Author Topic: She's got the gun  (Read 29788 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #285 on: February 09, 2013, 03:08:PM »
With respect, that's hardly the point. JB gave an account of the supposed phone call, and that account limited the suspect list to two.


Because there was nobody else alive to verify what was said. Imagine being in that situation yourself.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #286 on: February 09, 2013, 03:13:PM »

Because there was nobody else alive to verify what was said. Imagine being in that situation yourself.

With or without verification, the phone call limits it to two suspects. The only difference verification would make is that it would indicate that the other one was the killer.
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #287 on: February 09, 2013, 03:15:PM »
With or without verification, the phone call limits it to two suspects. The only difference verification would make is that it would indicate that the other one was the killer.


Not necessarily.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #288 on: February 09, 2013, 03:26:PM »

Not necessarily.

Well I've asked you twice already for an alternative interpretation, I think it's safe to say you don't have one.
....just cos I eat worms...

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #289 on: February 09, 2013, 03:40:PM »
With or without verification, the phone call limits it to two suspects. The only difference verification would make is that it would indicate that the other one was the killer.

Well, (and I don't believe that there was one) but it might indicate a third party.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #290 on: February 09, 2013, 03:42:PM »
Well, (and I don't believe that there was one) but it might indicate a third party.

I don't see how..
....just cos I eat worms...

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #291 on: February 09, 2013, 05:08:PM »
I don't see how..

A third party pretending to be Neville to lure JB to the farm but as I said, I don't believe the third party scenario.

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #292 on: February 09, 2013, 05:21:PM »
I don't see how..
Even the antis hint at a third party working with Jeremy. It was suggested by Julie Mugford as well.

Offline big-goolies

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 619
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #293 on: February 09, 2013, 05:26:PM »
Even the antis hint at a third party working with Jeremy. It was suggested by Julie Mugford as well.

 
Muggy mentioned it ? she claimed JB told he had hired a hitman

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #294 on: February 09, 2013, 06:01:PM »

 
Muggy mentioned it ? she claimed JB told he had hired a hitman
Still a third party BG. ;)

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #295 on: February 09, 2013, 06:17:PM »
A third party pretending to be Neville to lure JB to the farm but as I said, I don't believe the third party scenario.

I think JB would know his own father's voice (I realise that you don't subscribe to this theory yourself).
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #296 on: February 09, 2013, 06:18:PM »
Even the antis hint at a third party working with Jeremy. It was suggested by Julie Mugford as well.

JM's evidence was as to what JB had told her, not what had actually happened.
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #297 on: February 09, 2013, 07:02:PM »
JM's evidence was as to what JB had told her, not what had actually happened.

Hi Bridget :)  Could not the same apply to anything that Jeremy had told? Or have I missed the point?  :P :) :) :) :)

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #298 on: February 09, 2013, 07:06:PM »
Hi Bridget :)  Could not the same apply to anything that Jeremy had told? Or have I missed the point?  :P :) :) :) :)

Sorry Patti, not sure what you mean.
....just cos I eat worms...

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #299 on: February 09, 2013, 07:20:PM »
I think JB would know his own father's voice (I realise that you don't subscribe to this theory yourself).

There are those that believe that he might have been forced to make the call (not me though  ;D ;D)