Truth of the night before

[HMEssex]

I have read extensively for two years.

What did you read? Why are you here, then?

[darcyanon]

Do you think it's realistic that there has been nothing found in over 28 years that indicates Sheila to have been responsible? That's a long time right?

Hello nobits. That's why I posed the question in case I was missing something obvious and the pictures on the forum don't do anything for me to show Sheila committed the crime.

[darcyanon]

What did you read? Why are you here, then?

Because I wanted to discuss the case? Isn't that what the forums for?

[No-Bits]

Hello nobits. That's why I posed the question in case I was missing something obvious and the pictures on the forum don't do anything for me to show Sheila committed the crime.

I think that's the problem for the more hardcore JB supporters, if it wasn't JB then it was Sheila. The evidence doesn't agree.

Instead they decide the evidence has been forged and choose to believe whatever they want.

[Caroline R]

Because I wanted to discuss the case? Isn't that what the forums for?

What have you read?

[darcyanon]

I think that's the problem for the more hardcore JB supporters, if it wasn't JB then it was Sheila. The evidence doesn't agree.

Instead they decide the evidence has been forged and choose to believe whatever they want.

Some of the paper trail is appalling! There are quite a few discrepancies.

[Caroline R]

I think that's the problem for the more hardcore JB supporters, if it wasn't JB then it was Sheila. The evidence doesn't agree.

Instead they decide the evidence has been forged and choose to believe whatever they want.

What evidence? Not the silencer? 

[darcyanon]

What have you read?

I started with blood relations, then the Jeremy bamber website. I have read the appeal verdict, the colp excerpts on here, all the statements on here, and read about 30 of the newest discussions. And the account by shaw. Quite a bit.

[No-Bits]

Some of the paper trail is appalling! There are quite a few discrepancies.

Yeah, the investigation wasn't the best and the police are a long way from covering themselves in glory. If the investigation was carried out thoroughly from the outset, including the standard procedure of the senior pathologist viewing the crime scene in situ, then this forum woudn't even exist.

Obviously that's just my opinion though.

[HMEssex]

Yes' ish, there aren't many left who are of the guilty persuasion,  not because they've changed there minds, it's just that there isn't much left to discuss and they've moved on.

But if you can bypass the animosity, then differing views have been voiced, which is a credit to the forum.

No doubt you will be happy to direct darcyanon to steve-uk's posts 

[Caroline R]

I started with blood relations, then the Jeremy bamber website. I have read the appeal verdict, the colp excerpts on here, all the statements on here, and read about 30 of the newest discussions. And the account by shaw. Quite a bit.

Then I'm not quite sure what you're asking? One of the main reason why many of us believe Sheila is responsible is that she was ill. She had had several psychotic episodes in the past and there is documented evidence to show that she was behaving oddly on the days before the 7th August.

[darcyanon]

Yeah, the investigation wasn't the best and the police are a long way from covering themselves in glory. If the investigation was carried out thoroughly from the outset, including the standard procedure of the senior pathologist viewing the crime scene in situ, then this forum woudn't even exist.

Obviously that's just my opinion though.

Do you think that's because they originally thought Sheila had done it? So they didnt think that what they were doing was important at first. Case closed if you know what I mean?

[No-Bits]

No doubt you will be happy to direct darcyanon to steve-uk's posts 

No HM, that's not fair. I think I would be right in saying even Caroline would agree with that? I have rarely if ever interacted with SteveUk.

You may not agree with my opinions, but I think I've earnt a little more respect than your post suggests.

[No-Bits]

Do you think that's because they originally thought Sheila had done it? So they didnt think that what they were doing was important at first. Case closed if you know what I mean?

For sure, but that's no excuse really. I think all on here agree the investigation was at least initially poor.

[darcyanon]

Then I'm not quite sure what you're asking? One of the main reason why many of us believe Sheila is responsible is that she was ill. She had had several psychotic episodes in the past and there is documented evidence to show that she was behaving oddly on the days before the 7th August.

You asked me what I'd read? I asked you if I'd missed anything obviously pointing to Sheila's guilt? I understand that she was ill and I agree that didnt bode well, but I can't see any evidence that she actually pulled the trigger.