How would you greet Julie Mugford on her return visit to England?

[Alias]

I wonder if it is on the forum?

As far as I recall I read it on the forum.

[Caroline]

As far as I recall I read it on the forum.

I'll have a good look over the weekend and see if I can find it - it sounds intriguing!!

[Alias]

I'll have a good look over the weekend and see if I can find it - it sounds intriguing!!

Others might remember seeing that letter - and Mike certainly.

[Jane]

Others might remembering seeing that letter - and Mike certainly.

Alias, I feel certain that he asked her why she was lying although I don't recall feeling that there was anything vindictive about the letter. Perhaps I dreamed it.

[Caroline]

Others might remembering seeing that letter - and Mike certainly.

Yes, it does ring a bell, I think I also read it but it was a while ago.

[Steve_uk]

Others might remembering seeing that letter - and Mike certainly.

From memory there was a quite innocuous letter quoted in Clare Powell's book to Julie from Stinko. I also believe there was a second letter which was threatening in nature,which not even Clare got her hands on.

[Alias]

Ohhh, I hate seeing that quoted so many times - remembering seeing....  Oh well, it is a sign of intelligence if you think ahead while writing  - BUT sloppyness for not proof reading....v

April, I don´t remember the letter being vindictive either. The tone was quite soft. Maybe to make her do or say something - I don´t know. Would be interesting to re-read it.

[Adam]

From memory there was a quite innocuous letter quoted in Clare Powell's book to Julie from Stinko. I also believe there was a second letter which was threatening in nature,which not even Clare got her hands on.

At trial.

The jury also heard about a note Jeremy tried to send Julie after she had approached the police -

'Hi darling. Hope this gets to you from Stalag 13. Thinking about you. Sorry we're splitting up. I love you. Stinker.

[Adam]

Correction. This note was sent the day after Julie denounced him.

[Jan]

If it is from him its the first time I have seen his hand writing - not in capitals

[lookout]

 Yes,that's Jeremys' writing.

[Alias]

Jan, good job! That must be it - I just don´t remember it in detail - at all. He does mention that he is convicted of something he didn´t do.
What gave me the uneasy feeling must be the lack of anger - I don´t understand that if she lied about him on the witness stand.

[lookout]

 How very sad.

[Steve_uk]

Jan, good job! That must be it - I just don´t remember it in detail - at all. He does mention that he is convicted of something he didn´t do.
What gave me the uneasy feeling must be the lack of anger - I don´t understand that if she lied about him on the witness stand.

But the second letter is more guarded. It's interesting though to read normal handwriting as he must have written at Gresham's. The first letter is more incriminating as it doesn't profess innocence but does stress that his fate is in her hands. I wonder if he knew about the silencer evidence at this stage?

[Jan]

But the second letter is more guarded. It's interesting though to read normal handwriting as he must have written at Gresham's. The first letter is more incriminating as it doesn't profess innocence but does stress that his fate is in her hands. I wonder if he knew about the silencer evidence at this stage?

Is the other letter on here as well?