Author Topic: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-  (Read 4371 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« on: March 23, 2013, 09:17:PM »
Here:-
« Last Edit: March 23, 2013, 09:22:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2013, 11:34:PM »
Interesting that he states the rifle was 'not particularly well oiled' which could explain the lack of gun oil on Sheila's nightdress!!

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2013, 02:06:AM »
Anthony Pargeter:-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2013, 07:35:AM »
Morning Mike,
In the Arlidge examination of Pargeter, on page5, at C
Question: "Did you meet anybody as you went............
       Pargeter answers: ".......Jeremy took the Anschutz with him. I went to the back of the barn to zero 'IT' in.

To obviate ambiguity and obfuscation, can you confirm that by 'IT', Pargeter must actually be referring to his own Bruno Bolt Action .22 Rifle?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2013, 09:12:AM »
Morning Mike,
In the Arlidge examination of Pargeter, on page5, at C
Question: "Did you meet anybody as you went............
       Pargeter answers: ".......Jeremy took the Anschutz with him. I went to the back of the barn to zero 'IT' in.

To obviate ambiguity and obfuscation, can you confirm that by 'IT', Pargeter must actually be referring to his own Bruno Bolt Action .22 Rifle?

Hi campion,

Yes, Pargeter was referring to zeroing in his .22 Bruno bolt action rifle, having recently purchased a brand new telescopic site for it...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2013, 11:40:AM »
A couple of things I picked up on was that AP said that ammunition was kept in the cupboard left of the AGA.

He also recollects being behind the barn with Jeremy in 1984?????? and that he used the gun sights and not a telescope...

Mike is there any documented evidence that Sheila did attend a shoot?  I know it has been said that CC says he attended a shoot with Sheila as beaters.,.... ;D ;D ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2013, 06:52:PM »
Interesting that he states the rifle was 'not particularly well oiled' which could explain the lack of gun oil on Sheila's nightdress!!




That's something worth noting too.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2013, 09:56:PM »
Not worth noting really, since he is talking about when he saw it and not the night or the murders.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2013, 12:46:PM »
Nice to see you, Matt.     Hop you are well and Snugsnug under the rug, or should I say Carpet?

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2013, 01:08:PM »
Not worth noting really, since he is talking about when he saw it and not the night or the murders.
The same logic must then therefore apply regarding AP stating that the sound moderator and sights were attached when he saw the rifle?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2013, 02:25:PM »
The same logic must then therefore apply regarding AP stating that the sound moderator and sights were attached when he saw the rifle?

Yup.

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2014, 11:16:PM »
In fact this may be clearer.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2014, 09:30:AM »



That's something worth noting too.





I seem to remember having mentioned this not so long ago. That after so many shots,the rifle would have to be cleared of " soot " ( debris ),then oiled.Due to this procedure not having been done,there'd have been no oil to protect the workings of the inside of the rifle,leaving it in a " dried-out " state thus not producing the said residue that was missing from Sheilas' nightdress.
The manner in which the rifle was fired WOULD leave it hot ( overheated ) enough to burn flesh,and would have shown a discolouration on the metal too,not to mention the damage to the overall efficiency when firing.

My theory is that Sheila could possibly have attempted to clean the inside using the tampax ( which she was using herself at the time ) I honestly couldn't imagine Jeremy cleaning it out that way on account of fibres getting into the workings ! There would have been a proper " tool " for pulling through,of which there was no sign of.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2014, 10:22:AM »




I seem to remember having mentioned this not so long ago. That after so many shots,the rifle would have to be cleared of " soot " ( debris ),then oiled.Due to this procedure not having been done,there'd have been no oil to protect the workings of the inside of the rifle,leaving it in a " dried-out " state thus not producing the said residue that was missing from Sheilas' nightdress.
The manner in which the rifle was fired WOULD leave it hot ( overheated ) enough to burn flesh,and would have shown a discolouration on the metal too,not to mention the damage to the overall efficiency when firing.

My theory is that Sheila could possibly have attempted to clean the inside using the tampax ( which she was using herself at the time ) I honestly couldn't imagine Jeremy cleaning it out that way on account of fibres getting into the workings ! There would have been a proper " tool " for pulling through,of which there was no sign of.

So in a fit of psychosis, she stops to clean the rifle?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Sworn trial testimony of Anthony Pargeter:-
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2014, 10:29:AM »
So in a fit of psychosis, she stops to clean the rifle?





No-------------she attempts. Two different phrases. The " plugs " were already there,available.