The bedroom phone, phone calls & Neville.

[susan]

Adam you have caught me out I have not read this case up I am waiting for Mason Doyle's book because I think his research will have been so much more accurate than you or I and I am looking forward to reading facts instead of all your hearsay

[Adam]

He also said "Something is wrong at the farm".

Correct.

The judge could not believe Jeremy phoned Mugford. Especially before phoning the police.

[Jane]

It is up to the highly paid defence to get the answer they want from the pathologist. They didn't.

Which points to what has been said before. The defence wasn't as good as the prosecution, but that doesn't make the defendant guilty.

[grahameb]

Did they now ? Now that is bombshell evidence. Pity it wasn't used in court.

Its in their statements.

[Adam]

Adam you have caught me out I have not read this case up I am waiting for Mason Doyle's book because I think his research will have been so much more accurate than you or I and I am looking forward to reading facts instead of all your hearsay

Is he a good writer ?

[Adam]

Which points to what has been said before. The defence wasn't as good as the prosecution, but that doesn't make the defendant guilty.

That is Jeremys tough luck. He is lucky he could afford the best available at the time.

[Jan]

Have you not read up on the case ?

Silencer, Mugford, suspicious relatives, hacksaw, Jeremys indifference & spending sprees, inheritance money, only two possible suspects, no proof of phone call from Neville etc.

only two suspects? Did you know the family had had threats from other persons? And that there was a room locked from the inside that had access to a roof hatch. Sorry of course you would . And you would have seen the two phone call logs at 3.26 and 3.36  and read how it is possible the EP changed them to look at if they were merged. If they were the same log then they would have had no reason to keep them from the jury at the original trial would they? Also if they mistook B for a female why did they say male first? One male one female in the kitchen. And why does the police log say in conversation with someone in the house. Not trying to communicate with?  So many errors according to you. Its a shambles is it not.

[HMEssex]

Keep an open mind, Adam 

[Jane]

Correct.

The judge could not believe Jeremy phoned Mugford. Especially before phoning the police.

Refresh my memory, please. Did the judge say he didn't believe Jeremy had phoned Julie?

[susan]

Adam He is the best and most of his books are based on true life crime.  Go to his profile and read his introduction to the forum and if I was Jeremy I would be delighted that such an highly respected writer wanted to write a book about me and the murders at WHF.

[lookout]

BT freed up the phone line. All they could hear was a dog barking.

Or was it Sheila barking ?

It was the dog saying--------s a u s a g e s. 

[Jane]

That is Jeremys tough luck. He is lucky he could afford the best available at the time.

Yes. 28 years worth.

[Jan]

I have a question for anybody ( with a serious answer )  were the police able to surround the whole house so that they would definitely see if anyone else left the house during the time they were there?
I know they said the house was all locked up and all the windows - but as they made so many errors in their logs I was just wondering?

[grahameb]

Correct.

The judge could not believe Jeremy phoned Mugford. Especially before phoning the police.

Well either he did or he didn't. Make up your mind which.

[Jan]

Adam

you never answered my question about why the police waited for HOURS outside if there was absolutely no movement and no sound except for the dog ( in your view they were all dead) When they knew about two young children in the house . Remember this was before the days of H&S assesments. If that had been your family inside how would you have felt about that?