The bedroom phone, phone calls & Neville.

[susan]

Campion  I agree with every word you say so we shall share the reward 

[campion]

Hi Susan, Nice to see you- to see YOU nice! ( Courtesy of Bruce & Bruce labs).
'Ican say that I wood gladly share the Reward with Thou !!!!

[susan]

Hi campion I thank thee as you know we Yorkshire folk never refuse brass as how little the sum maybe. Could I have a little more than half

[Adam]

Bike and wetsuit were forensically tested Adam,and no evidence found. You will need to think of other ways how JB travelled to and from the farm that night. A flying carpet perhaps?

He could have walked/jogged.

But there is no special reason why there should be evidence on the bike or wet suit. All he would have done is sit on the bike & peddle.  Four of the five killings were quite straight forward so there may not have been much blood on him.  He could have cleaned himself at the house afterwards. Doesn't blood come off wet suits easily ?

[Adam]

Anyway I have an open mind, as previously said & will think of a Sheila scenario which matches the crime scene & bullet allocation.

[Jan]

He could have walked/jogged.

But there is no special reason why there should be evidence on the bike or wet suit. All he would have done is sit on the bike & peddle.  Four of the five killings were quite straight forward so there may not have been much blood on him.  He could have cleaned himself at the house afterwards. Doesn't blood come off wet suits easily ?

if you were a really clever person - which you are obviously saying JB is as he planned  this down to the last detail - dont you think he might have considered the possibility that if someone saw him jogging late at night in a wet suit and marigolds it might have been just a tincy wincy bit suspicious ?

[susan]

Hello Adam

evidence would have existed on the wheels of the bike not just the peddles and seat and as we know the bike was forensically tested.  Blood stains do not come off wet suits very easily almost impossible. Did he jog or walk in the wet suit and do you not think it would have been possible that he would have been noticed as looking quite out of place jogging in a wet suit in the early hours.

[grahameb]

He could have walked/jogged.

But there is no special reason why there should be evidence on the bike or wet suit. All he would have done is sit on the bike & peddle.  Four of the five killings were quite straight forward so there may not have been much blood on him.  He could have cleaned himself at the house afterwards. Doesn't blood come off wet suits easily ?

I don't think you have been paying attention to me Adam? Wetsuits are not drysuits. Drysuits are impervious to water. Wetsuits on the other hand are absorbent and the water needs to soak through to the skin. Because it is the actual water that keeps the diver or surfer warm. Therefore if Jeremy had worn a wetsuit any blood would have soaked through to his clothing underneath. So a wetsuit would have been the last thing he would have worn. If you are going to make up senarios then it is advisable to stick to the facts as much as possible.

[Adam]

if you were a really clever person - which you are obviously saying JB is as he planned  this down to the last detail - dont you think he might have considered the possibility that if someone saw him jogging late at night in a wet suit and marigolds it might have been just a tincy wincy bit suspicious ?

Who will see him jogging/walking/riding at that time of night ?

[grahameb]

Who will see him jogging/walking/riding at that time of night ?

Well its up to you if you want to believe the luny ideas of old man Boutflour.

[Jane]

Who will see him jogging/walking/riding at that time of night ?

I woner, are you playing devil's advocate or are you SO determined that Jeremy is guilty that you're offering scenarios as silly than SOME of ours.

[Alias]

It is ridiculous to think that Jeremy wore a wetsuit. I do realize that many pro Bambers come up with outlandish theories, but it goes the other way too! Jeez

[Caroline R]

He could have walked/jogged.

But there is no special reason why there should be evidence on the bike or wet suit. All he would have done is sit on the bike & peddle.  Four of the five killings were quite straight forward so there may not have been much blood on him.  He could have cleaned himself at the house afterwards. Doesn't blood come off wet suits easily ?

Magic carpet?

[Jan]

Who will see him jogging/walking/riding at that time of night ?

in country fields at night you can not guarantee that there may not be poachers/ or potentially lovers in cars etc. - that is if you are  suggesting he ran in the dark across the fields and not on roads or paths - so he could not have guaranteed that no-one would see him before he reached home.

[nugnug]

and why would he want to walk or cycle there seeing as he had a car.