Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 876388 times)

0 Members and 28 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5685 on: November 24, 2021, 08:00:AM »
dogs reacted 'to aricle's of clothing' which had been worn by 'Madeleine' at the time of her death, or afterwards. At least, 'this is my interpretation of the facts'..
It is 'much more probable', or 'likely', that 'Madeline McCanns' remains, were 'left undisturbed' in 'the shallow grave' located in 'a hollow' in 'the left hand corner of the rear garden of' the 'ramshackled', 'derelict building' bearing in mind, that the same postal address [no. 5 Ave.Dos Pescadores] relates to the church and the derelict  premises being spoken about, here..
« Last Edit: November 25, 2021, 09:33:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5686 on: November 25, 2021, 09:47:AM »
Based on 'what is [now] known', 'all ends up', with 'no stone left unturned', all I can say is 'if it had been you', or 'me', in the shoes of the 'McCann parents', and 'their friends', we 'would have been arrested' and probably 'prosecuted/convicted' on 'a variety of criminal offences'. There would be no prospect of any politician interfering with the due process of law. The police would not refuse to consider you or me as having played any role in the crimes being investigated..

Everything points toward a 'cover up'..

Everything points to 'Madeleine McCann' leaving apartment 5A, at around 11.45pm, on the 1st May 2007..

For example, the 'McCann parents' are known 'to have deleted phone call records' [ from thier mobile phones] , for the period of 'the 30th April' to the '4th May 2007'. Even more significantly, Portuguese police obtained confirmation, that 'Kate' McCann' was present inside apartment 5A at the time that 'Mrs Fenn' heard 'Madeleine' crying continously getting ever louder and louder until 11.45pm, at which point, 'Madeleine' yelled out, the all important declaration, 'DADDY', 'DADDY', 'DADDY' which coincided with the crying stopping..


« Last Edit: November 25, 2021, 10:08:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5687 on: November 25, 2021, 03:37:PM »
For everyones information, the various agencies of the state controllers, know that I find out the truth [in any legal /compensatory issue] that I take an interest in - 'Scotland Yard` had better `put their reliability' [reputation] `in order`. What we are dealing with here, are 'pedophiles', 'child abusers' and 'human sacrifice' - all those who partake in this way of life, and living, are 'LIZARDS'...

The veneral public at large, should regard that which I am referring to, as a stark warning that those in power, are not the people they have us (all) believe, or know - power corrupts...
« Last Edit: November 25, 2021, 03:42:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5688 on: November 25, 2021, 09:52:PM »

.. the 'McCann parents' are known 'to have deleted phone call records' [ from thier mobile phones] , for the period of 'the 30th April' to the '4th May 2007'. Even more significantly, Portuguese police obtained confirmation, that 'Kate' McCann' was present inside apartment 5A at the time that 'Mrs Fenn' heard 'Madeleine' crying continously getting ever louder and louder until 11.45pm, at which point, 'Madeleine' yelled out, the all important declaration, 'DADDY', 'DADDY', 'DADDY' which coincided with the crying stopping..

'NOW', that is something of significance, do you not all agree!

'Kate' was present in/at apartment 5A, from 10.40pm, onward on the evening of the '1st May 2007'. 'She' was present, therefore, throughout [the biggest part of] the 'one hour' and 'fifthteen minutes' which 'Mrs Fenn' has stated that she had witnessed persistent crying. This means that both parents did not go down to 'Chaplins bar' after their evening meal at the tapas bar restuarant [only, 'Gerald McCann' did] . It now  becomes apparent, that upon returning to apartment 5A, at 10.20pm, on that evening, that 'Kate McCann' made a telephone call to her husband using her mobile phone. It took'Gerald McCann' until 11.45pm [that same evening] to return back to apartment 5A...

Did he return alone, or in the company of another?
 
