Daniel and Nicholas Caffell: 22 June 1979-7 August 1985

[susan]

Maggie my love a Precis can't put the mark above the e.   I am so dim

[susan]

Maggie just realised we Yorkshire folk call that a wee summary (bit of Scottish in there)

[Jane]

Those little boys didn't have a very good start in life at all,bless them.

No lookout, they didn't, but have you noticed the similarity between their early life and Sheila's.

[maggie]

Maggie my love a Precis can't put the mark above the e.   I am so dim

Susie, my laptop did that 

[susan]

Maggie well I do declare you and your laptop are such a pair if you recall I had this laptop for 2 years before I knew where the apostrophe key was and tyler had to guide me to it

[lookout]

No lookout, they didn't, but have you noticed the similarity between their early life and Sheila's.

Yes,April,,it's no coincidence really that it follows on.

[maggie]

Maggie well I do declare you and your laptop are such a pair if you recall I had this laptop for 2 years before I knew where the apostrophe key was and tyler had to guide me to it

I do remember Susie.   You used to have your apostrophe's like commas. 

[susan]

Maggie you are right and the red thought it was so funny I did not know the difference between the two

[Caroline R]

There is just something so wrong about this whole thing!!

[lookout]

You have to ask yourself why Jeremy is still incarcerated.

[lookout]

You have to ask yourself why Jeremy is still incarcerated.

So if it looked like " a blob of jam ",,it probably was a blob of jam.!

[Patti]

I think the 2002 court of appeal accepted that the LCN DNA did not belong to Sheila, but a possible match for June and that of one other unidentified male.

Its the wording that makes me laugh because in the COA it read may not be Sheila's. What they don't actually say is that is isn't Sheila's DNA....One has to wonder what evidence one has to give in this case and whether the defence argued enough on this vital point in 2002...I suspect they did....but it didn't make an apeth of difference....However, they did say that they could not determine if the test was from blood or not. 

[maggie]

So if it looked like " a blob of jam ",,it probably was a blob of jam.!

More likely lookout because as we all know a blob of blood would not survive three days in a cupboard without dehydrating and it would look nothing like a blob of jam.  Also how can a blob of blood survive a car ride in a plastic bag only to be discovered with a hair also stuck on it when it arrives at the Eatons home?  I suppose there is a possibility there was a grey hair in the plastic bag which became attached to the blood when it was placed in the bag?

[Jane]

There is just something so wrong about this whole thing!!

Caroline, if this wasn't so terribly tragic and wrong, it MIGHT be funny.

[Caroline R]

More likely lookout because as we all know a blob of blood would not survive three days in a cupboard without dehydrating and it would look nothing like a blob of jam.  Also how can a blob of blood survive a car ride in a plastic bag only to be discovered with a hair also stuck on it when it arrives at the Eatons home?  I suppose there is a possibility there was a grey hair in the plastic bag which became attached to the blood when it was placed in the bag?

But would the blood be sticky after several days? I'd say not, it would dry and flake off.