Real reason Mugford took a month to come forward with her story....

[Caroline R]

This isn't true at all. Julie asked Jeremy about his involvement that first night at Goldhanger after the Police had gone and this is when he told her "No..I couldn't have done it..Matthew done it".

 

Why did she ask him? Hadn't he already discussed plans for a whole year, eventually deciding on a hitman and even telling her the night previously that 'it's tonight or never'? Strangely though, she also mentioned to Colin which window JB allegedly left by. She just doesn't have a definitive 'story'

[Steve_uk]

The Jeremy supporters have to tread carefully as they are well aware with Julie,because it's incompatible with Jeremy's innocence if he told her too much. It was all in his head so Julie thought and she just didn't take him seriously,which one can understand. I'm trying to grasp this new angle of the trick of the light story but so far the light is dimming on this thread as far as I'm concerned.

[mike tesko]

Mugford couldn't come forward with her story about Jeremy planning to kill his family, because she overheard him telling Clarke and Jones that two police officers and Jeremy had seen someone moving around in the bedroom, at a time when Jeremy was outside in the grounds, so he could hardly have killed everyone before phoning police - not only that but Jeremy told her that he thought police had shot Sheila when they stormed the building, and that he had complained to a police officer at the scene about the prospect of this having happened...

[Caroline R]

The Jeremy supporters have to tread carefully as they are well aware with Julie,because it's incompatible with Jeremy's innocence if he told her too much. It was all in his head so Julie thought and she just didn't take him seriously,which one can understand. I'm trying to grasp this new angle of the trick of the light story but so far the light is dimming on this thread as far as I'm concerned.

Why do we have to tread carefully? That doesn't make any sense.

[Steve_uk]

As far as I was aware Jeremy made a throwaway remark about the raid team shooting his family when he was either sitting in the back of a Police car or walking away from the farm with Dr. Craig. He couldn't possibly have known the actions of the Raid Team that morning. As for Sheila,are we now led to believe that she shot four people after Nevill's purported call to Jeremy at 3:26am and was still walking round inside with everyone else dead by the time of the Police arrival at 3:48am? She suddenly comes out of psychosis and decides to shoot herself,when there's a likelihood that a real schizophrenic would have come out to meet Police cradling her dead sons in her arms.

I don't understand how Julie can know more than Jeremy about the murders if he is completely innocent. Why would Julie stick to the story which made her look bad of Jeremy plotting the murders for a year? The Jeremy supporters are walking a tightrope in making Julie culpable because it's impossible she knew about the plan beforehand without the knowledge coming from Jeremy first.

[Roch]

This isn't true at all. Julie asked Jeremy about his involvement that first night at Goldhanger after the Police had gone and this is when he told her "No..I couldn't have done it..Matthew done it".

You cant be serious? You actually believe that?

[Caroline R]

As far as I was aware Jeremy made a throwaway remark about the raid team shooting his family when he was either sitting in the back of a Police car or walking away from the farm with Dr. Craig. He couldn't possibly have known the actions of the Raid Team that morning. As for Sheila,are we now led to believe that she shot four people after Nevill's purported call to Jeremy at 3:26am and was still walking round inside with everyone else dead by the time of the Police arrival at 3:48am? She suddenly comes out of psychosis and decides to shoot herself,when there's a likelihood that a real schizophrenic would have come out to meet Police cradling her dead sons in her arms.

I don't understand how Julie can know more than Jeremy about the murders if he is completely innocent. Why would Julie stick to the story which made her look bad of Jeremy plotting the murders for a year? The Jeremy supporters are walking a tightrope in making Julie culpable because it's impossible she knew about the plan beforehand without the knowledge coming from Jeremy first.

This has been answered so many times that I can't quite believe you're asking it again.

[maggie]

This has been answered so many times that I can't quite believe you're asking it again.

I know how you feel Caroline, I felt the same about the window.  Harder to believe was the fact that I was answering it yet again....

[Steve_uk]

This has been answered so many times that I can't quite believe you're asking it again.

Well people will keep posting these old canard threads,won't they?

[Caroline R]

Well people will keep posting these old canard threads,won't they?

It only made her look bad at the end of the trial when it was published in the NOTW however, she had £25,000.00 to help her get over it! I don't understand the rest of your point because obviously JB supporters don't think he's guilty so obviously she didn't know about the 'plan' beforehand - simply because there was no plan!!

[lookout]

Well people will keep posting these old canard threads,won't they?

Steve,,you're priceless. 

[mertol22]

  Good Afternoon Mike,
  Please count me in for this. I wonder how it will equate with the apparent fiction from Steve uk ?

Steve has been quiet recently, we must brace ourselves for further book quotes .

[mertol22]

Why do we have to tread carefully? That doesn't make any sense.

perhaps steve has scattered drawing pins everywhere so watch out in yer bare feet

[mertol22]

Mugford being female in gender goes a long way into the police buying her story , which just what is was .

[Caroline R]

perhaps steve has scattered drawing pins everywhere so watch out in yer bare feet

Ha, ha! I'll watch my step then :D