« Last Edit: November 26, 2021, 10:24:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5689 on: November 26, 2021, 01:33:PM »
'Kate McCann' was present inside apartment 5A, throughout the duration of the prolonged crying episode involving 'Madeleine', as witnessed and alerted to, by' Mrs Fenn', on the evening of the 1st May 2007, an agonising episode which dragged itself out between 10.30pm and 11.45pm (as confirmed by phone records obtained during the 'PJ' investigations). It is with absolute certainty, that at precisely 10.35pm [on that particular  evening] `Kate made a telephone call to her husband, 'Gerald'. The call resulted in dragging 'Gerald McCann' back to the family apartment [5A], 'he arriving there' at the precise time of 11.45pm. His return to the family apartment at 'this' / 'that time' coincided with 'Mrs Fenns' account that the prolonged crying [of 'Madeleine'] which had become more and more intense throughout 'a one hour' and  '15 minute' duration 'suddenly came to an abrupt halt'...

11.45pm, or thereabouts, on the evening of the 1st May 2007, 'was' / 'is' [therefore] a criticle point in the suppressed history surrounding the disappearence of 'their daughter'..
« Last Edit: November 26, 2021, 01:41:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5690 on: November 26, 2021, 01:56:PM »
'Ladies' and 'Gentlemen', the 'narrative introduced' by 'the McCann parents' and 'their friends' is exposed 'as nothing but a sham'! 'Madeleine McCann' almost certainly, and without doubt, was never present at any stage inside apartment 5A, throughout the entire period between the 2nd and 3rd May, 2007 - there simply, was no abduction, it all boils down to the following scenarios, 'either' (a) 'one' or 'other parent', 'administered a drug substance' upon which 'Madeleine', 'overdosed on', or (b) 'the parents handed her over to a third party' in the belief that 'Madeleine' would be returned [unharmed] at some stage around breakfast time, the following morning.. 
« Last Edit: November 26, 2021, 02:00:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5691 on: November 26, 2021, 02:31:PM »
'Ladies' and 'Gentlemen', the 'narrative introduced' by 'the McCann parents' and 'their friends' is exposed 'as nothing but a sham'! 'Madeleine McCann' almost certainly, and without doubt, was never present at any stage inside apartment 5A, throughout the entire period between the 2nd and 3rd May, 2007 - there simply, was no abduction,

Remember, what 'Kate McCann' allegedly 'blurted out', after 'her imminant return' to the tapas bar restuarant, 'shortly after 10.00pm' on the evening of the '3rd May 2007' - 'THEY HAVE TAKEN HER' ['Madeleine' is 'GONE']..

ASK YOURSELVES, 'How' did 'Kate McCann' know that 'her daughter had been taken' by 'more than one person'?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5692 on: November 26, 2021, 02:40:PM »

ASK YOURSELVES, 'How' did 'Kate McCann' know that 'her daughter had been taken' by 'more than one person'?

I believe, that 'she knew this', because when her husband [Gerald] had been drawn back to apartment 5A at 11.45pm, on the evening of the 1st May 2007, he was accompanied by an 'as yet unidentified man' and 'a woman'. It was 'this couple' who took 'Madeleine' away. 'One' or 'other' of the 'McCann parents' 'knew' , and 'knows' the identitity of 'one' or 'other' of 'the people', that 'took their daughter',  'away' from apartment 5A, near to midnight ['1st' / '2nd' of 'May', '2007']. The female member of this couple, was almost certainly, either an Ocean Club child care employee, or alternatively, a specialist in treating and 'conditioning the behavioural habits' of 'problematic children'..
« Last Edit: November 27, 2021, 02:57:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5693 on: November 27, 2021, 05:36:AM »
I think, believe and or suspect, that many of the major players already named in the 'PJ', 'Scotland Yard' and the 'Germany' investigations [thus far] are all people who 'were' , and 'are known' to 'one another'. The way that I am viewing this case, at the moment, is 'akin to this being nothing more' than 'a film production', involving controversial characters who are rather unusually becoming 'drawn into the script'.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2021, 09:25:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5694 on: November 27, 2021, 09:32:AM »
Why did the 'McCann parents' delete telephone and sms texts from their mobile phone memory [1st May - 4th May 2007]?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5695 on: November 27, 2021, 09:36:AM »
There are 'several features in this case' , which raise 'a red flag'. Here, I mention just a few of them..
RED FLAG ISSUISES

[1]'Kate McCanns' foreboding before holiday, that something terrible was going to happen to one or more of them

[2] ` Gerald McCanns' outburst whilst travelling on a transfer bus from the airoplane en route to arrival lounge

[3] the fact that most of the children who were holidaying at Praia de Luz, at around the time of 'Madeleine McCanns' disappearence, all had blonde coloured hair..

