Jeremy´s List

[Jane]

I second that!  + I am actually laughing a little bit.

Alias, I have something else which may make you smile. It has recently occurred to me that Steve's posts are more full of words than sense. He leaves us in no doubt that he believes Jeremy is guilty but from the length, intricacies and impossibly stupid and unworkable theories he presents, he has no fact based idea of WHY or HOW he committed the crime, he just knows Jeremy MUST be seen to be guilty, to which end he resorts to namecalling anyone who has any professional knowledge. Steve seems to base supposition on other peoples suppositions.

[Jane]

....................... Finally, why would blood be in the passenger seat of his car, if it came from him?? 

Caroline, may I suggest that Julie had one of "those" accidents?

[lookout]

According to Mr Hayward,,tests for blood groupings was insufficient. Carpet pieces ( yet there seemed to be enough blood on the carpets/rugs to obtain a grouping.) Wrist watch and strap,a very weak presence of blood.  All he seemed to ascertain was that the tests for blood,and the blood itself was of human origin. GREAT.! Marvellous deductions when there'd been a massacre.!

[lookout]

Blood was visible on Sheilas' right hand and arm. The bathrobe had blood on the right sleeve. Again no grouping was done on this and all we know is that it was human.!
There were no conclusive results of the front passenger seat of the car,,as it would have appeared that they'd been there for some time.


Apologies to Steve for not having come up with any forensic evidence involving Jeremy with the murders.
Perhaps you could do better Steve.? Blood,saliva,hair,etc etc.?

[lookout]

What is more,,my thoughts on the blood inside the baffles were that it was old animal blood.

[Jane]

Blood was visible on Sheilas' right hand and arm. The bathrobe had blood on the right sleeve. Again no grouping was done on this and all we know is that it was human.!
There were no conclusive results of the front passenger seat of the car,,as it would have appeared that they'd been there for some time.


Apologies to Steve for not having come up with any forensic evidence involving Jeremy with the murders.
Perhaps you could do better Steve.? Blood,saliva,hair,etc etc.?

Lookout, don't worry too much about not being able to produce any forensic evidence linking Steve to the murders. Steve will undoubtedly find some.

[lookout]

" Linking Steve with the murders "? I know who you mean,,you must be tired.

[Jane]

" Linking Steve with the murders "? I know who you mean,,you must be tired.

Now there's a Freudian slip for you and Yes, I'm tired, so I'll say goodnight before I make any more errors.

[lookout]

Now there's a Freudian slip for you and Yes, I'm tired, so I'll say goodnight before I make any more errors.

Aw,,goodnight April.

[tyler]

I thought blood was allegedly found on passenger seat of Neville's Citroen and not Jeremy's Astra?

[Caroline R]

"John Hayward,in evidence,said that when he examined some of Jeremy Bamber's clothing several weeks after the killings he had found spots of blood on the sleeve of one of his jackets and also on a bathrobe.Blood was also found on the passenger seat of Bamber's car. Although he'd carried out tests,Mr. Hayward said he was only able to establish that the blood on the clothing was human".
(Blood Relations Chapter 31)

I can't find that passage in Chapter 31 Steve. I think you have made a Freudian slip because Chapter 31 is mainly Julie Mugford's testimony!!

[Steve_uk]

I can't find that passage in Chapter 31 Steve. I think you have made a Freudian slip because Chapter 31 is mainly Julie Mugford's testimony!!

Yes sorry it's Chapter 32. It is ambiguous when it states "Bamber's car". I had assumed this to be Jeremy's but he may have been referring to Nevill's,but it's still unusual either way.

[Caroline R]

Yes sorry it's Chapter 32. It is ambiguous when it states "Bamber's car". I had assumed this to be Jeremy's but he may have been referring to Nevill's,but it's still unusual either way.

Why is it unusual??

[Steve_uk]

Why is it unusual??

Well it should be investigated when murders have occurred.

[Caroline R]

Well it should be investigated when murders have occurred.

It was investigated!! They were small spots and unless they linked him to the murders they weren't relevant. They didn't link him and so aren't relevant. They could have come from anywhere or anyone!!