And what evidence is this theory based on?
- That the person(s) who abducted MM knew she was being left, along with the twins, every night whilst her parents were at the tapas bar/out and the apartment left unlocked. This narrows it down to the T9, PF, the Tranmers and anyone else PF told eg her friend Edna Glyn.
- The search and rescue dogs only scented MM to within the immediate vicinity suggesting MM went into a vehicle. The Tranmers had a hire car.
- Search expert Mark Harrison used state of the art tech including a plane with radar and nothing was found eg recent earth disturbance and/or a body over a very large radius.
- CAT interjected herself as a witness claiming she saw a 'suspicious man' leaving 5B which in all probability
was Matthew Oldfield who was residing there. As a result of CAT interjecting herself as a witness she was recalled by Leic police acting on behalf of PJ to take another WS to see if anything further could be gleaned from her 'sighting'. The pressure was obviously on and she made some glaring cover ups eg:
DC1485'When you are on the terrace, to which direction are you turned'
CT'We are turned to a beautiful view of the ocean and all the clay roofs of the village, where one can see the pool, the reception area, the pool zone, the tennis courts, and one could see the roof of the Tapas bar. There are trees and bushes between all of this, so when one looks out, there are only roof tops, the small homes and other villas. It is an incredible view.
And then later in the interview:
DC1485'Did you go to the Tapas Bar with your aunt'
CT'No, no, no it was not there when I visited the last time, and it is something very recent; I believe that it was built about a year ago and I was there before the Tapas Bar was constructed. I think it was a part of the reception or something similar. We were not there before. It is very new.
The above is just one of many cover ups in her WS
Others, like Steve, can't believe that a seemingly 'nice lady' like CAT could be involved especially when you have obvious unsavoury characters like CB thrown in the mix. I go on the evidence and the evidence supports the Tranmers being responsible for MM's abduction.
- Forensic psychologist suggests the perpertrator could be female and seem 'normal' to outsiders:
Mr Berry added:
“What I would say about the person who took her is that they would have to be comfortable with children.
“Many young males would be scared to remove a child from a bed in a darkened room.
“There has always also been an assumption that the person who took Maddie is a man. What if it was a woman?
“The person who took Maddie will not stand out like a sore thumb – otherwise they would have been investigated.
“This is more likely to be someone in employment, somebody who is working, somebody who is in a reasonably respected profession. This is not the creep at the end of your road who everyone thinks is bizarre.
“If it is a woman who took her then they will likely be someone who worked with children and confident around them.”
The criminal psychologist, who has been working in the field of forensic psychology for decades, said the type of person who would take a child would appear completely normal to outsiders – and maybe even their family.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3460024/madeleine-mccann-nanny-nurse-woman-purple-disappearance-theory/