[4] the leaving of 'cuddle cat' in bedroom where 'Madeleine' was supposedly abducted from in apartment 5A

[5] The `mix up' relating to `which` door 'the McCann parents' left their apartment to go to the tapas bar restuarant on the evening of '3rd May 2007' in order to attend 'evening meal' in company of 'their group members' [ Roadside key lockable door, or poolside patio door unlockable from outside]

[6] `confusion' over whether or not 'Mathew Oldfield' listened at the outside of'the McCann childrens bedroom window [metal window blinds in lowered and locked position] during 'the first of his two known checks' of the 'McCann apartment [5A], at 9.00pm, and, or if,' on the second such visit' [9.30pm] when 'he was accompanied' by' Russell O'Brien', 'He', or 'they' had 'listened from outside the childrens metal shuttered window at 5A' or 'they had either approached the unlocked sliding patio door', located 'on the poolside of the premises', and either 'listened at the outside surface of the patio door' for any 'sign of noise' or 'disturbance'? Alternatively, did either of 'the two named friends of the family', actually 'slide the unlocked patio door open' and 'then one or other' or 'both' then 'had slipped inside to make a proper check' regarding the 'childrens safety' and 'well being' . At that point, 'did either of them approach the childrens bedroom door' and 'look inside' ? If not 'was the childrens bedroom door' still 'slightly open', as described by 'Gerald McCann' at 'the time of his 9.05pm premises' and purported 'childrens check' to / at '5A'?

[7] When 'Oldfield' and 'OBrien' left the tapas restaurant bar, at 9.30pm, having volunteered to replace 'Kate McCann' of 'performing that duty', did 'Russell O' Brien' go directly to his own apartment? If he did, then 'at what stage' did 'Mathew Oldfield' find out, or 'discover' that' Russell OBrien' would 'not be returning to the tapas restaurant' , because 'OBriens daughter' was, or 'had become ill'? Did ' Matthew Oldfield' go with 'Russell O' Brien' to the 'OBrien / Tanner' apartment, before 'Oldfield` did `the 9.30pm check` on the' McCann apartment [5A]` or 'his own apartment'?

« Last Edit: November 27, 2021, 11:03:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5696 on: November 27, 2021, 11:16:AM »
[8] In one account, 'Mathew Oldfield' has gone on record, as saying that 'When he did the 9.00pm check of 'The McCann apartment' at '5A', that he had actually entered the 'McCann apartment' via the sliding door on the poolside of the premises [contradicting what he had said previously - ie that he had only listened at / against the outside surface of the metal shutter of the 'McCann childrens' bedroom 'window'. In his latest account, he confirms that it was at the time of his 9pm check of 'the McCann apartment' that he discovered that 'Madeleine McCann' was absent, and of course, missing. He states that he checked all the rooms of apartment 5A [including 'the McCann parents' bedroom] before he dashed back to the tapas restaurant to raise the alarm. Rather somewhat disturbingly, 'he appears to have altered this version of the events, by claiming that it was during his second check of 'the McCann apartment' [5A] that 'he had entered that apartment'..

