The bedroom phone, phone calls & Neville.

[Jane]

Psychiatrists, social workers. If no one had seen her for 18 weeks, that's a fact. The courts discuss facts.

Do you need to have the difference explained to you? Such a pity that the jury weren't told that she hadn't been seen by psychiatrist for 18 weeks.

[Adam]

Do you need to have the difference explained to you? Such a pity that the jury weren't told that she hadn't been seen by psychiatrist for 18 weeks.

Maybe they were told that.

[Jane]

Maybe they were told that.

Just one of several things the jury weren't privy to which could have changed the outcome of the trial.

[Adam]

Just one of several things the jury weren't privy to which could have changed the outcome of the trial.

How do you know they were not told that ?

People on here make a big thing about it. The defence were not stupid so would have mentioned it to try to create reasonable doubt.

[Jane]

It seems you're still reticent to respond to Post 2788. I can't imagine why when you're usually so vociferous.

[Jane]

How do you know they were not told that ?

People on here make a big thing about it. The defence were not stupid so would have mentioned it to try to create reasonable doubt.

Go look it up for yourself Adam.

[Adam]

It seems you're still reticent to respond to Post 2788. I can't imagine why when you're usually so vociferous.

I did respond. Next.

[Jane]

I did respond. Next.

NO, you didn't. You made an avoidance tactic.

[Adam]

Yeah right.

[Jane]

Yeah right.

So glad you're being truthful enough to admit it.

[Jan]

Did not answer my question in 2838 either.

It seems to me that he believes that if he believes a person is guilty it does not matter by what means they are convicted . The ends justify the means . And I think that just about sums up his attitude. And I have a feeling that is just how the relatives felt. I get the feeling in their minds they decided JB was guilty - so whatever way he got put away - it was ok with them.

That is why it will not matter what we put before Adam - he has made up his mind. End of.

[Jane]

Did not answer my question in 2838 either.

It seems to me that he believes that if he believes a person is guilty it does not matter by what means they are convicted . The ends justify the means . And I think that just about sums up his attitude. And I have a feeling that is just how the relatives felt. I get the feeling in their minds they decided JB was guilty - so whatever way he got put away - it was ok with them.

That is why it will not matter what we put before Adam - he has made up his mind. End of.

Jansus, nor has he responded to 2842.

I think Adam is a proponent of Noble Cause Corruption -that they may convict the wrong person seems not to concern him-  and he appears to have little or no interest in what others may think.

[susan]

Hi Girls you are lucky if Adam answers any of your posts I am still waiting from 2 weeks ago

[Adam]

Hi Girls you are lucky if Adam answers any of your posts I am still waiting from 2 weeks ago

I answer all questions. Do not tell lies.

This is a pro Jeremy site. So people get very upset with me as my arguments supporting his conviction are so strong. It is hard to answer every point as there are often 3 or 4 people bombarding me at the same time.

[Adam]

Sorry Roch was too busy answering everyone else.

What point are you making ?