Author Topic: Fraudulent???  (Read 18110 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #60 on: November 09, 2013, 09:12:PM »




Of course,Patti.

Well at least we got to know who J Stevenson was....Its remarkable that one little thing can lead to another....Have you read Websters report?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #61 on: November 09, 2013, 09:14:PM »
I'll be in the cupboard if anyone wants me!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Awww bless....Hope you have a flask and sandwich, oh and a candle lol  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #62 on: November 09, 2013, 09:19:PM »
Neither do I Alias....I don't even want to go there... :(
I have heard this before but surely it's just a coincidence?

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #63 on: November 09, 2013, 09:21:PM »
I have heard this before but surely it's just a coincidence?

I hope so Maggie.... :-\ :'(

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #64 on: November 09, 2013, 09:34:PM »
Well at least we got to know who J Stevenson was....Its remarkable that one little thing can lead to another....Have you read Websters report?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D




Is that the one about the DNA ?.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #65 on: November 09, 2013, 09:45:PM »
Mark Webster was in dispute with Hayward,wasn't he,,over that flake of blood having been tested ? Some jiggery-pokery there too.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #66 on: November 09, 2013, 10:33:PM »



Is that the one about the DNA ?.

Yes, Its about the flake found in the silencer....Webster confronts Hayward about the tests and his notes he made.   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline JackAll

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #67 on: November 11, 2013, 11:20:PM »
It is not a moderator....................a moderator runs the full lenghth of the barrel

Some people, mainly plod need to know the difference between a silencer and a moderator....

As far as my opinion stretches, the silencer was not involved in the incident and is primarily an item introduced into the evidence by persons who have distorted the incident.

Jack

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #68 on: November 12, 2013, 07:39:PM »
On their website, the company that made it refer to it as a sound moderator.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #69 on: November 17, 2013, 10:30:AM »
fascinating documents. Is the parentage of the twins covered anywhere else on here?

Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #70 on: November 17, 2013, 11:00:AM »
It is not a moderator....................a moderator runs the full lenghth of the barrel

Some people, mainly plod need to know the difference between a silencer and a moderator....

As far as my opinion stretches, the silencer was not involved in the incident and is primarily an item introduced into the evidence by persons who have distorted the incident.

Jack

The terms silencer, sound moderator and suppressor are in fact interchangeable.


Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #71 on: November 17, 2013, 11:04:AM »
The terms silencer, sound moderator and suppressor are in fact interchangeable.
Yes I thought I'd let you say it and not me. ;D As you are our resident lawyer and gun expert. I know narthing. I know narthing. ;D

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #72 on: November 17, 2013, 03:36:PM »
fascinating documents. Is the parentage of the twins covered anywhere else on here?

ignore this post - on reading that document again - to suggest that colin may not have been the twins father based on the blood groups was a pretty bad statement to make considering the rest of the document was quite well written.

Offline JackAll

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #73 on: November 17, 2013, 06:44:PM »
The terms silencer, sound moderator and suppressor are in fact interchangeable.

Wrong..........You should be RTU'd and do more research,



Sorry Pal.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2013, 06:56:PM by JackAll »

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #74 on: November 17, 2013, 07:15:PM »
Wrong..........You should be RTU'd and do more research,



Sorry Pal.

This pal is our chief administrator on this forum and very respected Jack.  I don't know what RTU'D means but please be mindful.