Evidence clearly exists to show that the sound moderator is dodgy and should never been admissible evidence at the trial of Jeremy Bamber - it is without doubt and arguably the most significant piece of evidence in the case which supports the prosecutions stance, and its integrity is called into question, by reference to all the inconsistencies and irregularities surounding the three different exhibit references given to it (SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1), attributed to it, at one time or another. In addition, it started off life as Lab's exhibit reference number 22, was changed into lab' exhibit reference number 23, and finally, was altered back from lab' item reference number 23 to 22...
Deeply involved in this exercise, was / is Police Inspector Miller, who produced a handw ritten schedule in which he instructs all the witnesses to make alterations in their witness statements, to chjange the silencer references, from one to the other, and vice versa (SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1) - it is a fact that no-one should be tampering with the exhibit labels and references of evidence that is to be relied upon in court proceedings. Fact is, the jury were not told or made aware that the silencers integrity was called into question by the aklteration of lab' documents and witness statements where the exhibit lable for the sound moderator was altered so many times, in one case the forensic scientist who examined the silencer (SBJ/1) on 13th August 1985, did not even know that someone eklse had altered the exhibit reference for the silencer she examined on that occasion, into DRB/1, without her knowlege or consent...
How much more dodgy, can the silencer evidence get, or be?
The silencer evidence has to be withdrawn, it is no longer tenable evidence, it is unreliable, it is dodgy and it has been tampered with, by anybody's standards. Questions have been raised about how this silencer evidence came into the fray, who sought to introduce it, why it was introduced. and who went along with its introduction...
Perhaps, once everyone sees the content of the civil action application to the High Court everyone will be left in no doubt, as to those / these reasons...
