The bedroom phone, phone calls & Neville.

[Jane]

april great post from Adam best yet

Yes, Susan. That one in particular spoke volumes

[susan]

Adam crashing in. Knocked the table over and goodness knows what else they did that was not documented sugar bowl spilled goodness gracious me I do declare.

[susan]

lookout don't think Gringo is that old certainly a poster who is well respected and very experienced and knows what he is talking about.

[Alias]

No, that's what you would do with the full benefit of hindsight!!

No, that's what I would do if it happened. I would simply not let anyone (never mind someone emotionally disturbed) alone with a loaded gun - not for a second. it's almost impossible to believe anyone would including yourself.

Apologies for being so direct, but would you leave someone alone with a gun with other loved ones in the house and go off to make phone calls at 3am?


Hi Caroline - just catching up.

I can’t find your reply to my question above.

Is it possible you could answer it?

Thanks.

Wasn´t it careless in the first place to leave weapons about with a mentally volatile person (well, two, if you count June) and two little boys?

[Adam]

I see you have neglected to answer the question(s) about lack of evidence on the rifle re: the struggle and beating of Nevill in the kitchen and with reference to the picture I posted - where is it broken?

Thought the butt of the gun was dented.

If Nevilles teeth, jaw, neck & eyes were not damaged by a blunt object, it must have been from bare hands. Or someone wearing gloves. More likely to be Jeremy. Uness the scenario suggested yesterday where Sheila shoots Neville three times & then spends the next few minutes beating him while dead.

[Adam]

Adam crashing in. Knocked the table over and goodness knows what else they did that was not documented sugar bowl spilled goodness gracious me I do declare.

Knocked a table & sugar bowl over ? Have not read that before.

The crime scene police & raid team were like 'Laurel & Hardy'.

[susan]

Adam did you not read tyler's post put up earlier I suggest you do you could learn so much from her.

[Jane]

Thought the butt of the gun was dented.

If Nevilles teeth, jaw, neck & eyes were not damaged by a blunt object, it must have been from bare hands. Or someone wearing gloves. More likely to be Jeremy. Uness the scenario suggested yesterday where Sheila shoots Neville three times & then spends the next few minutes beating him while dead.

It's just possible that the pathologist knew the difference between bullet wounds and blunt object trauma.

[lookout]

lookout don't think Gringo is that old certainly a poster who is well respected and very experienced and knows what he is talking about.

I should have said " long-standing " and not old,Susan,,but I know what I meant. Yes,,he is well respected and very knowing.

[gringo]

Who is this ?  I do not recognise this name in the 140 pages of this thread.

I have contributed on virtually all pages on this thread. Answering everyones questions, putting my views across & submitting new information.

I have read most of your ramblings on here and haven't contributed much to this thread so far because your level of debate is witless frankly . You answer barely any questions and this thread is littered with comments from various posters pointing this out so you clearly don't read the thread.
     As for not recognising me from  previous pages ; are you now the arbiter of who can comment and where on a public forum that you joined 15 days ago?
     You also have not submitted new information, you have just gone over old ground(there are other pages on this forum) and are clearly less informed than most posters on here.
     

[susan]

lookout I know what you meant but you know me can't resist a laugh.  Gringo knows what we are like

[susan]

Adam  keep reading you will find it I promise you it is impossible for you to absorb 28 years of information in 15 days

[Jane]

I have read most of your ramblings on here and haven't contributed much to this thread so far because your level of debate is witless frankly . You answer barely any questions and this thread is littered with comments from various posters pointing this out so you clearly don't read the thread.
     As for not recognising me from  previous pages ; are you now the arbiter of who can comment and where on a public forum that you joined 15 days ago?
     You also have not submitted new information, you have just gone over old ground(there are other pages on this forum) and are clearly less informed than most posters on here.
     

And over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over....................I guess you know where I'm coming from, don't you

[Adam]

If we believe that Nevill made two phone calls then we have to believe that it was Sheila that kicked off,and not June. Nevill told both Jeremy and the police that it was Sheila. Twins were never on the landing,they slept through it...thank god!

Although Jeremy told Mary Mugford that June is a religious maniac, he would never try to pin the crime on her. Sheila was much more likely.

Colin Caffell said Jeremy was very interested in Sheila's health situation soon before the night & asked when Sheila was next staying at the farm.

[Adam]

I love a bit of banter.

But let us all discuss the case rather than get personel.

 People do not like me questioning Jeremys innocence & suggesting things.  Everyone on here supports Jeremy. Except Steve.

My arguments are good & I know a lot about the case. My arguments are often supported with documentation.

I answer all questions I see. Rather than telling people to research it themselves.