The case of Madeleine McCann

[mike tesko]

'Gerald McCann' and 'Russell O'brien' [Look alike attributes] - especially, 'in poor light' or 'fleeting glance confrontations'..

[mike tesko]

Tenuius links between, what occurred inside 'apartment 5A' (Ocean Club) involving 'Madeleine McCann' on the evening '1st May 2007', between '10.30pm' - '11.45pm', the cover up which took two more days (until evening of 3rd May 2007) to try and explain the circumstances of 'Madeleines absence' , and the possible use of one of the 'Obrien' / 'Tanner' daughters, disguised as 'Madeleine', a child who was 'taken ill' on the same evening that 'Madeleine' was reported 'gone' and 'taken'..

[mike tesko]

Tenuius links between, what occurred inside 'apartment 5A' (Ocean Club) involving 'Madeleine McCann' on the evening '1st May 2007', between '10.30pm' - '11.45pm', the cover up which took two more days (until evening of 3rd May 2007) to try and explain the circumstances of 'Madeleines absence' , and the possible use of one of the 'Obrien' / 'Tanner' daughters, disguised as 'Madeleine', a child who was 'taken ill' on the same evening that 'Madeleine' was reported 'gone' and 'taken'..

Creche records that were faked, covering attendences and activities at the kids club, on 2nd and 3rd May 2007, when and during which 'Madeleine' was not present..

[mike tesko]

Creche records that were faked, covering attendences and activities at the kids club, on 2nd and 3rd May 2007, when and during which 'Madeleine' was not present..

The 'Obrien' /'Tanner' substitute,' [`lookalike'] daughter', may have been used, dressed in 'Madeleine McCanns' clothing and this could have been sufficient into 'fooling the childcare workers' into accepting that 'Madeleine' had been 'in attendance at the creche' and 'elsewhere' [Beach] during the '2nd' and '3rd' of 'May 2007'..

This could help to account for why the 'McCann parents' ended up in possession of their 'daughters pink pyjama set' weeks after her alleged 'abduction', when 'the parents' appeared 'live' in a tv interview 'displaying the said pyjamas' [which they would later claim, was a duplicate version] without saying 'how, they had come into possession of them'..

[mike tesko]

It remains highly probable, that the 'Smith family' sighting at around 10.00pm of a man carrying a young child in his arms heading in the direction of the sea and beach, was non other than 'Russell O'brien' who 'was carrying his own sick daughter' (and if stopped, or identified would claim that he was carrying his ill daughter' intending to visit 'Luzdoc'  in order to get his daughter looked at, and possible treatment...

The journey which I feel 'Obrien' made, was designed to create interest  in the identity of the abductor of 'Madeleine' on that same evening. Overnight, with 'Russell O' brien and [their own] daughter safely returned to their `own apartment`, hence, 'Jane Tanner' eventually coming up trumps on the following morning by `declaring that on the previous evening` when 'she' had left the tapas restuarant bar' intent on checking her `own two children` in her `own apartment`, that `she had seen a man`, crossing over the junction at the top of the road carrying a child in his arms, `walking away from the vicinity of the car park side of apartment block five`. This alleged sighting of a faceless 'Tannerman', was reference to the fact that by the following morning, after 'Madeleine McCanns' disappearence had been covered by the media [worldwide], she convinced herself that her partner [Russell O'Brien] could become a suspect in the scripted 'Abuction' story, introduced to displace. The true circumstances of 'Madeleine McCanns' plight two days earlier, than it was alledged to have occurred'..

[mike tesko]

'Jane Tanners' account regarding her leaving the restuarant at about 9.10pm, on that crucial evening [3rd  May 2007] to check on her daughters back at her apartment, raises a number of significant issues (a) - the claim that after exiting the small reception door of the 'Ocean Club' that she had seen 'Gerald McCann' and 'Wilkes' talking to each other in the street ('McCann on the pavement adjacent to the alleyway on the poolside of apartment block 5'). 'Wilkes was standing more or less in the middle of the roadway, and he had a pushchair in his possession. It appeared that' Wilkes' and the pushchair had arrived in-situ after 'having walked up hill' past the small 'Ocean Club' entrance..

