Author Topic: Is this how it's going to work then?  (Read 16595 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #150 on: June 11, 2013, 10:34:PM »


Indeed it is excellent news,Maggie. 3.5 million pages of documents transferred into pdf with unseen material which Jeremy can't say for the time being,,but it looks as though it's going to prove the injustices of many.
It certainly looks hopeful lookout. Some stuff will be put on the official site but there"s much which can't be shown. Goodness knows how long the powers that be will take to pontificate on it. years and years probably we must hooe for the best. What a massive job they've done.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #151 on: June 11, 2013, 10:35:PM »
hello maggie, i will take a look thanks for the news.
Hi Mertol, hope you are well and happy. ;D

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #152 on: June 11, 2013, 10:40:PM »
im fine maggie if NN is around hi NN  i will be visiting some Nuns shortly.

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #153 on: June 13, 2013, 08:16:PM »
. . . I reckon was Neville phoning the police because Nevilles' call brought out a car which reached the farmhouse before the call that Jeremy made to them.
I've not read any evidence that a police car reached the farm before Jeremy called the police. Pc West's log indicated Jeremy's call occurred at 3:36am, whereas Malcolm Bonnett's log shows 03:35 as the time when the first police car was sent (not arrived). Note that "Neville" should be "Nevill".

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #154 on: June 13, 2013, 08:46:PM »
I've not read any evidence that a police car reached the farm before Jeremy called the police. Pc West's log indicated Jeremy's call occurred at 3:36am, whereas Malcolm Bonnett's log shows 03:35 as the time when the first police car was sent (not arrived). Note that "Neville" should be "Nevill".




It was when Jeremy was on hold after phoning the police that they eventually told him that a car was on its way after Nevill ( without an e ) had previously rang them.A patrol car had arrived at WHF minutes earlier than the one that Jeremy requested.
It's force of habit that I add an e to Nevill,because I have a cousin of the same name,,,with an e.


Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #155 on: June 14, 2013, 12:08:AM »
The first police car arrived over half an hour before the next (not just minutes) because it came from Witham, whereas the next came from Chelmsford (or near Chelmsford). It doesn't follow that the police received two calls. You need the information in the logs to draw that conclusion, and some oddities remain in regard to the early communications. For example, there doesn't seem to be any evidence from the person at Witham who was contacted prior to the car being sent from there.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #156 on: June 14, 2013, 02:34:AM »



It was when Jeremy was on hold after phoning the police that they eventually told him that a car was on its way after Nevill ( without an e ) had previously rang them.A patrol car had arrived at WHF minutes earlier than the one that Jeremy requested.
It's force of habit that I add an e to Nevill,because I have a cousin of the same name,,,with an e.

Lookout,
I'm unsure if you're making things up or if the information you're being given is just very, very wrong. I think it's important to be careful what you post when there is so much that shows it as false.

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #157 on: June 14, 2013, 03:10:AM »
Reader,IIRC NB's name is spelt with an "E" on his headstone? I will check when I have time just to make sure.

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #158 on: June 14, 2013, 05:25:AM »
The spelling "Nevill" is used in Jeremy's official blog and in the 2002 appeal judgement document.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #159 on: June 14, 2013, 09:54:AM »
Lookout,
I'm unsure if you're making things up or if the information you're being given is just very, very wrong. I think it's important to be careful what you post when there is so much that shows it as false.




Mat,,,I'll thank you not to tell me what to post. Be careful.? What.? False or not,,this is a forum which debates what is false or the truth depending on which side of the fence you're on. Surely this is what it's all about,,or haven't you noticed.?
I'm not in a habit of making things up either,,,what you might think is wrong,,doesn't give you the right to tell me,,or anyone else to be careful. If you think you can intimidate me,,think again.!

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #160 on: June 14, 2013, 10:08:AM »
Morning lookout

I know you to be one of the most honest posters on this forum and anything you post you believe is true. We all do this on the forum that is what the forum is about debating. ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #161 on: June 14, 2013, 10:16:AM »
Morning lookout

I know you to be one of the most honest posters on this forum and anything you post you believe is true. We all do this on the forum that is what the forum is about debating. ;D



Morning Susan,,it's just an excuse to take a pop at me again. Not to worry,,people like that are to be pitied really. :(
I wouldn't dream of posting anything out of line,,the same as I don't speak out of turn in " real life " either.
I have to thank you again,Susan for believing in me,you're a star. :-* :-* :-*

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #162 on: June 14, 2013, 10:16:AM »
The first police car arrived over half an hour before the next (not just minutes) because it came from Witham, whereas the next came from Chelmsford (or near Chelmsford). It doesn't follow that the police received two calls. You need the information in the logs to draw that conclusion, and some oddities remain in regard to the early communications. For example, there doesn't seem to be any evidence from the person at Witham who was contacted prior to the car being sent from there.
According to AA route planner from Witham it takes 26 minutes. From Chelmsford it takes 38 minutes.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #163 on: June 14, 2013, 10:22:AM »
The telephone call was put through to Chelmsford from Witham,hence the reason why Jeremy was put on hold,as Witham wasn't manned that night.
Jeremy was stated as having said " Christ,what took you so long ",as he waited for an answer.
Meanwhile,a car was already on its way to WHF.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Is this how it's going to work then?
« Reply #164 on: June 14, 2013, 10:29:AM »


Morning Susan,,it's just an excuse to take a pop at me again. Not to worry,,people like that are to be pitied really. :(
I wouldn't dream of posting anything out of line,,the same as I don't speak out of turn in " real life " either.
I have to thank you again,Susan for believing in me,you're a star. :-* :-* :-*

Good Morning Lookout

Is is possible that you can reply to the following please?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4383.msg180520.html#msg180520

I also specifically provided the following info for you which you have not acknowledged along with my pm.  If you no longer with to communicate with me perhaps you could let me know on the forum or via pm.  Thank you :)

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4372.msg180296.html#msg180296