Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 896029 times)

1 Member and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6630 on: June 20, 2026, 08:39:PM »
Kate's narrative is she left Madeleine holding Cuddle Cat. It puts the little girl alive at 6:00pm, and places her in bed. The mystery is how the toy got to the ledge, with no DNA present. You may well be right in your scenario; we just don't know.

What ledge?  Where are you getting this info from?  If the abductor lifted a sleeping MM out of bed then the abdudctor would not necessarily come into contact with CC.  I thought the soc images showed CC lying mid way on MM's pillow?  Children move around in their sleep any any toy companions could end up anywhere. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

England World Cup Anthem For 2026:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJde7pCpro4&list=RDLJde7pCpro4&start_radio=1

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5982
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6631 on: June 20, 2026, 08:50:PM »
What ledge?  Where are you getting this info from?  If the abductor lifted a sleeping MM out of bed then the abdudctor would not necessarily come into contact with CC.  I thought the soc images showed CC lying mid way on MM's pillow?  Children move around in their sleep any any toy companions could end up anywhere.
Watch the video Steve posted in reply 6622, Cutie!

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21167
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6632 on: June 20, 2026, 08:52:PM »
What ledge?  Where are you getting this info from? If the abductor lifted a sleeping MM out of bed then the abdudctor would not necessarily come into contact with CC.  I thought the soc images showed CC lying mid way on MM's pillow?  Children move around in their sleep any any toy companions could end up anywhere.
From the 2:30 point: https://youtu.be/Q6hkx1eujLI

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6633 on: Yesterday at 03:19 PM »
From the 2:30 point: https://youtu.be/Q6hkx1eujLI

But who is the narrator?  What makes his narration reliable?  What ledge?  The soc image shows CC around the pillow.  MM wasn't a baby.  She was nearly 4 yoa and quite capable of reaching out for CC around the pillow.

You listen to a lot of drivel. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

England World Cup Anthem For 2026:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJde7pCpro4&list=RDLJde7pCpro4&start_radio=1

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6634 on: Yesterday at 03:30 PM »
Steve what have you got to say about https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cwy2qp32d1pt ?  And another man who professed to be a Christian.  No doubt you will say there's always one bad apple  ::)  More like the whole crate! 

What has this got to do with MM?  Everything.  It shows how people like the Tranmers would simply fly by the radar with complete impunity. 

'Oh I saw a strange man looking in an apartment below my aunts'  'Oh tell us more...'  'Oh I will and btw I worked at Buck Palace, and have a Berkshire postcode and my husband works for the EU'.  'Oh how lovely what delightful people you are'  ::)
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

England World Cup Anthem For 2026:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJde7pCpro4&list=RDLJde7pCpro4&start_radio=1

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6635 on: Yesterday at 08:34 PM »
And although Donaldson's wife was found guilty it was by a 'trial of the facts' meaning she will not serve a prison sentence  ::)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg530n6v7dlo

So sheeples here you have it: a fine upstanding married couple, and Christians to boot, found guilty of child sex abuse and rape. 

Of course it does not make the Tranmers guilty but it does make you wonder why they were never treated as suspects given they probably knew MM was home alone, night after night, in an unlocked holiday apartment.  They were certainly in close proximity, a few meters, to MM shortly before she disappeared!
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 08:35 PM by Cambridgecutie »
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

England World Cup Anthem For 2026:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJde7pCpro4&list=RDLJde7pCpro4&start_radio=1

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5982
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6636 on: Yesterday at 08:44 PM »
And although Donaldson's wife was found guilty it was by a 'trial of the facts' meaning she will not serve a prison sentence  ::)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg530n6v7dlo

So sheeples here you have it: a fine upstanding married couple, and Christians to boot, found guilty of child sex abuse and rape. 

Of course it does not make the Tranmers guilty but it does make you wonder why they were never treated as suspects given they probably knew MM was home alone, night after night, in an unlocked holiday apartment.  They were certainly in close proximity, a few meters, to MM shortly before she disappeared!
OK, point taken, Cutie!

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21167
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6637 on: Yesterday at 08:50 PM »
Steve what have you got to say about https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cwy2qp32d1pt ?  And another man who professed to be a Christian.  No doubt you will say there's always one bad apple  ::)  More like the whole crate! 

What has this got to do with MM?  Everything.  It shows how people like the Tranmers would simply fly by the radar with complete impunity. 

'Oh I saw a strange man looking in an apartment below my aunts'  'Oh tell us more...'  'Oh I will and btw I worked at Buck Palace, and have a Berkshire postcode and my husband works for the EU'.  'Oh how lovely what delightful people you are'  ::)
It's horrible. I can only think anyone including church leaders should not be allowed unsupervised access to children. Teachers, clerics, scout leaders should wear bodycams. I can only say statistically children suffer more abuse from biological parents, so I offer that for what it's worth.

Offline handymanz

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6638 on: Yesterday at 10:36 PM »
Because the Police had done their background checks and decided they had no case to answer. Or they are guilty and there is a high level cover up of a paedophile ring etc.

 
Of course it does not make the Tranmers guilty but it does make you wonder why they were never treated as suspects given they probably knew MM was home alone, night after night, in an unlocked holiday apartment.  They were certainly in close proximity, a few meters, to MM shortly before she disappeared!

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21167
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6639 on: Yesterday at 11:01 PM »
But who is the narrator?  What makes his narration reliable?  What ledge? The soc image shows CC around the pillow.  MM wasn't a baby.  She was nearly 4 yoa and quite capable of reaching out for CC around the pillow.

You listen to a lot of drivel.
He sounds like a South African, whose mother tongue is Afrikaans. Name to match: Nick van der Leek.

The ledge is a given, surely? I don't know why you gainsay. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3435619/madeleine-mccann-cuddle-cat-important-portugal-investigation/