Thank you for clarifying that Adam, this thread is an interesting read. Lots of opinions and ideas.
I still lean to "guilty as charged" simply because Jeremy had the motive, the means and the opportunity. Plus a lot of what he said after just does not add up for me.
I don't want an innocent man behind bars but equally I don't want a man capable and willing of shooting two six year old children in the head walking free. I still tend towards guilt in Jeremy's case.
Granted the original police investigation was botched because...well they dealt with things differently then AND they thought they were dealing with murders/suicide.
Dunno WHAT to think about Julie Mugford....she and I are about the same age....I thik back to those times and wonder if I could have acted as she did...knowing that two children had been murdered. No I could not have done...I would have gone straight to the police if I thought my boyfriend had been guilty of such a heinous crime.
Then again she says he told her that a hit man did the killing......personally if I had been in her position I wold have been very very afraid.
Droosie hello. I think, whatever our stance we can agree that Julie was a girl who thought with her head rather than her heart. I imagine her agenda, despite perhaps being emotionally drawn towards teaching, was to become the wife of a wealthy man and I suspect that it was with this goal in mind she was prepared to put all other considerations aside. I think we must admire her for being one very cool cookie. Not only did she go to identify the bodies, explaining that she wanted to "talk" to Sheila to ask her what had happened!!! but having performed the task, after smoking a cigarette, she requested a second viewing!!!
Like you, I'd have run a mile from any man who as much as hinted a violence. I can only imagine that this cool headed woman could envisage a carrot so large and juicy that it kept her not only at his side, but in his bed. I've said MANY times previously that had Jeremy not dumped her -the seriousness of their relationship possibly being only in HER head- he would probably STILL be a free man. I think she made good her statement that if she couldn't have him, no one else would.