Author Topic: Fraudulent???  (Read 18119 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #30 on: November 09, 2013, 06:56:PM »
Caroline you are a star..... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #31 on: November 09, 2013, 07:06:PM »
I'm going for a cup of tea because all I got when I googled Manchester McKenzie was busty Alexi. ;D ;D.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #32 on: November 09, 2013, 07:32:PM »
I'm going for a cup of tea because all I got when I googled Manchester McKenzie was busty Alexi. ;D ;D.

Hahahahaha......

That report is fantastic....Mind you it opens up some more questions.  Why did the lab at Huntingdon find no blood in or out of the silencer????????? Yet a year later they do? How odd.

Caroline, could this report be put in the archives please......When you have time that is  ;) ;) ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #33 on: November 09, 2013, 07:34:PM »
Hahahahaha......

That report is fantastic....Mind you it opens up some more questions.  Why did the lab at Huntingdon find no blood in or out of the silencer????????? Yet a year later they do? How odd.

Caroline, could this report be put in the archives please......When you have time that is  ;) ;) ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D

Yes, no problem I'll post the rest first. :)

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #34 on: November 09, 2013, 07:35:PM »
Yes, no problem I'll post the rest first. :)

Thank you!!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #35 on: November 09, 2013, 07:43:PM »
.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #36 on: November 09, 2013, 07:44:PM »
.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #37 on: November 09, 2013, 07:45:PM »
.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #38 on: November 09, 2013, 07:48:PM »
And there's our Mr James Stevenson.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #39 on: November 09, 2013, 07:51:PM »
.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2013, 08:41:PM by Caroline »

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #40 on: November 09, 2013, 07:55:PM »
.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #41 on: November 09, 2013, 07:58:PM »
.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #42 on: November 09, 2013, 08:00:PM »
.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #43 on: November 09, 2013, 08:02:PM »
.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Fraudulent???
« Reply #44 on: November 09, 2013, 08:06:PM »
Hahahahaha......

That report is fantastic....Mind you it opens up some more questions.  Why did the lab at Huntingdon find no blood in or out of the silencer????????? Yet a year later they do? How odd.

Caroline, could this report be put in the archives please......When you have time that is  ;) ;) ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D
That is an amazing report and so very interesting....... how amazing, the comments on the discovery of the moderator speaks volumes.  How did they all get away with this and what was the judge up to OMG!