Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891201 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online handymanz

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6210 on: May 06, 2026, 12:17:AM »
Ah! OK thanks handyman! So you and Steve suspect the McCanns while Cutie thinks they are innocent?

I found CC's posts about the Tranmer's interesting because I'd never before come across that theory.
Also, CC made a good point about the Cadaver dog picking up the scent in the apartment as possibly being a result of cross contamination.
With the McCanns it's difficult to rule them out.

Online handymanz

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6211 on: May 06, 2026, 01:14:AM »
In the last few minutes of this video someone who has been in the McCanns are guilty camp, has decided it's time to visit the efficacy of cadaver sniffer dogs.

https://youtu.be/FMK-vhPie7U?t=1638

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6546
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6212 on: May 06, 2026, 05:35:PM »
I think when you remove all the noise, which is about 80% - 90%, it is obvious and simple that the perp was someone who was very aware of the McCanns nightly ritual ie at tapas bar, patio door unlocked and children in bedroom/asleep.  This narrows it down to the Tranmers.  They may have taken her with a view to raise her as their own given they were a childless couple in their 50's.  They could be forgiven for thinking the children were being neglected due to the McCanns leaving them unsupervised every night in an unlocked holiday apartment and thought they were doing all concerned a favour. 

Maybe the mark in the eye made things difficult in that MM became more easily identifiable?  Psychiatrist Raj Persaud makes a good point about this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H0GXf1rto8

Love the pictures he has in the background which are all sort of psychological  :-\



Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6213 on: May 06, 2026, 07:23:PM »
I would like to know why the Tranmers who were only metres away from the apartment at or around the time MM disappeared were never interviewed as potential suspects:

https://mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CAROL_TRANMER.htm
But they weren't there in the evening. They visited their aunt, Pamela Fenn, in the morning. https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAMELA_FENN.htm

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5919
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6214 on: May 06, 2026, 07:26:PM »
I found CC's posts about the Tranmer's interesting because I'd never before come across that theory.
Also, CC made a good point about the Cadaver dog picking up the scent in the apartment as possibly being a result of cross contamination.
With the McCanns it's difficult to rule them out.
Who the heck are the Tranmers, handyman? I thought you meant the Tanners!

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6215 on: May 06, 2026, 07:30:PM »
Who the heck are the Tranmers, handyman? I thought you meant the Tanners!
They were a childless couple in their 50s, who visited their aunt, Pamela Fenn, who lived on the third floor of the Ocean Club complex. The McCanns had an apartment on the ground floor.

I might suggest the Tranmers remained childless after twenty years of marriage because they didn't wish to have children.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6216 on: May 06, 2026, 07:36:PM »
More of a hands on approach with these two, though there is speculation as to what a potential suspect is likely to have done following the abduction. https://youtu.be/2hnKcAlFBYM

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6546
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6217 on: May 06, 2026, 07:47:PM »
But they weren't there in the evening.They visited their aunt, Pamela Fenn, in the morning. https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAMELA_FENN.htm

Yes they were!  They arrived in the morning and left early eve:

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CAROL_TRANMER.htm

And they had all the intel they needed for the abduction.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6218 on: May 06, 2026, 07:50:PM »
Yes they were!  They arrived in the morning and left early eve:

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CAROL_TRANMER.htm

And they had all the intel they needed for the abduction.
No, Pamela Fenn according to her evidence was "alone again" that evening. https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAMELA_FENN.htm

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6546
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6219 on: May 06, 2026, 07:55:PM »
No, Pamela Fenn according to her evidence was "alone again" that evening. https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAMELA_FENN.htm

You said they visited in the morning.  I said they left early evening.  According to CAT's interview they left at 6.30pm which chimes with PF's wit stat.  So one or both went back later to abduct MM. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6220 on: May 06, 2026, 08:03:PM »
You said they visited in the morning.  I said they left early evening.  According to CAT's interview they left at 6.30pm which chimes with PF's wit stat.  So one or both went back later to abduct MM.
But the timeline if true contradicts your assertion: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/apr/11/madeleinemccann

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5919
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6221 on: May 06, 2026, 08:26:PM »
They were a childless couple in their 50s, who visited their aunt, Pamela Fenn, who lived on the third floor of the Ocean Club complex. The McCanns had an apartment on the ground floor.

I might suggest the Tranmers remained childless after twenty years of marriage because they didn't wish to have children.
OK, thanks. Steve! I don't know all the details of the case.

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6546
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6222 on: May 06, 2026, 09:05:PM »
But the timeline if true contradicts your assertion: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/apr/11/madeleinemccann

How does it contradict my assertion?  CAT claims they left PF's circa 6.30pm.  PF states she was alone in the evening.  Evening starts at 6pm.  The Tranmers, one or both, were available to abduct MM inbetween the checks.  They knew the McCanns MO from when they observed on the Sunday evening and from what they heard from PF and observed again on the Thu eve.  Stop being naive Steve, they didn't need to be at PF's up until they abducted MM.  They left and drove somewhere nearby to watch and wait.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6546
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6223 on: May 06, 2026, 09:08:PM »
How does it contradict my assertion?  CAT claims they left PF's circa 6.30pm.  PF states she was alone in the evening.  Evening starts at 6pm.  The Tranmers, one or both, were available to abduct MM inbetween the checks.  They knew the McCanns MO from when they observed on the Sunday evening and from what they heard from PF and observed again on the Thu eve.  Stop being naive Steve, they didn't need to be at PF's up until they abducted MM.  They left and drove somewhere nearby to watch and wait.

And no one knows the motive: wanting a child of their own, sexual, sadistic.  And no one knows whether one, and which one, or both were involved. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6546
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6224 on: May 06, 2026, 09:32:PM »
They were a childless couple in their 50s, who visited their aunt, Pamela Fenn, who lived on the third floor of the Ocean Club complex. The McCanns had an apartment on the ground floor.

I might suggest the Tranmers remained childless after twenty years of marriage because they didn't wish to have children.

PF didn't live on the third floor.  She was directly above the McCanns ground floor apartment. 

Maybe they didn't want children but maybe one or both wanted one to abuse either sexually or sadistically. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs