The Secrets that we share (Bamber and Mike Teskowski)...

[mike tesko]

How many more variations on a theme will you come up with Mike? Only a year ago, you were claiming that no silencer was handed in by the relatives until September. Any chance of you having a theory and sticking to it? Any chance of you answering the direct question on another thread regarding the photo on the bed? Shouldn't this thread read 'secrets which we used to share' before bamber wanted nothing more to do with you?

You idiot...

[big-goolies]

How many more variations on a theme will you come up with Mike? Only a year ago, you were claiming that no silencer was handed in by the relatives until September. Any chance of you having a theory and sticking to it? Any chance of you answering the direct question on another thread regarding the photo on the bed? Shouldn't this thread read 'secrets which we used to share' before bamber wanted nothing more to do with you?

 
scrapeing the bottom of the barrel springs to mind here

[mike tesko]

How many more variations on a theme will you come up with Mike? Only a year ago, you were claiming that no silencer was handed in by the relatives until September. Any chance of you having a theory and sticking to it?

Which silencer are you on about, the one Boutflour found marked DRB/1, or one of the others SBJ/1, or DB/1? Don't bother trying to tell me that all these silencers were one and the same, such a pathetic explanation holds no water with me, these were all different silencers, not the same one. The silencer Boutflour found did not get sent to the lab' until 29th April 1986, as confirmed by details relating to its movement whilst DRB/1 was in police possession. It seems the Boutflour silencer (DRB/1) was not the silencer blood and paint  was found upon - I notice you are not trying to rubbish that startling discovery....

Anyway, I don't need your permission or consent to change my mind about anything, I can make those kinds of decisions all by myself...

And for your information, I have never submitted any grounds on Jeremys behalf to the CCRC, and I had nothing to do with the civil case grounds published on the forum elsewhere. Stop talking rubbish...

[vidvic]

Lol.....mike, that's one thing I could never criticise you for, changing your mind....

Your ability to 'have a word with yourself' is pretty good too!

[mike tesko]

Lol.....mike, that's one thing I could never criticise you for, changing your mind....

Your ability to 'have a word with yourself' is pretty good too!

it is healthy to be able to change your mind about something, when new information and evidence comes to light, and in any event I set this forum up so that people could debate features of the case, therefore, you really should not try to read too much into why I appear to be changing my mind about things of interest to the investigation of the case. I am glad you have drawn attention to this trait of mine, imagine what the verdict might have been if the jury had been given access to all the withheld material?

Thanks for all your help getting this concept across to everybody...

Finally, its comforting to know that when I am talking to myself on the forum that at least you are paying attention...

[susan]

Hi Mike  I agree it is healthy to look at aspects from a different angle this is how we all learn and find out new facts having tunnel vision (maybe wrong word for me to use)  is not healthy.
I am paying attention

[maggie]

Hi Mike  I agree it is healthy to look at aspects from a different angle this is how we all learn and find out new facts having tunnel vision (maybe wrong word for me to use)  is not healthy.
I am paying attention

And me Mike
Well said Susie, a fixed, unquestioning mind never learns anything, I should imagine

[mike tesko]

I will be posting new information from 2003, later this evening upon my return home - I am currently in a taxi heading north up the M1 motorway, A57 Worksop, Sheffield south, junction...