Author Topic: JUSTICE FOR ALL - read the truth about the silencer / blood Evidence  (Read 7811 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: JUSTICE FOR ALL - read the truth about the silencer / blood Evidence
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2011, 06:44:PM »
So much  confusion over the blood in the silencer, even amongst the experts, that the jury simply had little chance of understanding it

Prosecutions blood Expert, John Hayward, misled the defense expert, Professor Lincoln, into believing that the small flake which was found inside the baffle plates, was made into one solution, which in turn was separated into five separate lots, and each lot tested for a specific blood group activity? Possible errors could have been made adopting this process...

Later, it turns out that Hayward, broke small flake up into five separate pieces, and made each into a solution, which was tested for individual blood groupings. This too was subject to possible errors in the typing process adopted...

Worse still...

It turns out that before Blood Expert could accept a result obtained during the testing of these solutions, that two independent results had to be obtained from the examination of the solution, before FSS could accept a particular result - yet, this was only achieved in one (EAP BA)  of the tests, for four of the obtained blood group results...

Three of the blood group tests (HP2-1, AK1-1, and A), could not be, and were not confirmed by second tests, yet the blood expert included them in the collection of blood group results, (A EAP BA, AK1 and HP 2-1), which enabled him to claim that four confirmed blood groups had been found to be present inside the silencer (Flake) when as it turns out, there were only one confirmed result ( EAP BA - where a second result was obtained through testing the same solution on a second occasion)...

What becomes apparent from all of this, is that the blood results obtained from the examination of the flakes solution, was not unique or exclusive to Sheila Caffell, as alleged by the prosecution, and its experts, at the time of Jeremy Bambers trial...

The solitary blood group, (EAP BA) which were successfully double tested, could have originated from Ralph, and or June Bamber, or both...

« Last Edit: February 28, 2011, 08:22:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: JUSTICE FOR ALL - read the truth about the silencer / blood Evidence
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2011, 08:35:PM »
Point in trial when it all started to go wrong:-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: JUSTICE FOR ALL - read the truth about the silencer / blood Evidence
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2011, 08:42:PM »
Evidence must not be adduced after the close of the case (once the trial judge has concluded his summing up of the case)...

Please go to following link:-

(1) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ChgE_5rTODIC&pg=PA289&lpg=PA289&dq=no+additional+evidence+may+be+given+to+jury+after+it+retires+to+deliberate+its+verdict&source=bl&ots=p80l8L5pGp&sig=2K3u73fu90-fn9BczHEZ5i-fzus&hl=en&ei=KgdsTd_gH
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: JUSTICE FOR ALL - read the truth about the silencer / blood Evidence
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2011, 08:46:PM »
Once the jury posed the question about the blood, the trial judge took it upon himself to mislead the jury into believing, or accepting, that all the blood found ij the silencer, was unique and exclusive to Sheila, but it was not, and the blood expert, John Hayward did not testify to that effect during his testimony...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...