The bedroom phone, phone calls & Neville.

[lookout]

Who is saying it is a lie ? Jeremy ?

The pathologist,Adam. Silly billy.

[Adam]

There was no hacksaw and no marks on the window.

Yes there were. This was said at the court hearing. Jeremy did not deny this when on the witness stand.

Whether there was or not is neither here or there. Jeremys interview transcripts says he knew how to easily get into the house via windows. Or are the interview transcripts wrong ? Jeremy has never claimed they are.

[Adam]

So you're covering both angles there then? Make up your mind. Either he was wearing marigolds or he wasn't. But you are of course correct. He didn't have to wear gloves. Yet another silly suggestion scotched.

My page 20 scenario says he wore gloves. I never mentioned marigolds. Although thinking again he did not have to wear gloves. As mentioned yesterday.

The main criticism of my page 20 scenario was the wetsuit & gloves. Not much criticism of what happened in WHF.

[Adam]

Where did you read that? Oh! don't tell me. Don't tell me....Wilkes... Right?

Surely Wilkes is not making up what witnesses said in court ?

[susan]

Morning Adam

Jeremy volenteered the information that he accessed the house often by a window would he draw attention to this if he was Guilty I think not.  You told me the wrong price for RW's book they are selling at £30 to £80 the one you are reading is written by Claire Powell and lookout said it will be moth eaten and that is why it only costs one pence.

[Adam]

You don´t know that, you are guessing.

P.S. are you projecting your own dreams onto Jeremy?

I am indeed. I am sure he would have enjoyed the extra attention from the ladies at least.

[Adam]

Changing tack again are we? I thought he was up front directing the raid team according to your senario.

That is what I orignally said. Telling police Sheila is a 'nutter' & 'I don't get on with her at all'. Walking around the house & apparently seeing something inside.

But another poster told me Jeremy sat in the car most of the time in the background.

[lookout]

Yes there were. This was said at the court hearing. Jeremy did not deny this when on the witness stand.

Whether there was or not is neither here or there. Jeremys interview transcripts says he how to easily get into the house via windows. Or are the interview transcripts wrong ? Jeremy has never claimed they are.

Doesn't mean to say that they appeared just on the night of the murders though.Not forgetting that the hacksaw had been lying on the ground for a long time prior to being found.

[Adam]

A girl from an affluent area of Idaho shot dead her parents in 2003 because they disapproved of their daughters' lifestyle. Underage sex which is classed as statutory rape,drug-taking and disproval of a boyfriend. The daughter was 16 at the time of the shootings.Bloodied footprints and blood spatter got her convicted !

Latterly with Sheila,,she had some questionable " friends " which June and Neville were showing concern about,,and the company she was keeping in general.Blood underneath Sheilas' foot/feet,and spatter on the carpet.

Both the same patterns.

Has there ever been another WHF case. Where a woman has shot her parents, children & herself ?

Or just shot her children & parents & kept herself alive ?

[Adam]

Morning Adam

Jeremy volenteered the information that he accessed the house often by a window would he draw attention to this if he was Guilty I think not.  You told me the wrong price for RW's book they are selling at £30 to £80 the one you are reading is written by Claire Powell and lookout said it will be moth eaten and that is why it only costs one pence.

£30 for a 1994 book !

My book says Roger Wilkes on the cover.

Moth eaten ?

[Adam]

Yes it did. If she had no residue on her at all then she could not have been shot.

Ok to be specific minimal traces. Certainly no where enough to show she had been charging around in her nightie firing off 26 bullets & re loading twice.

[Adam]

He was mixed up with the police in the 80's and Campion can prove it. He was there at the "party" where the cops were "celebrating" the successful conviction of Jeremy Bamber. Kelvin Mackenzie was there as well.

So Kelvin Mckenzie is lying as well.

[lookout]

So Kelvin Mckenzie is lying as well.

Quite a dab-hand at lying. Look at Hillsborough !

[susan]

Adam I can only believe what posters of very high standing tell me who am I to doubt them. I will wait for Paul Harrisons book it will be new in every sense of the word

[Adam]

Adam I can only believe what posters of very high standing tell me who am I to doubt them. I will wait for Paul Harrisons book it will be new in every sense of the word

You can always read the mountain of evidence online.

Witness statements, interview transcripts, court appeal summaries (dozen of pages), articles ( dozens) wiki pedia, Youtube etc etc. I have. And did I mention have also read a book.

Going by one forum is narrow minded.