Super hero, Batman, backs Bamber freedom bid...

[Caroline R]

If by trouble you mean speaking up when people post sick posts - then yeah I am guilty! And I have always spoken up when posts like that are made.

If you click on my profile, bring up the Show Posts I'm sure you'll find that's not quite true, April.

What were you telling Vic to lighten up at then? 

Isn't there a bridge you could go sit under? 

[guest154]

What for? Standing up against your posts? Caroline the difference between us is you spend all your time slagging down people that don't post on this forum. You attack people because of your interpretation on their statements.

Instead of slagging them down, when you know they don't post here and can't reply to what you post, it might be better to write to them.

[Caroline R]

What for? Standing up against your posts? Caroline the difference between us is you spend all your time slagging down people that don't post on this forum. You attack people because of your interpretation on their statements.

Instead of slagging them down, when you know they don't post here and can't reply to what you post, it might be better to write to them.

Yeah, yeah, yeah  I've had enough of you Mat - you're a stirrer and most people here know it!!

[Caroline R]

What for? Standing up against your posts? Caroline the difference between us is you spend all your time slagging down people that don't post on this forum. You attack people because of your interpretation on their statements.

Instead of slagging them down, when you know they don't post here and can't reply to what you post, it might be better to write to them.

My interpretation on whose statement?

[guest154]

What am I stirring? Was your post not out of order? (You say you didn't mean it, but can't say what you did mean)....and don't you slag JM and AE down, as well as others - do they post here?

You're more than happy to pull me up, call me names - but when I don't agree with your posts, you try and paint me with a bad brush.

This case isn't something to be joked about.

My interpretation on whose statement?

Julie? Ann?

[andrea]

Nevil, June, Sheila, daniel and Nicholas were all living, breathing, human beings with feelings, like all of us. Then they were blown away. Regardless of who you think is responsible dont you think they deserve some respect along with their family who still live with the aftermath?

mat and Vic are correct, it isnt right the things that are being posted.

[Caroline R]

What am I stirring? Was your post not out of order? (You say you didn't mean it, but can't say what you did mean)....and don't you slag JM and AE down, as well as others - do they post here?

You're more than happy to pull me up, call me names - but when I don't agree with your posts, you try and paint me with a bad brush.

This case isn't something to be joked about.

Julie? Ann?

I don't need to paint you with a bad brush - you do a good enough job on that yourself. Anyone reading the above will clearly see that you are taking what I said and arguing it for you own ends - you do it frequently with other people!! My comment of 'lighten up' was in reference to Vic's comments about Mike's Batman pictures and NOT about the case - but you already know that!!

However, as far as the statements go, of course they are going to be questioned!! Isn't that the whole point of the forum? Actually, you had plenty to say when I was 'discussing' the panic button with Vic who stated HERE that he was told by Ann and Peter that they thought Neville must have been trying to reach it. Turns out I was right!! The panic button was installed POST murders. That's why we debate the statements and if either Ann or Julie wish to join the forum - they'd be welcome!!

[guest154]

For me personally the Mike and Batman pictures were fine. If that's how Mike wants to spread the word that he believes Bamber is innocent, that's fine - he can do whatever he likes. If he wants to write it on his body and streak through London - that's fine. (Please don't though Mike!)

I draw the line at Batman and the broom, I draw the line at "lighten up" - those two things were my problem with this topic.

However, as far as the statements go, of course they are going to be questioned!! Isn't that the whole point of the forum? Actually, you had plenty to say when I was 'discussing' the panic button with Vic who stated HERE that he was told by Ann and Peter that they thought Neville must have been trying to reach it. Turns out I was right!! The panic button was installed POST murders. That's why we debate the statements and if either Ann or Julie wish to join the forum - they'd be welcome!!

I hope nothing ever happens like this to your family, and then your relatives are ripped apart on the internet. I think you'd view things differently.

[andrea]

How likely is it that Julie or the family would post here considering the way they have been spoken about?

[guest154]

I don't need to paint you with a bad brush - you do a good enough job on that yourself. Anyone reading the above will clearly see that you are taking what I said and arguing it for you own ends - you do it frequently with other people!! My comment of 'lighten up' was in reference to Vic's comments about Mike's Batman pictures and NOT about the case - but you already know that!!

Yes I do know that!
Vic had a problem that the Batman pictures were disrespectful to the dead, that they are an insult. In which you said 'Lighten up'.......Why should he (Or anyone else here who feels those pictures of batman insult the dead or make light of this crime) lighten up?

[Caroline R]

For me personally the Mike and Batman pictures were fine. If that's how Mike wants to spread the word that he believes Bamber is innocent, that's fine - he can do whatever he likes. If he wants to write it on his body and streak through London - that's fine. (Please don't though Mike!)

I draw the line at Batman and the broom, I draw the line at "lighten up" - those two things were my problem with this topic.



I hope nothing ever happens like this to your family, and then your relatives are ripped apart on the internet. I think you'd view things differently.

You have no idea what has happened in my family and if you feel that strongly, why are you even here? Why are you sullying yourself with a membership to a forum you are quite evidently totally against?

[guest154]

You have no idea what has happened in my family and if you feel that strongly, why are you even here? Why are you sullying yourself with a membership to a forum you are quite evidently totally against?

Because not everyone makes light of the situation on here. It is an interesting case. Mike has access to a lot that hasn't been shown. There are good members here on both sides that post things I find interesting.

[vidvic]

I'm offended by what I see as the trivialising of corruptive practices among police in this case.

This wins 'thought provoking post of the night' award and in my view goes to the real crux of why this case is even still talked about.

[Caroline R]

Yes I do know that!
Vic had a problem that the Batman pictures were disrespectful to the dead, that they are an insult. In which you said 'Lighten up'.......Why should he (Or anyone else here who feels those pictures of batman insult the dead or make light of this crime) lighten up?

No, that's not why I said it and you know that! If Vic has a problem, let him say so - I took down the pictures that he complained about and if you had bothered to read his post properly he went on to say "I do not object to the puerile, childish, nonsense, that is the rest of the thread" it was to that statement that I said Lighten up!!

[vidvic]

No, that's not why I said it and you know that! If Vic has a problem, let him say so - I took down the pictures that he complained about and if you had bothered to read his post properly he went on to say "I do not object to the puerile, childish, nonsense, that is the rest of the thread" it was to that statement that I said Lighten up!!

I feel like I'm being argued over and I'm still in the room!