How would you greet Julie Mugford on her return visit to England?

[Jane]

She shielded him by not making reference to his desire to want to kill his family.http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1932

Just thinking out loud here but I wonder if it's possible that she didn't go the whole hog because she was partly warning Jeremy what it was possible for her to do and partly hoping that there was still a chance for them to be together. I remain unconvinced that she'd have said anything if he'd put a (HUGE) ring on her finger...........................which isn't to say the relationship would have lasted.

[lookout]

 It's funnier still that she didn't get herself pregnant,which would have been one way of securing her future.

[Jane]

It's funnier still that she didn't get herself pregnant,which would have been one way of securing her future.

Best to keep all options open, perhaps.

[Alias]

Julie was studying for a future career. That must have meant that she was prepared to support herself financially - even though a teacher´s job is not the most lucrative, you can easily live a decent life on the wages.

[Mr. Gee]

She didn't (and couldn't) but she backed up the notion of the call from Nevill and that was Jeremy's alibi.

Steve used the word "cover-up". How could supporting his father's telephone call do that? Hardly a Maxine Carr type crime.

[Steve_uk]

Steve used the word "cover-up". How could supporting his father's telephone call do that? Hardly a Maxine Carr type crime.

Did she support Jeremy's story of a telephone call from Nevill? How could she when she was in Lewisham and not Bourtree Cottage?

[lookout]

Maybe she had no choice,Steve,if she too was in it up to her neck. After all,it was she who answered Jeremys call in the early hours-----------nobody else. Was she expecting it ?

[Jane]

Maybe she had no choice,Steve,if she too was in it up to her neck. After all,it was she who answered Jeremys call in the early hours-----------nobody else. Was she expecting it ?

No she didn't. A housemate answered it.

[lookout]

No she didn't. A housemate answered it.

That would have made the situation less suspicious then. At least Julie had an alibi.

[Steve_uk]

But as DS Jones asked in interrogation on 11 September 1985: "Why telephone Julie at all?" There's really no satisfactory answer..

[Adam]

But as DS Jones asked in interrogation on 11 September 1985: "Why telephone Julie at all?" There's really no satisfactory answer..

'No comment'. Said Jeremy. When interviewed.

When testifying he said he 'wanted to hear a friendly voice'.

Not sure how friendly Julie would be at 3am.

[lookout]

 Steve,if there'd been any rapport with the relatives,then he would obviously have rang one of them,which,if I didn't know differently,would have said that JM would have been expectant of the call ?

[Alias]

Nothing strange in him calling Julie. In fact, the only natural thing to do. This was an extreme situation, wouldt you agree? You´d need someone close to come and be with you!

[Steve_uk]

Nothing strange in him calling Julie. In fact, the only natural thing to do. This was an extreme situation, wouldt you agree? You´d need someone close to come and be with you!

Yes ok,but "all is going well..there's something wrong at the Farm". I suppose this is just more of Julie's lies..

[Adam]

If he wanted to hear a friendly voice, what did he say to Julie ?

'Hi, dad's just phoned. He said ' Come quickly, Sheila has gone crazy and she's got the gun'. I am worried and want to hear a friendly voice, which is why I am phoning you.