Bearing this in mind, 'both men' would have been 'facing' , or having their 'heads' , 'pointing toward' or 'looking at eachother'. Under such circumstances, 'how is /was it possible' for either man not to have seen or at least acknowledged the presence of 'Jane  Tanner, approaching and passing them both, since in all such circumstance, some sort of a manouvre would have had to take place enabling' Jane Tanner' to get past 'Gerald McCanns' on that narrow footpath on apartment block 5 side of the road, and that when, and if she had done this, that 'Wilkes' who would have been facing 'McCann' would inevitably have seen 'Jane Tanner'walking uphill on the same pavement that' McCann' was standing on. He would also have seen how close 'Jane Tanner' came and went beyond 'McCann', yet both 'McCann' and 'Wilkes' say they have no recollection of seeing 'Jane Tanner' in the street on that occasion..

[mike tesko]

 The late introduction of 'Tannerman' by 'Jane Tanner' [on the morning of 4th May 2007] was insurance that even if someone had recognised 'Russell O'Brien' carrying a young child in his arms heading in the direction of the sea and beach on the previous evening [3rd May 2007], that this placed more emphasis 'on the identity of the' Jane Tanner' suspect being 'the abductor'...

[mike tesko]

The late introduction of 'Tannerman' by 'Jane Tanner' [on the morning of 4th May 2007] was insurance that even if someone had recognised 'Russell O'Brien' carrying a young child in his arms heading in the direction of the sea and beach on the previous evening [3rd May 2007], that this placed more emphasis 'on the identity of the' Jane Tanner' suspect being 'the abductor'...

'Jane Tanners', 'Tannerman suspect', did not exist!

[Steve_uk]

I can't see that a tougher prison environment is going to make a scrap of difference as regards any sort of confession or even a hint, Steve. This is going nowhere.
Way back in the investigation, Raymond Hewlett, a paedophile, was named as the prime suspect. This chap was also dodgy and he had a German wife and a trail of kids tagging along, one of which was killed ? in a road accident. He was hanging around the apartment at the time.

He was another good suspect. Died of throat cancer. He said he recognized her coloboma so he must have been close up at one point.

[mike tesko]

Satanism, freemasonary, the illuminati, paganism, human sacrifice, governments, so called legal systems, religion, poverty, the new world order, sexual abuse, monarchies, etc - involve highly dedicated membership and affiliation....

[mike tesko]

'Madeleine McCann' is 'dead', the parents know this to be true!

[mike tesko]

The 'McCann parents' 'knew' and 'know' that 'Madeleines' body was made available to them, inside one of the property / grounds at 'no.' 5 Ave Dos Pescadores' [the exact same address, as 'the village church']. It was this very same address ['the church'] , that the 'PJ' beleived that the 'McCann parents' had 'concealed the body' and 'other evidence' capable of establishing 'the direct involvement of the parents' in 'their daughters demise'...

The 'PJ' hit 'the nail on the head' - however, the address [5 Ave Dos Pescadores] incorporated two [different] properties] the 'village church' and 'the derelict building' situated on 'the opposite side of the road' (to eachother) held'/ 'holds' the evidence capable of proving and establishing the direct involvement of the 'McCann parents' in the disappearence of their daughter'...

[mike tesko]

My visit to the derelict building, Praia De Luz, Portugal (5 Ave Dos Pescadores)  in June 2010 revealed to me, a number of significant clues, that at some stage 'Madeleine McCanns' body had been 'present inside rooms of this building' , and 'the discovery of a shallow grave', situated inside 'a hollow in the rear garden'[close to the gardens sea wall] `was`/`is` where the remains of the victim were / are buried..

[mike tesko]

My visit to the derelict building, Praia De Luz, Portugal (5 Ave Dos Pescadores)  in June 2010 revealed to me, a number of significant clues, that at some stage 'Madeleine McCanns' body had been 'present inside rooms of this building' , and 'the discovery of a shallow grave', situated inside 'a hollow in the rear garden'[close to the gardens sea wall] `was` / `is` where the remains of the victim were / are buried..

The claim that the 'McCann parents' had sought refuge at the village church, was as it turns out, only partially true! They actually 'sought refuge inside the derelict building' [which had the same address (5 Ave Dos Pescadores) as the church on the opposite side of street]. This building [derelict) was where the 'McCann parents' concealed the body of their daughter for at least a couple of weeks, or so. It was also the location where the parents entertained other 'paedophile' / 'satanic cult members' ..

[mike tesko]

The 'location of the shallow grave' which I stumbled upon by accident [June 2010] inside a hollow, in the rear garden of the derelict building [5 Ave Dos Pescadores] was as I now understand it, originally 'a privately owned well' and which appeared to me, to be in alignment with a clear view of the local church clock tower across the street..