM »
Who deployed the occupants of CA07?

PC West (3:36am), or MB (3:26am)...
« Last Edit: December 28, 2013, 04:47:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #153 on: December 28, 2013, 04:48:PM »
Adam read it and don't agree with you at all ;D

That is a shame as I thought we were starting to agree with each other.

I just agreed that Jeremy was thinking of Julie when he said 'put it down' when asked about Crispy.

Young love,  :)
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #154 on: December 28, 2013, 04:50:PM »
Hi Lovely April..:)

I thought it was family and the police that had encouraged Jeremy to eat something.  I think its normal that others will tell you to have something to eat in such tragic circumstances.  I know when my mum died my it was one of the first things my aunt asked me.."Have you eaten" I said no...but she insisted that I must eat....I'm not sure, but I think some people see eating as making things better.... ;D ;D ;D ;D




Patti HI and :-* Something in my mind told me that was how it was. Just shows you that Adam is very practiced in telling lies, doesn't it. He does it with SUCH confidence...................and there was silly me giving him the benefit of the doubt. Tut tut. Smacked wrists for April, eh!

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #155 on: December 28, 2013, 04:50:PM »
Hi Patti  it is very British in the worst possible circumstances a cup of tea will make it better especially with lots of sugar good for shock. I think people are trying to help and this is the only way they know.  I think Jeremy was given a drop of brandy outside WHF and it made him vomit.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #156 on: December 28, 2013, 04:51:PM »
I've read it and that has nothing to do with the question you're being asked. YOU SAID the phone call is the mist important aspect. So, you must have an alternative explanation??

I just gave an answer.

Is this all you are going to go on about whenever I post ? Two call logs from two different people in different buildings. Both apparently lying for the last 28 years, along with the rest of the EP.

Seems you & Jeremy are going for the technicality. Good luck.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #157 on: December 28, 2013, 04:54:PM »



Patti HI and :-* Something in my mind told me that was how it was. Just shows you that Adam is very practiced in telling lies, doesn't it. He does it with SUCH confidence...................and there was silly me giving him the benefit of the doubt. Tut tut. Smacked wrists for April, eh!

Why would I come on a forum & tell lies.

I discuss the facts, give opinions, create scenarios & give information (rather than telling people to research it themselves).

The facts are there, Jeremy has been in prison for 28 years.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #158 on: December 28, 2013, 04:55:PM »
Adam pity Julie did not think of young love when she sold him down the river ;D had she done it before the murders or IMMEDIATELY following I would have found her statement a little more credible.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #159 on: December 28, 2013, 04:55:PM »
Who deployed the occupants of CA07?

PC West (3:36am), or MB (3:26am)...

Assuming Clock was 10 minutes fast in PC Wests scenario, the occupants of CA07 could not have been deployed any sooner than say two to three minutes into the call received from Jeremy Bamber (3:36 / 3:26am), which puts the decision to deploy CA07 at either 3:38am in PC Wests time zone event, or at 3:28am in MB's time zone event - but the fact that CA07 were deployed at 3:35am, does not equate if the clocks were 10 minutes apart, since if you apply that to MB's time zone event, it would still have meant that the occupants of CA07 had been deployed to the incident at 3:25am...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #160 on: December 28, 2013, 04:56:PM »
The family and Julie didn't believe Jeremy to be innocent because all had a vested interest once a guilty verdict was given. This was something which wasn't drilled into the judge and jury at the time.
All they saw were £SD signs,which clouded their visions of it being anything other than a guilty verdict. Their minds were already made up,,,and why the police believed any of them before a thorough forensic  investigation,beats me. 
EP have a lot to answer to !

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #161 on: December 28, 2013, 04:56:PM »
My explanation is what I said before.

Jeremy phoned Julie for a chat.

Jeremy dialled Chelmsford police station (it did not occur to him to dial 999). Chelmsford police station was miles away ???

Jeremy told PC West about the 'mysterious' (judges words) phone call Neville had made saying 'come quickly, Sheila has gone crazy & she has got the gun'. Luckily, or unluckily Jeremy had switched off the answering machine, so brave Jeremy could answer the phone &  save the day. Although he wanted the police to pick him up !

PC West phoned Witham police station which was 7 miles nearer. The police like to save time when there are nutters with guns involved.

I assume both West & Bonnett filled out call logs. There are differences. So what ?




"So what" Adam!!! SO WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Evidence may be withheld which means an innocent man has spent nearly 30 years in prison and all you can say is "SO WHAT" In my eyes it makes you a disgrace.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #162 on: December 28, 2013, 04:57:PM »
Adam we agree on something Jeremy has been in prison for is it 29 years so why are you trying to prove his guilt :'(

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #163 on: December 28, 2013, 04:57:PM »
Hi Patti  it is very British in the worst possible circumstances a cup of tea will make it better especially with lots of sugar good for shock. I think people are trying to help and this is the only way they know.  I think Jeremy was given a drop of brandy outside WHF and it made him vomit.

Jeremy went into the field & appeared to vomit.

I believe Jeremy himself said nothing came up. Anyway Mugford said Jeremy knew of a way he could make himself sick. But that Mugford has also been lying for 28 years. Hasn't she ?
« Last Edit: December 28, 2013, 04:59:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #164 on: December 28, 2013, 04:58:PM »
Assuming Clock was 10 minutes fast in PC Wests scenario, the occupants of CA07 could not have been deployed any sooner than say two to three minutes into the call received from Jeremy Bamber (3:36 / 3:26am), which puts the decision to deploy CA07 at either 3:38am in PC Wests time zone event, or at 3:28am in MB's time zone event - but the fact that CA07 were deployed at 3:35am, does not equate if the clocks were 10 minutes apart, since if you apply that to MB's time zone event, it would still have meant that the occupants of CA07 had been deployed to the incident at 3:25am...

CA07 were still deployed to the incident one minute (3:25am) before MB's phone log was commenced, at 3:26am...
« Last Edit: December 28, 2013, 05:01:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...