« Last Edit: November 27, 2021, 11:26:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5697 on: November 27, 2021, 12:40:PM »
[9] that half hour period 9.00pm - 9.30pm, on the evening of the 3rd May 2007, holds the key to unravelling what had truly been occurring in the mindset of 'the McCann parents' and 'some of their friends'. Lets take into account the version introduced by 'Mathew Oldfield' concerning two disjointed accounts, of his entry or otherwise into 'the McCann parents apartment' at 'both 9.00pm', and '9.30pm'. After 'having' completed 'a detailed consideration' / 'analysis' of 'other known sources of information' / 'evidence', I think we can safely conclude that it was during the first of his checks of apartment 5A, that he, infact slipped into 'the McCann apartment' [9.00pm] at which point, he discovered 'Madeleine' to be missing. Now, in that particular version of 'Mathew Oldfields' account, he visited every room in the 'McCanns apartment' to try and find 'Madeleine' without any success! As a result, he hurriedly dashed back to the tapas restuarant to alert the parents about their daughter [`Madeleine' being missing from the apartment. This exchange of information, imparted to 'Gerald McCann' by 'Mathew Oldfield' took place at just before 9.05pm, that evening. Upon receiving that information from 'Mathew Oldfield,' he', 'Gerald McCann dashed off back to the family apartment [5A], leaving' Mathew Oldfield feeling as though 'McCann' had fallen out with him. Once 'McCann' had dashed back to apartment 5A [approx' 9.05pm] `Mathew Oldfield' spoke privately with other members of the group, relating to them that which he had discovered back in 'the McCann apartment'. One of the group members that he spoke to at that time, was 'Jane Tanner'. Within five minutes, of 'Her' listening to 'Mathew Oldfield', 'She decided to go and see what' Gerald McCann' was doing, because 'he seemed to have been gone a long time' [it was now about 9.10pm].This is where 'Jane Tanner' later introduced seeing 'Gerald McCann' chatting with /to a tennis friend in the street, and once she had passed them without any acknowledgement on behalf of all concerned, she claims to have seen a man carrying a child in his arms walking across the junction ahead. By this time of course, 'Gerald McCann' had already been into apartment 5A, and 'seen all three of his children asleep in cots' and 'bed'. Now 'this raises a serious issue, since where had' Madeleine ' disappeared to by the time of 'Mathew Oldfields' 9.00pm check at apartment 5A, and reappeared 5 minutes or so later, (at just after 9.05pm) when 'Gerald McCann' did his 9.05pm check? 'Where could she have been' during that '5 minute period'. Well, after diligently analysing the contents of witness statements, I find that the only member of the group of friends who was not accounted for as being present at the tapas bar restuarant until 'Jane Tanner' relieved him of care duties [looking after their sick / ill daughter] is / was 'Russell OBrien'. He was the only known member of the supposed tapas 9 group who did not attend the initial serving of the usual evening meal. He did not turn up at the restuarant, until his partner 'Jane Tanner' arrived back at their apartment soon after 9.10pm to allow him to go to the tapas bar restuarant to eat his evening meal which the cook had put to one side for him to eat later. Sandwiched inbetween 'Jane Tanner' leaving the tapas bar to go looking for 'Gerald McCann' at 9.10pm, and her eventually arriving at her own apartment in order to relieve 'Russell OBrien' of him nursing his daughter so that he could eat the meal at the restuarant which had been prepared for, and set aside for him (lets assume that by the latest of say 9.15pm, 'OBrien' arrived at the tapas bar to consume his pre-ordered and pre-cooked evening meal, at 'or'/ 'by' aound 9.15 - 9.20pm). Then he was absent from the tapas bar restuarant for around 50 minutes, of the hour long period that the 'McCann parents' had originally left their three children home alone back inside apartment 5A. Taking into account, the 9.00pm check made by `Mathew Oldfield' of 'apartment 5A' and the 9.05pm check of the same apartment by 'Gerald McCann' there was clearly a 30 minute period of time where 'Russell OBriens' whereabouts could independently be verified [8.30pm - 9.00pm]. This time period suggests to me of being when something untoward may have taken place, and could have involved 'Russell OBrien` [8.30pm - 9.00pm] and or his partner ' Jane Tanner' [9.10pm - 10.00pm]. No-one can independantly verify the whereabouts of this couple [ first one, and then the other] between the hour of 8.30pm and 10.00pm. That is an hour and a half, during which time one or other of 'OBrien' and 'Tanner' fall into consideration.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5698 on: November 27, 2021, 12:47:PM »
[10] I am convinced that the alleged sighting by 'Jane Tanner' of a suspect carrying a child in his arms walking in a direction away from the location of ' the McCann apartment' [5A] was a deliberate ploy by 'Tanner' to divert attention away from her partner who could have, may have been involved in the circumstances of 'Madeleine McCanns' demise..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5699 on: November 27, 2021, 08:39:PM »
[11] Both 'McCann parents' deleted call and sms text messages from their respective mobile phones on key dates and times..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...